Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR
Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR
Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Public sector health facilities play a crucial role in the health service system as they<br />
provide health services to the people in all localities with good accessibility <strong>and</strong> coverage,<br />
particularly in remote areas, while private sector health facilities play a significant role in<br />
urban areas. The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) is the most important healthcare<br />
provider in the public sector. MOPH’s provincial hospitals achieved national coverage as<br />
early as the 1950s, followed by the achievement of “a district hospital in every district”<br />
coverage by the 1980s, <strong>and</strong> “health centers/health promotion hospitals in every sub-district<br />
(tambon)” coverage by the 1990s. In addition, MOPH owns <strong>and</strong> operates 25 large regional<br />
hospitals <strong>for</strong> advanced tertiary care, <strong>and</strong> 47 specialized hospitals. Complementing MOPH<br />
health facilities, there are a number of health facilities operated by other public agencies,<br />
including university hospitals, Ministry of Defense hospitals, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration<br />
facilities, as well as those provided by other local administrative organizations.<br />
There are over 800 public hospitals <strong>and</strong> 9,000 health centers/health promotion hospitals in<br />
the country. Private health facilities also play a significant role in providing health services<br />
in urban areas throughout the country, particularly in areas with good economic status.<br />
There are over 16,800 private clinics without in-patient beds <strong>and</strong> 340 private hospitals<br />
nationwide. Private hospitals provide around 20 percent of hospital beds in the country.<br />
Achieving almost universal health coverage through three public m<strong>and</strong>atory insurance<br />
arrangements in 2002 is one of the most significant achievements in the development of<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s health service system. The Universal Health Coverage (UC) scheme, the Social<br />
Security Scheme (SSS), <strong>and</strong> the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS) now<br />
cover an estimated 98 percent of the population, with the UC scheme alone covering 75<br />
percent. The cost of the UC <strong>and</strong> CSMBS is borne by the national budget, while SSS (<strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong>mal sector labor <strong>for</strong>ce) is financed by tripartite contributions from employers, employees<br />
<strong>and</strong> the government. Overall, the universal health coverage policy not only provides equal<br />
opportunities <strong>for</strong> women <strong>and</strong> men to receive healthcare services, but it has been very effective<br />
in improving access to health services <strong>for</strong> the poor. Incidences of catastrophic outof-pocket<br />
health expenditures declined from 5.4 percent in the pre-UC era to 3.3 percent<br />
thereafter. The impact of out-of-pocket expenditures <strong>for</strong> health on increasing the poverty<br />
headcount has declined from 2.1 percent to 0.8 percent. 102 Overall, utilization of health<br />
centers <strong>and</strong> district hospital services has doubled after the introduction of the UC scheme.<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> has achieved a lot with relatively low levels of spending on health per GDP,<br />
though the government’s share of health spending is constantly rising. Total health spending<br />
(financed from public <strong>and</strong> private sources) in Thail<strong>and</strong> was estimated to amount to<br />
around 4 percent of GDP in 2008. This is lower than many regional <strong>and</strong> middle-income<br />
peers that have made less progress toward universal coverage. Nevertheless, unlike<br />
many other middle-income countries, a high <strong>and</strong> rising share of total health spending is<br />
financed by the government. In 1995, government financing accounted <strong>for</strong> 47 percent of<br />
total health spending; by 2008, this had increased to 75 percent. As a result, government<br />
health spending as a share of GDP has nearly doubled, from around 1.5 percent in 1995<br />
to almost 3 percent in 2008. The upside of this trend is the reduced reliance on out-ofpocket<br />
financing, <strong>and</strong> the benefits that come with that in terms of financial protection <strong>and</strong><br />
equity in access. However, these benefits imply a growing fiscal burden. In a context of<br />
102 Limwattananon et al (2005) Presentation to the International Conference on Social Health Insurance in Developing<br />
Countries, December 5-7, 2005, Berlin, Germany.<br />
THAI FLOOD 2011 RAPID ASSESSMENT FOR RESILIENT RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION PLANNING<br />
137