PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
.0500<br />
.040 0<br />
z .030 0<br />
E<br />
L.)<br />
0 .020 0<br />
.0140<br />
I<br />
4 0 20 .0 40 .0 60 .0 80 . 0 100 . 0 120 . 0 146 . 0<br />
ELAPSED TIME . (MIN . ]<br />
Figure 4 . Precipitation (PI, observed soil water flow (F), and modele d<br />
soil water flow (M) at 11 cm . Lysimeter suction was 146 cm of water .<br />
tion provides a satisfactory description of th e<br />
flow of water in the upper rooting zone o f<br />
our Douglas-fir stand . Since the Everett<br />
gravelly sandy loam is extremely variable, our<br />
results probably should not be extrapolate d<br />
much beyond the local area in which the y<br />
were obtained .<br />
We have not been able to account for th e<br />
25 percent discrepancy between predicted<br />
and observed peak flows . A number of possible<br />
explanations have occurred to us . It can<br />
be argued that the lysimeter system is not a<br />
perfect device for measuring water flow in a<br />
vertical column of soil . For example, in the<br />
early stages of a flow experiment, acceleratio n<br />
of flow due to lysimeter suction may be<br />
greater than that due to gravity. Perhaps more<br />
significant may be variations in flow associated<br />
with the lack of homogeneity of an i n<br />
situ forest soil. We suspect that stones or<br />
roots in soil above the lysimeter plate diverte d<br />
water toward or away from the plate . Perhaps<br />
more important, our estimates of initial value s<br />
of 0 at several nodes are not accurate.<br />
It is probably more important to emphasiz e<br />
that the field experiments described here wer e<br />
conducted for purposes rather far removed<br />
from our present one of evaluating th e<br />
Richards equation as a possible component of<br />
a soil-plant-atmosphere model . We also wish<br />
to point out that the Richards equation has<br />
not received adequate evaluation in field situations,<br />
perhaps because the stringent under -<br />
lying assumptions are rarely satisfied . Th e<br />
rather close correspondence between model<br />
and observation that we have obtained suggests<br />
that the model may be more robust tha n<br />
has been generally believed .<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The work reported in this paper was supported<br />
by National Science Foundation Grant<br />
No. GB-20963 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome ,<br />
U .S. Analysis of Ecosystems, Internationa l<br />
Biological Program . This is Contribution No .<br />
27 to the Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Biome .<br />
100