22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

W2-E.2 Toccalino, PL*; Gilliom, RJ; Lindsey, BD; Rupert, MG;<br />

U.S. Geological Survey; ptocca@usgs.gov<br />

Pesticides in groundwater of the United States:<br />

Occurrence and decadal-scale changes<br />

This study by the U.S. Geological Survey’s National<br />

Water-Quality Assessment Program evaluated (1) the<br />

occurrence of pesticides in groundwater and (2) decadal-scale<br />

changes in pesticide concentrations over a 20-year period.<br />

Untreated groundwater samples were collected from 1,309<br />

wells located in 60 nationally distributed well networks and<br />

analyzed <strong>for</strong> as many as 83 pesticide compounds. Each well<br />

network was sampled once during 1993–2001 (Cycle 1) and<br />

once during 2002–2011 (Cycle 2). Shallow (mostly monitoring)<br />

wells were sampled in agricultural and urban areas. Deeper<br />

(mostly domestic and public) wells, which tap major aquifers<br />

used <strong>for</strong> water supply, were sampled in mixed land-use areas.<br />

Pesticides were frequently detected—about two-thirds of the<br />

samples from agricultural areas and about half of the samples<br />

from urban areas contained one or more pesticides. More than<br />

one-third of samples from major aquifers contained one or more<br />

pesticides, but concentrations seldom (about 1% of samples)<br />

exceeded human-health benchmarks. The five most frequently<br />

detected pesticide compounds—atrazine, deethylatrazine,<br />

simazine, metolachlor, and prometon—each were detected in<br />

9% to 36% of all samples, and each had statistically significant<br />

changes in concentrations between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 in one<br />

or more land uses. For all agricultural land-use networks<br />

combined, concentrations of atrazine, metolachlor, and<br />

prometon decreased from Cycle 1 to Cycle 2; prometon<br />

concentrations also decreased in urban areas. Conversely, <strong>for</strong><br />

all major aquifers combined, concentrations of atrazine,<br />

deethylatrazine, and simazine increased; deethylatrazine<br />

concentrations also increased in urban areas. The magnitude of<br />

these concentration changes from decade to decade was small,<br />

and ranged from 0.001 to 0.09 µg/L (35- to 230,000-fold less<br />

than benchmarks). More than half of the individual well<br />

networks showed statistically significant changes in one or<br />

more pesticide concentrations between Cycles 1 and 2.<br />

P.13 Tokai, A*; Nakazawa, K; Nakakubo, T; Yamaguchi, H;<br />

Kojima, N; Sakagami, M; Higuchi, Y; Nagata, Y; Ishimaru, T;<br />

Osaka University; tokai@see.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp<br />

Development of practical risk evaluation method with the<br />

example of traffic relevant environmental measures<br />

Under the multiple risk situations in our daily life, to<br />

understand the actual risk condition goes underground the<br />

revealed risk is necessary. To grasp it, we examined the method<br />

that make up the result of traditional health risk assessment.<br />

For this purpose, we identified three objectives in this research<br />

project. The first one is to develop risk durability evaluation<br />

method and the second one is to apply this method to actual<br />

environmental measures especially we examined the<br />

transportation related technologies. The third one is to examine<br />

the possibility of voluntary action <strong>for</strong> risk reduction by citizens<br />

through questionnaire survey to residents in Osaka prefecture.<br />

Main findings were followings. Regarding first task, we<br />

developed risk durability evaluation method based on the<br />

concept of value of in<strong>for</strong>mation and trade-off analysis with the<br />

example of flame retardant to plastics with the software<br />

Analytica. This software enables us to build user friendly model<br />

that support to obtain the insight of risk stems from this<br />

chemical through graphical user interface. To analyze the<br />

uncertainty included in the process of risk assessment of flame<br />

retardant, we estimated value of in<strong>for</strong>mation of specific<br />

parameter required <strong>for</strong> risk estimation. As to the second task,<br />

we carried out the risk analysis and lifecycle analysis <strong>for</strong> three<br />

types of environmental measures <strong>for</strong> automobile industry, they<br />

are material substitutions, fuel substitutions and products<br />

replacement. We clarified the risk trade-offs <strong>for</strong> these three<br />

types of measures and evaluated relative superiority from the<br />

viewpoint of health risk and greenhouse gas emission.<br />

Regarding third task, results of 232 valid respondents who<br />

were aged 20 or over and lived in Osaka prefecture were<br />

obtained.<br />

W2-K.2 Tonn, GL*; Guikema, SD; Johns Hopkins University;<br />

gtonn2@jhu.edu<br />

Power outage analysis <strong>for</strong> Hurricane Isaac<br />

In August 2012, Hurricane Isaac, a Category 2 hurricane,<br />

caused extensive power outages in Louisiana. The storm<br />

brought high winds, storm surge and flooding to Louisiana, and<br />

power outages were extensive and prolonged. Hourly power<br />

outage data <strong>for</strong> the state of Louisiana was collected during the<br />

storm and analyzed. This analysis included correlation of hourly<br />

power outage figures by zip code with wind, rainfall, and storm<br />

surge. Results were analyzed to understand how drivers <strong>for</strong><br />

power outages differed geographically within the state.<br />

Hurricane Isaac differed from many hurricanes due to the<br />

significant storm surge and flooding. This analysis provided<br />

insight on how rainfall and storm surge, along with wind,<br />

contribute to risk of power outages in hurricanes. The results of<br />

this analysis can be used to better understand hurricane power<br />

outage risk and better prepare <strong>for</strong> future storms. It will also be<br />

used to improve the accuracy and robustness of a power outage<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecasting model developed at Johns Hopkins University.<br />

W4-F.3 Tonn, BE*; Stiefel, D; Feldman, D; University of<br />

Tennessee-Knoxville; dori@utk.edu<br />

Past the threshold <strong>for</strong> existential risks: Balancing<br />

existential risk uncertainty and governance<br />

Concerns about the potential extinction of the human race are<br />

growing. This paper addresses those concerns, and builds on<br />

previous research in that area, by presenting research into the<br />

conditions under which society ought to implement actions to<br />

reduce existential risk. This paper answers the question, “How<br />

do types of governance help or hinder society’s response to<br />

existential risks?” Specifically, this paper explores the balance<br />

between uncertainty; actions to reduce existential risk;<br />

philosophical perspectives about existential risk; and types of<br />

governance, with special attention <strong>for</strong> the role of complex<br />

adaptive systems. This paper presents two Frameworks <strong>for</strong><br />

addressing those concerns. The first framework, the<br />

Framework <strong>for</strong> Implementing Actions to Reduce Existential<br />

<strong>Risk</strong>, answers the question, “Under what conditions ought<br />

society implement actions to reduce existential risk?” The<br />

second framework, the Framework <strong>for</strong> Governance Responses<br />

to Reduce Existential <strong>Risk</strong>, is based on types of governance and<br />

extends the first framework from the perspectives of fragile,<br />

rigid, robust, and flexible governance structures with special<br />

attention <strong>for</strong> the role of complex adaptive systems. Specifically,<br />

the second framework provides the foundational perspectives<br />

from which to identify the ways in which society’s actions might<br />

be helped or hindered by actual or perceived complications of<br />

governance. Support <strong>for</strong> different categories of actions to<br />

reduce existential risk are different across these governance<br />

types, as are the rates at which they help or hinder the societal<br />

response. The paper concludes with an assessment of the<br />

overall challenges and opportunities revealed by these<br />

frameworks. The paper also provides recommendations <strong>for</strong><br />

reducing existential risk given governance types and the role of<br />

complex adaptive systems.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!