22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

W2-D.4 Davidson, VJ*; Kenny, MF; Fazil, A; Cahill, S; Clarke,<br />

R; VJD University of Guelph, MFK Food & Agricultural<br />

Organization of the United Nations, AF Public Health Agency of<br />

Canada, SC FAO, RC FAO; vdavidso@uoguelph.ca<br />

MCDA-ranking of food safety issues to in<strong>for</strong>m<br />

policy-makers in Uganda<br />

In 2012, the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United<br />

Nations (FAO) initiated a project to develop improved tools <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>mulating food safety policies based on broad consideration of<br />

multiple risk factors. The approach has been to work at country<br />

level initially and the first pilot country study is taking place in<br />

Uganda in parallel with a study being conducted by the World<br />

Health Organization Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology<br />

Reference Group (FERG) and the Ministry of Health, Uganda.<br />

Evidence developed by the WHO/FERG study about health risks<br />

is integrated with in<strong>for</strong>mation about economic, social and food<br />

security risks that are associated with foodborne hazards in<br />

Uganda. A series of workshops have been conducted to develop<br />

the risk criteria and metrics that are relevant in Uganda.<br />

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools are used to<br />

prioritize food safety issues resulting from biological and<br />

chemical hazards in different food sources. The MCDA tools<br />

provide transparency in terms of factors considered and<br />

weighting of individual risk criteria. The overall goal of the FAO<br />

project is to bring together rigorous evidence about public<br />

health, economic, social and food security risks as a solid<br />

foundation <strong>for</strong> developing food safety policies in Uganda.<br />

Experiences from Uganda as a pilot country will illustrate the<br />

feasibility and use of multi-criteria approaches in a developing<br />

country context and in<strong>for</strong>m the development of FAO guidance<br />

and tools with global application.<br />

M3-G.1 Demuth, JL; NCAR and CSU; jdemuth@ucar.edu<br />

Examining the role of personal experience on weather<br />

risk perceptions and responses<br />

As Hurricane Sandy took aim at New Jersey in October 2012,<br />

many residents likely recalled their experiences with Tropical<br />

Storm Irene which made landfall nearby only a year earlier.<br />

This is but one example of a hazardous weather situation in<br />

which in one’s past hazard experience is a relevant and<br />

potentially critical factor that influences how one responds to a<br />

future weather risk. Hazardous weather is common relative to<br />

risks posed by many other types of natural hazards (e.g.,<br />

earthquakes, wildfires, tsunamis), offering people many<br />

opportunities to build reservoirs of experiences with <strong>for</strong>ecasts<br />

of the event as well as with the event itself, which they can then<br />

apply to future threats. It is generally thought that past<br />

experience influences one’s recognition of, perceptions of, and<br />

beliefs about a risk, which increases their behavioral motivation<br />

and intentions to protect oneself and thereby one’s actual<br />

response behaviors. Yet the empirical literature reveals mixed<br />

findings, with experience having a positive, negative, or lack of<br />

influence. Part of the reason <strong>for</strong> these mixed results may be<br />

that past hazard experience has been both simply and<br />

inconsistently conceptualized and measured. This presentation<br />

will briefly summarize how past hazard experience has been<br />

operationalized in the context of tornado, hurricane, and flood<br />

risks, and how experience has been shown empirically to relate<br />

to people’s risk perceptions and responses. Then, it will suggest<br />

a fuller, more valid way of characterizing this important risk<br />

construct.<br />

T1-B.3 Denison, R; Environmental Defense Fund;<br />

rdenison@edf.org<br />

IRIS Improvements: Getting the Balance Right in<br />

Scientific Quality, Timeliness, Stakeholder Engagement<br />

and Peer Review<br />

Over the past several years, EPA’s IRIS program has been<br />

plagued with controversy, whipsawed by the differing demands<br />

and priorities of various stakeholders. As it struggles to regain<br />

its footing, IRIS must undertake the difficult task of striking the<br />

right balance between three sets of competing objectives:<br />

achieving acceptable scientific quality versus ensuring<br />

timeliness of its assessments; providing sufficient transparency<br />

and “due process” versus ensuring its process delivers<br />

balanced stakeholder input; and tapping necessary expertise<br />

versus avoiding conflicts of interest in peer review of its<br />

assessments. In this presentation I will first describe how the<br />

problems IRIS has faced in recent years can be traced to a lack<br />

of balance across these three sets of competing objectives. I<br />

will then examine recent enhancements in the IRIS program<br />

through the lens of how well they achieve the needed balance.<br />

T2-E.2 Dennerlein, T; Rodriguez, D; MacDonald-Gibson, J*;<br />

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;<br />

jackie.macdonald@unc.edu<br />

Predicting the Effects of Urban Design on Public Health:<br />

A Case Study in Raleigh, North Carolina<br />

The rise in obesity and chronic diseases in the United States<br />

has been partially attributed to decreased physical activity from<br />

lack of pedestrian-friendly urban designs. This project presents<br />

a framework to predict the health benefits of neighborhood<br />

designs that increase physical activity. The framework employs<br />

the principles of risk assessment, using measures of the built<br />

environment in place of the pollutant doses employed in<br />

conventional environmental pollutant risk assessments. We<br />

constructed a model to simulate pedestrian “exposure” to urban<br />

<strong>for</strong>m characteristics associated with increased physical activity<br />

and then to connect this exposure to “dose-response” functions<br />

that relate physical activity to health outcomes. We<br />

demonstrate the model in a case study neighborhood in<br />

Raleigh, North Carolina, <strong>for</strong> which the City Council recently<br />

commissioned a new small-area plan intended to promote<br />

non-motorized transportation. Like much of Raleigh, this<br />

neighborhood is experiencing rapid growth; the current<br />

population of 10,400 is projected to reach 59,750 by 2040. We<br />

estimate that proposed built environment modifications would<br />

double the time neighborhood residents spend walking <strong>for</strong><br />

transportation, when compared to current conditions. By the<br />

year 2040, this increased physical activity is expected to<br />

decrease the annual number of premature deaths by 6 (95% CI:<br />

3-8) and the annual cases of four chronic diseases by 680 (95%<br />

CI: 400-900). This project is the first to provide a quantitative<br />

prediction of the health impacts of urban design in North<br />

Carolina. It shows that simple urban design changes could<br />

significantly improve the health of communities.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!