23.02.2013 Views

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

British Associ<strong>at</strong>ion for <strong>the</strong> Advancement of Science agreed,<br />

in 1838, <strong>to</strong> establish its own system. Led by Samuel Hunt<br />

Christie, John Herschel, Humphrey Lloyd, and Edward<br />

Sabine, <strong>the</strong> British Associ<strong>at</strong>ion system consisted of 10 observ<strong>at</strong>ories,<br />

with coverage expanded <strong>to</strong> include <strong>the</strong> British<br />

colonies and India (with <strong>the</strong> cooper<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> East<br />

India Company). The British system coordin<strong>at</strong>ed with 23<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r observ<strong>at</strong>ories sc<strong>at</strong>tered in <strong>the</strong> Russian Empire, Asia,<br />

North America, North Africa, and Europe, all of whom<br />

were funded by <strong>the</strong>ir respective governments, except for<br />

those in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es funded by academic institutions<br />

(Girard College and Harvard University). Also part of this<br />

effort was a British naval expedition <strong>to</strong> make observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

in Antarctica, led by James Clark Ross (1839– 1843).<br />

There were some limit<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

cooper<strong>at</strong>ion. Although <strong>the</strong> British system synchronized observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

using Göttingen Mean Time, as suggested by <strong>the</strong><br />

Göttingen Magnetische Verein, so th<strong>at</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a could be compared,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was no formal collabor<strong>at</strong>ion. The Paris Observ<strong>at</strong>ory<br />

acted independently of its o<strong>the</strong>r European counterparts.<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less, by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> Crusade formally ended<br />

in 1848, <strong>the</strong>re was a fi rmly established network of magnetic<br />

observ<strong>at</strong>ories in Europe, throughout <strong>the</strong> British Empire,<br />

and in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> continued <strong>to</strong> make observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and exchange d<strong>at</strong>a. O<strong>the</strong>r observ<strong>at</strong>ories l<strong>at</strong>er joined<br />

in <strong>the</strong> cooper<strong>at</strong>ive venture, including th<strong>at</strong> of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Smithsonian</strong><br />

Institution (Rhees, 1859: 27– 29). Most importantly,<br />

as Cawood argued, <strong>the</strong> Magnetic Crusade demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

“th<strong>at</strong> large-scale oper<strong>at</strong>ions could be organized and carried<br />

through” (1979: 516). Even Taylor, who argued for <strong>the</strong> signifi<br />

cance of <strong>the</strong> IPY in <strong>the</strong> demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> possibilities<br />

of large-scale intern<strong>at</strong>ional cooper<strong>at</strong>ion, admitted th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Magnetic Crusade “provided many precedents for subsequent<br />

global scientifi c endeavours” (1981: 370).<br />

METEOROLOGICAL COOPERATION<br />

We<strong>at</strong>her does not respect political boundaries, and<br />

many meteorologists realized <strong>the</strong> need for cooper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

German meteorologists <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>the</strong> lead, with such organiz<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Süddeutsche Meteorologische Verein<br />

(1841), <strong>the</strong> Könglich Preussische Meteorologische Institut<br />

(1847), and <strong>the</strong> Norddeutsche Seewarte (1872).<br />

These organiz<strong>at</strong>ions had rel<strong>at</strong>ively limited geographical<br />

coverage, however, and were intern<strong>at</strong>ional only because<br />

of <strong>the</strong> political fragment<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> German scientifi c<br />

community (Fleming, 1990: 165– 166).<br />

A more signifi cant intern<strong>at</strong>ional approach <strong>to</strong> meteorological<br />

observ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>to</strong>ok place in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es. Per-<br />

