Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE POSSIBILITY OF CRITICISM OF THE BOLOGNA<br />
EDUCATION SYSTEM IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA<br />
FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABLE<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
We are engaged in social and environmental consequences of economic<br />
commodity, commercialization and fragmentation of the Bologna education in<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina. We advocate the thesis which claims that in order to<br />
speak about the global, regional and local importance of maintaining Bosnia<br />
and Herzegovina and its immanent diversity, we are to speak on the basis of<br />
qualitative analysis, and not only with the help of econometric analysis that<br />
is integrated in the Bologna system, defining the very concept of education,<br />
university, quality and sustainability. The central auto-referential problem is<br />
that the Bologna system – in the language itself – is subordinated to the dominant<br />
discourse of econometric fundamentalism and the so-called “knowledge<br />
economy”, and therefore is also exclusively described through the economic<br />
categories (e.g. ‘efficiency’, ‘effectiveness’, ‘stakeholders’, ‘satisfaction’, etc.<br />
The fact that about 50% of unemployed are young people, of whom the majority<br />
has completed high school and college, is completely ignored). Therefore,<br />
we advocate for a different (meaningful) measures of sustainable development<br />
in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which would recognize the specific history as well<br />
as the present and future sustainable environment of this state.<br />
ZORAN DIMIĆ<br />
Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Nišu, Srbija /<br />
Philosophische Fakultät, Universität Niš, Serbien<br />
UNIVERZITET I UŽIVANJE<br />
Budući da se danas, u pokušaju jednog novog promišljanja ideje univerziteta,<br />
ne možemo više skrivati iza nacije, države ili same institucije (Fichte,<br />
Humboldt, Schleiermacher), težište i oslonac takvog jednog procesa moramo<br />
tražiti izvan njih. Gdje nam onda preostaje otvoriti nove horizonte ovoj ideji?<br />
Kako da danas shvatimo Habermasovu sugestiju da se »ideji univerziteta novi<br />
život može udahnuti jedino još extra muros« ili Derridaovu da takva jedna<br />
»odluka mišljenja ne može biti unutar-institucionalni događaj, akademski momenat«.<br />
Dok su antičke visokoškolske institucije (Akademija, Lykei) djelovale<br />
62