15.11.2013 Views

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> losses, other sites with little or no damage will also experience high losses due to a<br />

reduced number of tourists. For example, Sukothai Historical Park received almost no<br />

tourists even if the region was not really affected by floods (Annex 21).<br />

Several festivals will most likely experience losses <strong>and</strong>/or might be cancelled. The floods’<br />

effects on other culture-related activities (craft <strong>and</strong> artisans livelihoods, local events <strong>and</strong><br />

markets) is much more difficult to quantify, yet a negative impact has definitely been noted.<br />

A number of assumptions have been made based on in<strong>for</strong>mation provided by the Tourism<br />

Authority of Thail<strong>and</strong> (TAT).<br />

Losses Estimates <strong>for</strong> Intangible Heritage 130<br />

In terms of losses, the team was able to gather in<strong>for</strong>mation about <strong>for</strong>eign <strong>and</strong> local investments<br />

losses, as well as losses <strong>for</strong> 2011 <strong>and</strong> 2012. In addition, since the National Parks<br />

documentation did not provide the proportion of Thai <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign visitors, TAT documentation<br />

was used to assume the proportion of <strong>for</strong>eign to Thai visitors to the park as a function<br />

of the proportion of <strong>for</strong>eign to Thai visitors per province.<br />

Visitor figures are based on<br />

the fact that parks in Thail<strong>and</strong><br />

are mostly visited by locals. 131<br />

Table 64 summarizes the total<br />

losses as roughly 2.4 <strong>and</strong><br />

0.68 billion in 2011 <strong>and</strong> 2012,<br />

respectively.<br />

Heritage Assets<br />

Repository of Heritage<br />

Natural Heritage<br />

Intangible Heritage<br />

TOTAL<br />

2011<br />

571.46<br />

3.13<br />

10.69<br />

1,810.78<br />

2,396.06<br />

2012<br />

38.52<br />

1.30<br />

5.65<br />

634.96<br />

680.42<br />

Table 64: Heritage sector<br />

– Summary of yearly losses<br />

per subsector in Thai baht,<br />

millions<br />

Figure 17: Ayuthaya<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> during the<br />

floods<br />

Source: Wikipedia<br />

*Note: dates July 11, 2011 <strong>and</strong> October 23, 2011<br />

130 Cross-references were checked with the Tourism <strong>and</strong> Environment sectors to avoid double accounting.<br />

131 See Thavarasukha (1995) states that most Thai parks are visited by 95 percent local tourists, while Lindberg <strong>and</strong> al.<br />

(1997) refers to the increasing number of <strong>for</strong>eigners visiting the parks, leaving up to 85 percent to the local market. We<br />

have used that proportion.<br />

182 THAI FLOOD 2011 RAPID ASSESSMENT FOR RESILIENT RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION PLANNING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!