COOPERATION AT THE POLES? 15<br />

haps not coincidently, it was fi rst directed by a physicist<br />

who was an active geomagnetic observer, who had cooper<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Magnetic Crusade, and was aware of <strong>the</strong><br />

rewards and challenges of intern<strong>at</strong>ional cooper<strong>at</strong>ion. Not<br />

only had Joseph Henry received practical advice on observing<br />

from Edward Sabine while in England in 1837 (Reingold<br />

et al., 1979: 312– 313), but he also “had convers<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

with Mr[.] Christie on <strong>the</strong> subject of establishing magnetic<br />

observ<strong>at</strong>or[i]es <strong>to</strong> cooper<strong>at</strong>e with those established<br />

by Humboldt” (Reingold et al., 1979: 303). Joseph Henry<br />

became <strong>the</strong> fi rst secretary of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Smithsonian</strong> Institution in<br />

1846 and established a program th<strong>at</strong> placed an emphasis<br />

on <strong>the</strong> coordin<strong>at</strong>ion of large-scale research projects, arguing<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re were no o<strong>the</strong>r institutions in <strong>the</strong> United St<strong>at</strong>es<br />

equipped <strong>to</strong> do so. The fi rst such project Henry embraced<br />

was <strong>the</strong> development wh<strong>at</strong> Elias Loomis, one of Henry’s<br />

consultants in meteorology, characterized as “a grand meteorological<br />

crusade” for collecting meteorological observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

(<strong>Smithsonian</strong> Institution, 1848: 207).<br />

The system devised by Henry had two distinct but<br />

interrel<strong>at</strong>ed components, both requiring cooper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The fi rst was a system of observers who— using standard<br />

appar<strong>at</strong>us, techniques, and forms <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> gre<strong>at</strong>est extent<br />

possible— maintained monthly logs of we<strong>at</strong>her conditions<br />

th<strong>at</strong> were sent <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Smithsonian</strong> for reduction.<br />

These logs were used <strong>to</strong> understand clim<strong>at</strong>e and we<strong>at</strong>her<br />

tendencies over <strong>the</strong> long term. From <strong>the</strong> onset, it was<br />

recognized th<strong>at</strong> “<strong>to</strong> give this system its gre<strong>at</strong>est effi ciency,<br />

<strong>the</strong> co- oper<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>the</strong> British government and of <strong>the</strong><br />

Hudson’s Bay Company [in Canada] is absolutely indispensable”<br />

(<strong>Smithsonian</strong>, 1848: 207). Both <strong>the</strong> British government<br />

and <strong>the</strong> priv<strong>at</strong>e Hudson’s Bay Company quickly<br />

agreed <strong>to</strong> cooper<strong>at</strong>e (Fleming, 1990: 123). The program<br />

soon expanded throughout North and Central America.<br />

Observers were recruited in Bermuda, Mexico, all <strong>the</strong><br />

Central American countries, and throughout <strong>the</strong> West Indies,<br />

frequently drawing, in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>ter two regions, upon<br />

Americans residing overseas (<strong>Smithsonian</strong> Institution,<br />

1872: 68– 69). The second component was <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong><br />

telegraph <strong>to</strong> forward d<strong>at</strong>a on we<strong>at</strong>her in real time <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Smithsonian</strong>, allowing, in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e 1850s, for <strong>the</strong> public<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of <strong>the</strong> fi rst scientifi cally based we<strong>at</strong>her forecasts in<br />

newspapers and <strong>the</strong> fi rst publicly posted we<strong>at</strong>her maps.<br />

These forecasts were based on <strong>the</strong> conclusions drawn<br />

from <strong>the</strong> monthly d<strong>at</strong>a logs. Unlike <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a g<strong>at</strong>hering,<br />

<strong>the</strong> forecasting only lasted a few years and ended before<br />

<strong>the</strong> dream of making it intern<strong>at</strong>ional was accomplished.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> obstacles it ran in<strong>to</strong> was <strong>the</strong> realiz<strong>at</strong>ion by<br />

<strong>the</strong> commercial telegraph companies th<strong>at</strong> we<strong>at</strong>her d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

was a valuable commercial commodity; <strong>the</strong> companies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!