22.01.2014 Views

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

PE EIE[R-Rg RESEARCH ON - HJ Andrews Experimental Forest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings-Research on Coniferous <strong>Forest</strong> Ecosystems-A symposium .<br />

Bellingham, Washington-March 23-24, 197 2<br />

Litter, foliage, branch, and ste m<br />

production in contrasting lodgepole<br />

pine habitats of the Colorado Front Rang e<br />

William H . Moir '<br />

Colorado State University<br />

A bstrac t<br />

Harvest data are presented from a 70-year-old naturally thinned stand of lodgepole pine (Pins contorta<br />

Dougl.) in the subalpine P . contorta/Vaccinium myrtillus habitat and from five stands of similar-aged lodgepole<br />

pine in the drier P . contorta/Geranium fremontii habitat. These latter stands include both naturally thinned and<br />

artificially uniform-thinned treatments . Stand structure, natural mortality, biomass components, growt h<br />

increments of stem wood, branches, and foliage, and net primary production of these materials are given in<br />

tables. Litter production over a 4-year period is also reported for each stand ; sources of variation in litte r<br />

production are discussed.<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>s of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta<br />

Dougl.) are extensive in the central and northern<br />

Rocky Mountains and portions of the<br />

Cascade Range . Studies on net primary production<br />

are lacking, however, in virtually al l<br />

habitats in which this pine is the major re -<br />

source. Biomass studies in certain lodgepole<br />

pine habitats in Alberta have been publishe d<br />

(Kiil 1968, Johnstone 1971), and in Colorado,<br />

the biomass of forest floor humus and<br />

pine foliage has been reported (Moir and Grier<br />

1969, Moir and Francis 1972) . These studies<br />

were not extended to net primary productivity<br />

. Our rather extensive knowledge of net<br />

stem wood production in the central Rocky<br />

Mountains (Myers 1967) does not reveal th e<br />

relationship between productivity and th e<br />

lodgepole pine habitats or include branch an d<br />

foliage production. I report below, therefore ,<br />

results of a 4-year study in Colorado concerning<br />

aspects of net primary productivity i n<br />

mostly 70-year-old natural stands of lodgepole<br />

pine .<br />

Methods<br />

Six stands on the east slopes of the Front<br />

Range in Boulder County, Colorado, wer e<br />

studied . Stand LH2 occurs in the subalpine P .<br />

contorta/Vaccinium myrtillus habitat; the<br />

others occur in the drier, montane P .<br />

contorta/Geranium fremontii habitat. Habitat<br />

features and pine population statistics ar e<br />

given by Moir (1969), Moir and Francis<br />

(1972), and table 1 . In each stand a rectangular<br />

study plot was established in an area<br />

where the forest structure appeared homogeneous.<br />

Plot size varied with stem density<br />

(table 1). Annual litter fall was periodicall y<br />

measured from randomized 0 .25 m 2 micro -<br />

plots permanently located within each plo t<br />

(Moir and Grier 1969) . All surface organi c<br />

material in the microplots was collected a t<br />

4-month intervals in 1969, and in late August,<br />

the remaining years . Mineral contamination a t<br />

collection was minimized by computing litter<br />

'Present address: Box 31, Rodeo, New Mexico<br />

88056 .<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!