PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRIMARY PRRODUCTIO N<br />
■<br />
FOLIAGE<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>ES AN D<br />
SEEDS<br />
r<br />
GRAZIN G<br />
VERTEBRATE S<br />
GRAZIN G<br />
INSECTS<br />
SUCKIN G<br />
INSECTS<br />
SEED AN D<br />
C<strong>ON</strong>E INSECTS<br />
f<br />
V<br />
PREDACEOU S<br />
BIRDS<br />
PARASITI C<br />
INVERTEBRATES<br />
PREDACEOUS<br />
INVERTEBRATE S<br />
Figure 2 . The major energy pathways between components of the forest canopy food chain .<br />
The paths of energy (fig. 2) may be<br />
followed beginning in the spring when th e<br />
buds of the conifers swell and insect herbivores<br />
emerge and feed . While they are small ,<br />
the grazing and sucking insects are preyed<br />
upon by other invertebrates . Later they are<br />
preyed upon by birds that switch from<br />
conifer seeds to insect larvae during thei r<br />
breeding season . Energy leaves the system in<br />
the form of food for predators in other foo d<br />
chains, migrating birds, detritus, and heat .<br />
The amounts of energy following these routes<br />
is not known yet . Consumption rates, relative<br />
densities of consumers, food quality variability,<br />
assimilation efficiencies, an d<br />
migration habits are also not known for mos t<br />
of the consumers . These problems will require<br />
further research before the model may b e<br />
quantified. The two diagrams and the definitions<br />
and assumptions that were outlined i n<br />
the preceding sections represent our curren t<br />
conceptual model of the canopy food chain .<br />
Interconnections with<br />
Other Subsystem s<br />
The conceptual model presented here of<br />
the forest canopy consumer subsystem ma y<br />
be used to describe possible interrelation s<br />
between it and other subsystems. By definition,<br />
this subsystem contains consumers tha t<br />
feed primarily in the forest canopy ; therefore ,<br />
we would not expect it to be tightly coupled<br />
to other food chains . However, since the food<br />
base defines the subsystem and, in the case of<br />
the canopy food chain, herbivores are mor e<br />
specific in food habits than the carnivores, it<br />
is evident that direct couplings will probabl y<br />
result from the feeding behavior of th e<br />
secondary consumers . For example, adul t<br />
insects from other subsystems may serve as<br />
food for flycatcher birds which live primaril y<br />
in the canopy . Predaceous invertebrates from<br />
the forest floor feed upon canopy specie s<br />
75