15.11.2013 Views

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and ... - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Separation of Roles in River Basin Organisations (RBOs)<br />

Organisaon<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Seer/Regulator<br />

Resource<br />

Manager<br />

Operator/Service<br />

Provider/<br />

Developer<br />

Rhine Commission μ 44 μ<br />

Murray Darling μ 44 ν<br />

Jordan V. Authority ν 4 4<br />

Ebro μ 4 4<br />

JTP Corp. μ 4 4<br />

Senegal μ 4 4<br />

Volta ν 44 4<br />

Niger ν 4 μ<br />

Lesotho μ 4 4<br />

TVA μ 44 44<br />

Legend :<br />

44 - Major role, 4 - Signifi cant role, ν - Minor role, μ - No role.<br />

Rhine Commission - International Commission <strong>for</strong> Protection of the River Rhine<br />

Murray Darling - Murray Darling Basin Commission, Australia<br />

Jordan V. Authority - Jordan Valley Authority<br />

Ebro<br />

- Hydrographic Confederation of the Ebro Basin, Spain<br />

JTP Corp. - Jasa Tirta Public Corp. (Brantas River Basin, Indonesia)<br />

Senegal<br />

- OMVS (Senegal Basin Authority)<br />

Niger<br />

- Niger Basin Authority<br />

Lesotho<br />

- Joint Permanent Technical Commission of the Lesotho Highl<strong>and</strong> Water Project<br />

TVA<br />

- Tennessee Valley Authority<br />

The implication of the above analysis is that a lack of clear separation of roles <strong>and</strong><br />

functions occurs in many RBO’s, particularly between the roles of resource manager<br />

<strong>and</strong> the operator/service provider. The more mature organizations such as the Rhine,<br />

Murray Darling Basin Commission (MDBC), <strong>and</strong> Delaware River Basin Commission<br />

have a strong role in resource management <strong>and</strong> any operational function is quite<br />

minor <strong>and</strong> is ‘ring-fenced’ within the organization to ensure no confusion in accountabilities.<br />

However, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has a strong role in both, but<br />

is generally considered to have per<strong>for</strong>med well in both areas. It very much reflects<br />

the situation when it was established in the 1930’s, but this dual role is now being<br />

questioned.<br />

The strong water resources development pressures in many of the basin organizations<br />

reviewed have dem<strong>and</strong>ed them to exercise a strong presence in the development/<br />

operator field. It is presumed that this situation has arisen, due largely to the fact that<br />

existing line agencies operating within the basins have not been able to drive new<br />

development in a coordinated way. However, as most overseas basin organizations<br />

have a significant resource management role, the challenge is to make management<br />

<strong>and</strong> provider roles <strong>and</strong> processes separate <strong>and</strong> as transparent as possible to ensure<br />

that the management function is able to properly influence good decisions regarding<br />

major development proposals.<br />

High level stakeholder/community input. The Netherl<strong>and</strong>, France, Spain, Mexico,<br />

Australia, USA <strong>and</strong> the UK all recognize the need <strong>for</strong> some <strong>for</strong>m of high level<br />

stakeholder <strong>for</strong>um that gives the stakeholder close access to the minister or authority<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> water management or oversight of the management of a river basin.<br />

As well, such mechanisms provide links out into the general community that act both<br />

THAI FLOOD 2011 RAPID ASSESSMENT FOR RESILIENT RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION PLANNING<br />

A-47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!