Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />
W2-D.4 Davidson, VJ*; Kenny, MF; Fazil, A; Cahill, S; Clarke,<br />
R; VJD University of Guelph, MFK Food & Agricultural<br />
Organization of the United Nations, AF Public Health Agency of<br />
Canada, SC FAO, RC FAO; vdavidso@uoguelph.ca<br />
MCDA-ranking of food safety issues to in<strong>for</strong>m<br />
policy-makers in Uganda<br />
In 2012, the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United<br />
Nations (FAO) initiated a project to develop improved tools <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong>mulating food safety policies based on broad consideration of<br />
multiple risk factors. The approach has been to work at country<br />
level initially and the first pilot country study is taking place in<br />
Uganda in parallel with a study being conducted by the World<br />
Health Organization Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology<br />
Reference Group (FERG) and the Ministry of Health, Uganda.<br />
Evidence developed by the WHO/FERG study about health risks<br />
is integrated with in<strong>for</strong>mation about economic, social and food<br />
security risks that are associated with foodborne hazards in<br />
Uganda. A series of workshops have been conducted to develop<br />
the risk criteria and metrics that are relevant in Uganda.<br />
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools are used to<br />
prioritize food safety issues resulting from biological and<br />
chemical hazards in different food sources. The MCDA tools<br />
provide transparency in terms of factors considered and<br />
weighting of individual risk criteria. The overall goal of the FAO<br />
project is to bring together rigorous evidence about public<br />
health, economic, social and food security risks as a solid<br />
foundation <strong>for</strong> developing food safety policies in Uganda.<br />
Experiences from Uganda as a pilot country will illustrate the<br />
feasibility and use of multi-criteria approaches in a developing<br />
country context and in<strong>for</strong>m the development of FAO guidance<br />
and tools with global application.<br />
M3-G.1 Demuth, JL; NCAR and CSU; jdemuth@ucar.edu<br />
Examining the role of personal experience on weather<br />
risk perceptions and responses<br />
As Hurricane Sandy took aim at New Jersey in October 2012,<br />
many residents likely recalled their experiences with Tropical<br />
Storm Irene which made landfall nearby only a year earlier.<br />
This is but one example of a hazardous weather situation in<br />
which in one’s past hazard experience is a relevant and<br />
potentially critical factor that influences how one responds to a<br />
future weather risk. Hazardous weather is common relative to<br />
risks posed by many other types of natural hazards (e.g.,<br />
earthquakes, wildfires, tsunamis), offering people many<br />
opportunities to build reservoirs of experiences with <strong>for</strong>ecasts<br />
of the event as well as with the event itself, which they can then<br />
apply to future threats. It is generally thought that past<br />
experience influences one’s recognition of, perceptions of, and<br />
beliefs about a risk, which increases their behavioral motivation<br />
and intentions to protect oneself and thereby one’s actual<br />
response behaviors. Yet the empirical literature reveals mixed<br />
findings, with experience having a positive, negative, or lack of<br />
influence. Part of the reason <strong>for</strong> these mixed results may be<br />
that past hazard experience has been both simply and<br />
inconsistently conceptualized and measured. This presentation<br />
will briefly summarize how past hazard experience has been<br />
operationalized in the context of tornado, hurricane, and flood<br />
risks, and how experience has been shown empirically to relate<br />
to people’s risk perceptions and responses. Then, it will suggest<br />
a fuller, more valid way of characterizing this important risk<br />
construct.<br />
T1-B.3 Denison, R; Environmental Defense Fund;<br />
rdenison@edf.org<br />
IRIS Improvements: Getting the Balance Right in<br />
Scientific Quality, Timeliness, Stakeholder Engagement<br />
and Peer Review<br />
Over the past several years, EPA’s IRIS program has been<br />
plagued with controversy, whipsawed by the differing demands<br />
and priorities of various stakeholders. As it struggles to regain<br />
its footing, IRIS must undertake the difficult task of striking the<br />
right balance between three sets of competing objectives:<br />
achieving acceptable scientific quality versus ensuring<br />
timeliness of its assessments; providing sufficient transparency<br />
and “due process” versus ensuring its process delivers<br />
balanced stakeholder input; and tapping necessary expertise<br />
versus avoiding conflicts of interest in peer review of its<br />
assessments. In this presentation I will first describe how the<br />
problems IRIS has faced in recent years can be traced to a lack<br />
of balance across these three sets of competing objectives. I<br />
will then examine recent enhancements in the IRIS program<br />
through the lens of how well they achieve the needed balance.<br />
T2-E.2 Dennerlein, T; Rodriguez, D; MacDonald-Gibson, J*;<br />
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;<br />
jackie.macdonald@unc.edu<br />
Predicting the Effects of Urban Design on Public Health:<br />
A Case Study in Raleigh, North Carolina<br />
The rise in obesity and chronic diseases in the United States<br />
has been partially attributed to decreased physical activity from<br />
lack of pedestrian-friendly urban designs. This project presents<br />
a framework to predict the health benefits of neighborhood<br />
designs that increase physical activity. The framework employs<br />
the principles of risk assessment, using measures of the built<br />
environment in place of the pollutant doses employed in<br />
conventional environmental pollutant risk assessments. We<br />
constructed a model to simulate pedestrian “exposure” to urban<br />
<strong>for</strong>m characteristics associated with increased physical activity<br />
and then to connect this exposure to “dose-response” functions<br />
that relate physical activity to health outcomes. We<br />
demonstrate the model in a case study neighborhood in<br />
Raleigh, North Carolina, <strong>for</strong> which the City Council recently<br />
commissioned a new small-area plan intended to promote<br />
non-motorized transportation. Like much of Raleigh, this<br />
neighborhood is experiencing rapid growth; the current<br />
population of 10,400 is projected to reach 59,750 by 2040. We<br />
estimate that proposed built environment modifications would<br />
double the time neighborhood residents spend walking <strong>for</strong><br />
transportation, when compared to current conditions. By the<br />
year 2040, this increased physical activity is expected to<br />
decrease the annual number of premature deaths by 6 (95% CI:<br />
3-8) and the annual cases of four chronic diseases by 680 (95%<br />
CI: 400-900). This project is the first to provide a quantitative<br />
prediction of the health impacts of urban design in North<br />
Carolina. It shows that simple urban design changes could<br />
significantly improve the health of communities.<br />
December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD