PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />
Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />
Nutrient cycling in throughf all<br />
and litterfall in 450-year-old<br />
Douglasfir stands<br />
Albert Abee<br />
an d<br />
Denis Lavender<br />
School of <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, Orego n<br />
Abstract<br />
Comparisons of nutrient concentrations (N, P, K+, Ca ++ , Mg++) found in canopy throughfall and litterfall<br />
were made on the H. J. <strong>Andrews</strong> <strong>Experimental</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>. Six old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii )<br />
stands were studied which represented six forest communities common to the western Cascades ofOregon. These<br />
community types span a large portion of the temperature and moisture gradients present in the area. The<br />
preliminary data indicate that nutrient concentration in throughfall was highest during the summer and fall, and<br />
lowest during the winter. Nutrient input through throughfall generally followed the same trends . Nutrient<br />
return through litterfall was greatest in the needles. More amounts of N, P, and Ca++ were transferred to the soil<br />
through litterfall than through throughfall, while more K + and Mg++ were added to the soil through throughfall.<br />
Litterfall was maximum during the winter. Future studies will correlate the results from the nutrient analysis to<br />
the moisture and temperature gradients .<br />
Introduction<br />
The worldwide interest of scientists in litterfall<br />
production during the past century, has<br />
been shown by Bray and Gorham (1964) i n<br />
their review of litter production in the forest s<br />
of the world. Methodology reports ranged<br />
from utilization of randomly located collection<br />
devices of varied design, separation, oven -<br />
drying, and chemical analysis of several litter<br />
components, to merely raking up and air drying<br />
the litter on a unit area basis. In spite of<br />
the large number of papers cited in the abov e<br />
review, data of litter production from natural ,<br />
old-growth ecosystems are meager. Even less<br />
is known about litterfall in old-growth<br />
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest<br />
types. The examination of seasonal fluctuations,<br />
nutrient concentration changes associated<br />
with defoliation, and nutrient composition<br />
of various litterfall categories are scarce<br />
(Kira and Shidei 1967) .<br />
The first published report of an investigation<br />
of litterfall in coniferous forests of the<br />
Pacific Northwest is that of Tarrant, Isaac ,<br />
and Chandler (1951). These workers collected<br />
the litter of several species for 1 year and estimated<br />
nutrient movement by multiplyin g<br />
litter weight by the percent elemental conten t<br />
of foliage collected from trees, an inexact procedure<br />
. More detailed measurements of th e<br />
nutrient cycle in Douglas-fir forests have bee n<br />
published for stands in New Zealand (Wil l<br />
1959) and the United States (Dimock 1958) .<br />
In addition, workers at both the University o f<br />
Washington (Rahman 1964) and Oregon Stat e<br />
University 1 have collected substantial dat a<br />
describing litterfall in both managed an d<br />
natural Douglas-fir stands . Riekerk and Gessel<br />
(1965) and Cole and Gessel (1968) summariz e<br />
1 D . P . Lavender, unpublished data .<br />
133