Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Središnju poziciju teme ljubavi u okviru renesansne filozofije treba razumijevati<br />
iz činjenice da je upravo renesansni novoplatonizam bitan segment<br />
renesansne filozofije, a ono što bitno određuje renesansni novoplatonizam jest<br />
sinkretizam koji se očituje primarno kao težnja za onim što povezuje. U skladu<br />
s tom tendencijom onda u novoplatonički koncipiranom ontologijskom sustavu<br />
ključnu poziciju ima ono ‘srednje’, ono ‘između’, što povezuje krajnosti i<br />
što zbog te povezujuće funkcije nužno mora biti dvojakog značaja. Takvu posredničku<br />
ulogu ima prije svega ljubav. Stoga se može zaključiti da renesansni<br />
sinkretizam kulminira upravo u renesansnim traktatima o ljubavi.<br />
Ključne riječi: renesansna filozofija, filozofija ljubavi; Marsilio Ficino, Frane Petrić/<br />
Patricius, Nikola Vitov Gučetić/Gozze<br />
“AMOR – COPULA MUNDI”: RENAISSANCE TRACTS<br />
ON LOVE (FICINO, PETRIĆ, GUČETIĆ)<br />
In no other historical era has the love theme been given such prominence<br />
as in the period of the Renaissance. Indeed, Renaissance texts on love had their<br />
thematic predecessors, notably in the poetry of the troubadours, and later in the<br />
Petrarchan verse, but a fleeting glimpse into the Renaissance tracts, especially<br />
those written in the mid-fifteenth century and later, makes it clear that in terms<br />
of approach and concept they greatly differ from their medieval forerunners.<br />
At the core of this difference lies the introduction of Plato’s doctrine on love<br />
into the Western cultural circle. Namely, the popularity of the Renaissance<br />
thematisation of love should be sought in the revival of the interest in Plato’s<br />
doctrine, rediscovered through the translation of Marsilio Ficino and his commentary<br />
on Plato’s dialogue Symposium.<br />
With his views of love, Ficino also influenced two Croatian philosophers<br />
of the Renaissance: Frane Petrić, who, explicitly to love, devoted his works<br />
L’amorosa filosofia and Il Delfino ovvero del baccio, and Nikola Vitov Gučetić,<br />
whose Dialogo d’amore detto Antos is devoted to the love theme, the latter also<br />
being discussed in his Dialogo della bellezza detto Antos.<br />
Petrić and Gučetić wrote their tracts on love almost a century after Ficino,<br />
and their texts on love, in which Ficino’s influence is undisputed, bring novel<br />
accents in the treatment of the love theme, which will be the focus of this<br />
paper. Our aim is not to present a thorough comparative analysis of the love<br />
concepts of the three Renaissance philosophers, but to outline the novel elements<br />
in Petrić’s and Gučetić’s approach to the philosophy of love in relation<br />
to Ficino. In order to understand these new accents, it is necessary to provide<br />
an insight into the features of Ficino’s concept of love. Therefore the first part<br />
137