Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

while the unit of funding per student (known as the “unit of resource”) has
fallen by 40% and is still falling: the government has announced plans to cut it
by 0.8% in the current year and 0.9% in each of the next two years. Between
1980 and 1997 alone, the staff-student ratio almost doubled, from 9:1 to 17.1.
In 1994–5 university expenditure on books and periodicals had fallen to
less than one and a half volumes per student per year. As for the academic
staff, a report commissioned by the government 13 recently showed that salaries
since 1981 alone have fallen by 30% compared with the average earnings of all
other non-manual employees. Perhaps even more shocking, by 1997–8 42% of
academic staff were on fixed-term contracts, and if the present trend continues
over 50% will be thus casualized by 2003–4. Even at Oxford, an increasing
proportion of the teaching is being done by staff on short-term and part-time
contracts, who are of course cheaper to employ. Such casual workers do not get
benefits such as pension rights.
3) Mrs Thatcher’s assault
Despite the steady increase in student numbers, Mrs Thatcher made savage
cuts in higher education funding. In the years after she was first elected
Prime Minister in 1979, there was much play with such cliches as “trimming
the fat” and “cutting out the dead wood”. Her idea seemed to be that universities
with their staff were like barrels of apples, which could be picked over and
the rotten ones rejected, and that she was the first person ever to get this done.
So far as I know no attempt has since been made to show that the proportion of
dead wood or rotten apples was decreased by all the upheaval, or indeed that it
achieved anything positive.
Perhaps I should pause to emphasize this point, since I understand that you
may face a similar danger in Japan. When the government wants to seize power
over education it calls it “reform”, but never explains what requires reform,
what the universities have been doing wrong, beyond perhaps some meaningless
phrase like “failure to modernize”, or connecting us with some unsatisfactory
condition which is nothing to do with us. 14 This is because if they were
13
The Betts Report. There is no sign that it will be acted upon.
14
In an open letter to the Secretary of State for Education in 1986, Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor
wrote: “It is true that the economic performance of the country has been disappointing. It is
also true that the universities contribute to the nation’s economic performance. But to infer, from
a linking of these two statements, that higher education has been ineffective is neither logical
nor just. It would be truer to say that an economic performance widely recognized to have been
outstandingly bad has occurred in spite of the contribution of a higher education system which is
widely recognized to be outstandingly good, and that in those circumstances the causes of the poor
economic performance must be sought elsewhere.” (Oxford University Gazette)
199