PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the watershed as surface runoff, with 170 m m<br />
of this quantity occurring as baseflow . Th e<br />
soil moisture content computed by the mode l<br />
will be checked with observed data .<br />
Evapotranspiratio n<br />
Factors affecting evapotranspiration includ e<br />
temperature, solar radiation, wind, humidity ,<br />
and consumptive use by plants . However ,<br />
only temperature and humidity data are<br />
available for the watershed . Among the commonly<br />
used evapotranspiration equations<br />
(Veihmeyer 1964), the Penman equation i s<br />
perhaps the most rational, but the data requirements<br />
are extensive . For this reason, the<br />
modified Hargreaves (Veihmeyer 1964), will<br />
be used in this study . The equation is stated<br />
as follows .<br />
U =E Kd(0 .38-0.0038h)T a (4)<br />
in which<br />
U = the daily potential evapotranspiration<br />
in centimeters<br />
d = the daily daytime coefficient de -<br />
pendent upon latitud e<br />
h = the mean daily relative humidity at<br />
noon<br />
Ta = the mean daily surface air temperature<br />
in ° c<br />
K = a monthly consumptive use coefficient<br />
which is dependent upo n<br />
plant related characteristics, such a s<br />
species, growth stage, and densit y<br />
on the watershe d<br />
The influence of soil water on evapotranspiration<br />
has been the subject of much re -<br />
search and discussion . It is now generall y<br />
recognized that there is some reduction i n<br />
evapotranspiration rate as the quantity o f<br />
water within the root zone decreases . In this<br />
study it will be assumed that evapotranspiration<br />
occurs at the potential rate through a<br />
certain range of the available soil moisture . A<br />
critical moisture level is then reached at whic h<br />
actual transpiration begins to lag behind th e<br />
potential rate . Within this range of the avail -<br />
able soil moisture the relationship betwee n<br />
available water content and transpiration rat e<br />
will be assumed to be virtually linear . Thus,<br />
E = U, [Mes < Ms(t) < M cs] (5 )<br />
in which<br />
E = daily evapotranspiration adjuste d<br />
for the influence of soil moistur e<br />
levels<br />
M s quantity of water stored within th e<br />
root zone and available for plan t<br />
use at any time, t<br />
Mes limiting root zone available moisture<br />
content below which soil moisture<br />
tensions reduce evapotranspira -<br />
tion rates<br />
M cs root zone storage capacity of water<br />
available to plants<br />
M s (t)<br />
E = U [Mes > M s (t) >_ O] ( 6 )<br />
Mes<br />
Considering the pressure effect, the total rate<br />
of gravity water storage depletion through<br />
both interflow and deep percolation is<br />
assumed to be directly proportional to th e<br />
quantity of water in this form of storage remaining<br />
in the soil profile at any particula r<br />
time. The interflow portion of this depletion ,<br />
Nr, will be expressed as follows :<br />
Nr ( t) = Ki<br />
ddGs = Ki (Kg Gs (t) )<br />
in which<br />
K i = interflow depletion coefficien t<br />
Kg = gravity water depletion coefficien t<br />
-K t<br />
That is, Nr = KiKgGs(0)e g , in which gravity<br />
storage at time, t = 0 is represented b y<br />
Gs(0) and no input to Gs is assumed to occur<br />
between t = 0 and any other time, t . It is estimated<br />
that on watershed 2 about 90 percen t<br />
of the gravity water storage leaves the area as<br />
interflow, in which case KiKg = 0 .9 .<br />
Groundwater<br />
(7 )<br />
Water enters groundwater storage as dee p<br />
percolation from the overlying plant root<br />
zone. The rate of deep percolation, Gr, is<br />
numerically equal to the total rate of gravity<br />
water depletion within the root zone less th e<br />
interflow rate . Thus,<br />
58