23.02.2013 Views

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338 SMITHSONIAN AT THE POLES / EISERT AND OFTEDAL<br />

<strong>the</strong> vulnerability of popul<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>to</strong> annual or long-term<br />

changes in prey availability, as might occur due <strong>to</strong> changes<br />

in sea ice or shifts in w<strong>at</strong>er currents.<br />

MASS CHANGES DURING<br />

WEDDELL SEAL LACTATION<br />

Prior work on Weddell seals has focused primarily<br />

on mass changes of mo<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong>ir pups, under <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />

th<strong>at</strong> if mo<strong>the</strong>rs are fasting, <strong>the</strong>re should be correspondence<br />

between m<strong>at</strong>ernal mass loss, m<strong>at</strong>ernal milk<br />

output, and pup mass gain, as is <strong>the</strong> case in o<strong>the</strong>r true seals<br />

th<strong>at</strong> fast throughout lact<strong>at</strong>ion. In <strong>the</strong>se species, m<strong>at</strong>ernal<br />

body mass and age are strong determinants of <strong>to</strong>tal milk<br />

energy output and, consequently, of pup growth and weaning<br />

mass (Iverson et al., 1993; Fedak et al., 1996; Arnbom<br />

et al., 1997; Mellish et al., 1999b). By contrast, females<br />

feed during a variable proportion of lact<strong>at</strong>ion in almost<br />

half of extant phocid species (Bonner, 1984; Oftedal et al.,<br />

1987a; Boness et al., 1994; Boness and Bowen, 1996;<br />

Lydersen and Kovacs, 1999; Eisert, 2003). Bowen et al.<br />

(2001a) found th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> positive correl<strong>at</strong>ion of m<strong>at</strong>ernal<br />

body mass with pup weaning mass was much weaker in<br />

harbor seals than in species th<strong>at</strong> fast during lact<strong>at</strong>ion, presumably<br />

because supplementary feeding results in a partial<br />

decoupling of m<strong>at</strong>ernal mass loss and milk transfer <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pup. Similar p<strong>at</strong>terns have been found in ice-breeding<br />

FIGURE 1. Change in body mass of lact<strong>at</strong>ing Weddell seals from<br />

early (2– 3 days postpartum) <strong>to</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e (35– 45 days postpartum) lact<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>at</strong> Hut<strong>to</strong>n Cliffs, Erebus Bay, McMurdo Sound. D<strong>at</strong>a were<br />

obtained from 24 females in 2006 and 2007. Average r<strong>at</strong>e of mass<br />

loss was 1.0% of initial mass per day.<br />

grey seals H. grypus and harp seals P. groenlandica (Baker<br />

et al., 1995; Lydersen and Kovacs, 1996, 1999).<br />

Extant d<strong>at</strong>a for Weddell seals are more complex. Weddell<br />

seal females certainly lose a large amount of body mass:<br />

for example, females th<strong>at</strong> we studied in 2006 and 2007 lost<br />

40% of <strong>the</strong>ir two-day postpartum mass during about 40<br />

days lact<strong>at</strong>ion (Figure 1). The daily mass loss of 1.0% of<br />

initial mass is lower than values of 1.5%– 3.4% for fasting<br />

and lact<strong>at</strong>ing females of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn elephant seal, sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

elephant seal, land-breeding gray seal, and hooded<br />

seal (Costa et al., 1986; Carlini et al., 1997; Mellish et al.,<br />

1999a, 1999b), but Weddell seal lact<strong>at</strong>ion is so prolonged<br />

th<strong>at</strong> overall mass loss (42%) is equal <strong>to</strong> or gre<strong>at</strong>er than th<strong>at</strong><br />

in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species (14%– 39%). If mass loss is standardized<br />

<strong>to</strong> a lact<strong>at</strong>ion length of 42 days, initial mass predicts<br />

66% of <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion in mass loss, indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> large females<br />

lose more mass than small females (Figure 2). Is this<br />

because large females expend more energy (on metabolism<br />

and milk production) or because <strong>the</strong>y feed less? Females<br />

th<strong>at</strong> lose more mass also support more mass gain by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

pups: pup mass gain was positively correl<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ernal<br />

mass loss (Figure 3). Tedman and Green (1987) found a<br />

similar strong positive correl<strong>at</strong>ion (r � 0.85, P � 0.001)<br />

between m<strong>at</strong>ernal mass loss and pup mass gain, whereas<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a from studies by Hill (1987) and Testa et al. (1989)<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>e a much weaker correl<strong>at</strong>ion between m<strong>at</strong>ernal mass<br />

loss and pup mass gain (r � 0.16, P � 0.005, n � 35).<br />

FIGURE 2. Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship of m<strong>at</strong>ernal mass loss <strong>to</strong> initial m<strong>at</strong>ernal<br />

mass of lact<strong>at</strong>ing Weddell seals. Initial mass was measured <strong>at</strong> two<br />

<strong>to</strong> three days postpartum. Mass loss was normalized <strong>to</strong> 42 days and<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> initial mass by Deming linear regression. D<strong>at</strong>a are from<br />

<strong>the</strong> same 24 females <strong>at</strong> Hut<strong>to</strong>n Cliffs, Erebus Bay, McMurdo Sound,<br />

as in Figure 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!