22.01.2014 Views

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRIMARY PRRODUCTIO N<br />

■<br />

FOLIAGE<br />

C<strong>ON</strong>ES AN D<br />

SEEDS<br />

r<br />

GRAZIN G<br />

VERTEBRATE S<br />

GRAZIN G<br />

INSECTS<br />

SUCKIN G<br />

INSECTS<br />

SEED AN D<br />

C<strong>ON</strong>E INSECTS<br />

f<br />

V<br />

PREDACEOU S<br />

BIRDS<br />

PARASITI C<br />

INVERTEBRATES<br />

PREDACEOUS<br />

INVERTEBRATE S<br />

Figure 2 . The major energy pathways between components of the forest canopy food chain .<br />

The paths of energy (fig. 2) may be<br />

followed beginning in the spring when th e<br />

buds of the conifers swell and insect herbivores<br />

emerge and feed . While they are small ,<br />

the grazing and sucking insects are preyed<br />

upon by other invertebrates . Later they are<br />

preyed upon by birds that switch from<br />

conifer seeds to insect larvae during thei r<br />

breeding season . Energy leaves the system in<br />

the form of food for predators in other foo d<br />

chains, migrating birds, detritus, and heat .<br />

The amounts of energy following these routes<br />

is not known yet . Consumption rates, relative<br />

densities of consumers, food quality variability,<br />

assimilation efficiencies, an d<br />

migration habits are also not known for mos t<br />

of the consumers . These problems will require<br />

further research before the model may b e<br />

quantified. The two diagrams and the definitions<br />

and assumptions that were outlined i n<br />

the preceding sections represent our curren t<br />

conceptual model of the canopy food chain .<br />

Interconnections with<br />

Other Subsystem s<br />

The conceptual model presented here of<br />

the forest canopy consumer subsystem ma y<br />

be used to describe possible interrelation s<br />

between it and other subsystems. By definition,<br />

this subsystem contains consumers tha t<br />

feed primarily in the forest canopy ; therefore ,<br />

we would not expect it to be tightly coupled<br />

to other food chains . However, since the food<br />

base defines the subsystem and, in the case of<br />

the canopy food chain, herbivores are mor e<br />

specific in food habits than the carnivores, it<br />

is evident that direct couplings will probabl y<br />

result from the feeding behavior of th e<br />

secondary consumers . For example, adul t<br />

insects from other subsystems may serve as<br />

food for flycatcher birds which live primaril y<br />

in the canopy . Predaceous invertebrates from<br />

the forest floor feed upon canopy specie s<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!