22.01.2014 Views

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

coast. Without the benefit of good photo -<br />

synthetic data, we used laboratory studie s<br />

conducted by our colleague, D . P. Lavender .<br />

Lavender found that the dry weight increas e<br />

of Douglas-fir seedlings was closely related to<br />

both air and soil temperatures . With these<br />

data a temperature-plant index was develope d<br />

by summing the potential growth possible for<br />

each day during the growing season (Cleary<br />

and Waring 1969) . Other variables were<br />

assumed nonlimiting. In the field, the Temperature<br />

Growth Index ranged from 30 near<br />

timberline to nearly 100 on oak and pin e<br />

forests. Douglas-fir was not found where th e<br />

index was below 40 .<br />

To visualize this information more effectively,<br />

the distributions of selected conifer s<br />

are presented in relation to these two rathe r<br />

simple plant response indices (fig. 4). The distributional<br />

patterns closely reflect the adapta -<br />

I . I . I I<br />

10 20 30<br />

PLANT MOISTURE STRESS, ATM .<br />

Figure 4 . Distribution of natural regeneration in relation<br />

to gradients of moisture and temperature de -<br />

fined by plant response indices (Waring 1970) .<br />

Validation stands, symbolized by 0, had vegetation<br />

predicted by the intercept of their plant<br />

response indices .<br />

tion of the various conifers . In a local region ,<br />

the variation in distribution of different<br />

species provides a means of predicting the environment<br />

through association with measurements<br />

taken on reference plants . The plan t<br />

response indices were correctly predicte d<br />

from knowledge of plant distributions fo r<br />

three validation stands, indicated as divide d<br />

circles in figure 4 . It is significant that suc h<br />

predictions are possible without physiological<br />

observations on species other than the reference<br />

plants and without special attention t o<br />

events controlling establishment . Once such<br />

relationships are established, the vegetatio n<br />

can provide understanding of the operational<br />

environment without requiring additional<br />

measurements of any kind . We shall expand<br />

this idea later .<br />

Measurement and Interpretation of<br />

Stomatal Respons e<br />

Conifer stomata are most difficult to observe,<br />

usually being sunken and occluded b y<br />

wax . The resistance which they offer to th e<br />

transfer of water vapor from the interior of<br />

the needles can be assessed by determinin g<br />

the rate of water vapor movement with a<br />

diffusion porometer (Waggoner and Turne r<br />

1971). The aperture of stomata may be estimated<br />

by observing the pressure necessary t o<br />

force a 50-percent ethanol solution through<br />

the pores (Fry and Walker 1967). Th e<br />

diffusion resistance is then determined by<br />

calibrating these pressures with reduction i n<br />

transpiration under known vapor pressure<br />

gradients (Reed 1971) . The latter procedure<br />

was followed in our past fieldwork . We found<br />

that stomatal resistance increased as the soi l<br />

moisture became less available during th e<br />

growing season . Further increase in stomatal<br />

resistance was possible during the day i f<br />

evaporative stress was high . These relationships<br />

were quantified and developed into a<br />

simulation model by Reed (1971) . Wit h<br />

knowledge of temperature, humidity, and<br />

nocturnal plant water stress, the model predicted<br />

on a daily basis, both potential transpiration<br />

(PT) and transpiration (T) wit h<br />

stomatal control . These values were summed<br />

for the entire season and confirmed the obser -<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!