PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
net assimilation in excised branches fro m<br />
24-year-old Douglas-fir trees which had been<br />
fertilized with N . However, the increases wer e<br />
noted only at light intensities of 2,000 ft- c<br />
and above .<br />
Diurnal and Seasonal Pattern s<br />
(including adaptation )<br />
Diurnal cycles or fluctuations in light, temperature,<br />
water vapor pressure gradients, an d<br />
other external factors are interactive with<br />
internal factors such as endogenous rhythm o f<br />
stomatal behavior, recovery from water deficit ,<br />
and translocation. Therefore the response of a<br />
tree day by day is very complex .<br />
Gentle (1963) and Helms (1965) studie d<br />
diurnal responses of 38-year-old Douglas-fir i n<br />
detail over a 4-year period . Superimposed o n<br />
the daily responses to light and darkness were<br />
short-term and longer term fluctuations attributable<br />
to varying temperature, radiation and<br />
cloud cover, relative humidity, water deficit,<br />
and undetermined influences . Midday depressions<br />
were common in the summer but also<br />
occurred in cool autumn weather . Similar detailed<br />
studies of diurnal behavior of the other<br />
species important in the Biome are lacking .<br />
The diurnal endogenous changes in stomatal<br />
aperture have been studied in several<br />
species. Fry (1965) noted that saplings grow n<br />
from seed gathered at Pack Demonstratio n<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>, La Grande, Washington, did no t<br />
exhibit any closing of the stomata during th e<br />
day or night if water status was favorable .<br />
This was largely confirmed by Reed (1968) ,<br />
although he observed a slight closing tendenc y<br />
at night. Phillips (1967) studied 38-year-old<br />
Douglas-fir trees at Pack Demonstration <strong>Forest</strong><br />
and found that the stomata of leaves i n<br />
the lower crown closed at night. A geographic<br />
or provenance difference in stomatal response<br />
of Douglas-fir was demonstrated in the field<br />
in southern Oregon, where stomata were open<br />
at night in the spring and early summer, but<br />
closed at night from July through September<br />
(Reed 1972). Drew, Drew, and Fritts (see<br />
footnote 4) and Lopushinsky (1969) independently<br />
observed that the stomata of Pinus<br />
ponderosa are closed at night . Abies amabilis<br />
growing in the field was observed to hav e<br />
more open stomata in early morning than did<br />
Abies procera, indicating that the stomata of<br />
A. amabilis were probably more open durin g<br />
the night (Hinckley 1971). The stomatal<br />
behavior of western hemlock is unknown an d<br />
needs attention .<br />
The influence of season of the year ha s<br />
already been touched on in connection with<br />
winter depression of assimilation . In a more<br />
general context, seasonal patterns of CO 2<br />
assimilation were studied by Gentle (1963)<br />
and by Helms (1964, 1965) in the 38-year-ol d<br />
Douglas-fir stand mentioned above . As would<br />
be expected, winter assimilation was low and<br />
quite variable, depending on the light an d<br />
temperature prevailing. Spring and autum n<br />
performances were good, although somewha t<br />
below the summer . Higher temperatures presumably<br />
made respiration a good deal highe r<br />
in the summer than in spring and autumn and .<br />
particularly than in the winter . Also Wood -<br />
man (1968, 1.971) studied net assimilation in<br />
one of the trees of this lame stand during th e<br />
growing season of 1967. A somewhat different<br />
pattern can be expected in conifers<br />
growing in regions with very dry summers ,<br />
with much Of the yearly total of photosynthesis<br />
occurring during the winter and spring .<br />
Such studies of seasonal patterns are imperative<br />
for adequate models of production in<br />
forest stands . This is particularly true becaus e<br />
a considerable number of variables in addition<br />
to those of the physical environment have<br />
marked influences (Kozlowski and, Kelle r<br />
1966). These include morphological variatio n<br />
(sun and shade foliage, stomatal distribution ,<br />
cuticular thickness, and others), adaptatio n<br />
with respect to light intensity and temperature<br />
in par icular, interspecific and intraspecific<br />
variations, shading, dormancy, age of<br />
foliage, position in the crown, and the natur e<br />
of past seasons . Some information on these<br />
features is available for Douglas-fir. However<br />
very limited knowledge, gained mostly fro m<br />
studies with seedlings, is available in this connection<br />
for the other species of special concern<br />
in the Coniferous Biome programwestern<br />
hemlock, ponderosa pine, and one of<br />
the true firs l Hodges and Scott 1968, Kruege r<br />
and Ruth 1969, Ludlow and Jarvis 1971b t<br />
217