22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

T1-A.4 HERRERA, DA; Toulouse School of Economics;<br />

daniel.herrera@tse-fr.eu<br />

To <strong>for</strong>tify or not, a structural analysis of the public<br />

advisory policy on folic acid in France<br />

This paper analyzes consumer’s response to the French<br />

advisory policy on folic acid. The advisory was issued in 2005 in<br />

order to warn pregnant women or women who plan to become<br />

pregnant about the perils of a poor diet and the bad health<br />

consequences to their offspring. The advisory specifically<br />

mentions the peril of neural tube diseases (NTDs) that would<br />

result from a deficiency of folic acid. We are interested in how<br />

consumers responded to the advisory policy. We investigate<br />

consumers’ responses in terms of their demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>tified<br />

ready-to-eat breakfast cereals making use of structural<br />

difference in difference (DiD) methods. Even though the<br />

prevalence of NTDs did not change after the introduction of the<br />

advisory policy, we find evidence of a positive effect on at-risk<br />

consumers’ demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>tified cereals. Fortification is,<br />

however, controversial because it may have potential side<br />

effects including cancer and neurotoxic effects in individuals’<br />

aged 50 or older. We there<strong>for</strong>e provide a welfare assessment of<br />

a <strong>for</strong>tification policy in France. We find that the benefits of<br />

<strong>for</strong>tification outweigh the costs by a large amount.<br />

T4-B.5 Hertzberg, RC*; Burkhardt, EA; MacDonell, MM; Emory<br />

University; hertzberg@comcast.net<br />

Special Considerations <strong>for</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Characterization in a<br />

Cumulative <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment<br />

The final step in a cumulative risk assessment (CRA) is the<br />

characterization of the risks. The step synthesizes in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

gathered in evaluating exposures to stressors together with<br />

dose-response relationships, inherent characteristics of those<br />

being exposed, as well as external environmental conditions. A<br />

cumulative risk characterization differs from a classical,<br />

chemical risk characterization in five important ways: the focus<br />

is on a population instead of a pollution source, exposures<br />

include chemicals along with environmental conditions and<br />

nonchemical stressors, the stressors and health effects are<br />

multidimensional, the complexity is partly handled by<br />

simplifying procedures and assumptions, and the uncertainty<br />

analysis is critical. CRAs also emphasize the involvement of not<br />

just risk scientists but also stakeholders and risk managers,<br />

especially in the planning, scoping and problem <strong>for</strong>mulation<br />

step where assessment goals are decided. The characterization<br />

also includes an evaluation of how successful the assessment<br />

was in achieving those goals. This presentation illustrates these<br />

differences with case study examples, and shows how<br />

uncertainty analysis can be applied to indices and maps, two of<br />

the more common ways of communicating cumulative risks.<br />

P.58 Heyl, ME*; Moyano, E; Cornejo, F; Cifuentes, LA; Faculty<br />

of Enginnering, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile;<br />

marianne.heyl@gmail.com<br />

Environmental attitudes and behaviours of university<br />

students: A case of study at an Chilean university.<br />

Encouraging the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour is<br />

critical to reduce the environmental impacts and to move<br />

toward a more sustainable future. Higher education plays an<br />

important role in educate and <strong>for</strong>m professionals who will play<br />

an important role in protecting the environment through their<br />

decision and behaviours in their personal and professionals<br />

lives. The aim of this study is to identify whether there are<br />

significant differences between university students depending<br />

on the diploma of specialisation, related to the environment or<br />

not, the year in which they are studying and gender. Besides to<br />

investigate which factors influence significantly (perceived<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t, positive environmental attitude or perceives positive<br />

consequents) the frequency of pro-environmental behaviours in<br />

the students. The sample consisted of 383 students in first,<br />

third and sixth year by which two instruments were designed to<br />

measure environmental attitudes and behaviours. Significant<br />

differences were noted between those who are studying<br />

diplomas related to the environment and those who aren’t, as<br />

opposed to the variations at different stages of the course.<br />

However, students have positive environmental attitudes which<br />

are not reflected in the per<strong>for</strong>mance of environmental<br />

behaviour. Upon conducting regression analysis, it is noted that<br />

the three factors influence significantly the frequency of<br />

pro-environmental behaviour, being the perceived ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

(negative) the most influential variable.<br />

T1-D.2 Hill, AA*; Kosmider, RD; Dewe, T; Kelly, L; De Nardi,<br />

M; Havelaar, A; Von Dobscheutz, S; Stevens, K; Staerk, K;<br />

Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Royal<br />

Veterinary College, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle<br />

Venezie; andrew.hill@ahvla.gsi.gov.uk<br />

Modelling the species jump: spatially ranking influenza A<br />

virus ability to cross species barrier and infect humans<br />

One of the most notorious group of zoonotic pathogens are<br />

Influenza A viruses. Historically, avian influenza viruses have<br />

been of primary concern as they were responsible <strong>for</strong> the<br />

pandemics in 1918 (“Spanish flu”), 1967 (Hong Kong) and 2009<br />

(“Swine flu”).The latter outbreak has challenged the ethos of<br />

Influenza A pandemic preparedness and highlights the<br />

importance of taking a broader approach to the problem. The<br />

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has commissioned an<br />

Article 36 research project to develop a more <strong>for</strong>mal approach<br />

to the identification of animal influenza A strains that have the<br />

potential to make the species jump into humans. We propose a<br />

prototype risk assessment framework to spatially rank<br />

Influenza A viruses circulating in animal populations <strong>for</strong> their<br />

potential to jump the species barriers to humans. We use a<br />

modified version of the classical epidemiological risk equation<br />

to estimate the risk of at least one human infection (given an<br />

infected livestock population) within a 5km2 area. The output<br />

will be a list of ranked animal viruses that could have the<br />

potential to infect humans in certain areas of the globe and,<br />

hence, may have pandemic potential. The intention is <strong>for</strong> the<br />

model to be eventually used regularly to prioritise<br />

research/surveillance <strong>for</strong> animal influenzas in higher risk areas<br />

of the globe. We will present initial spatial ranking results of<br />

the framework model <strong>for</strong> historic strains (validation) and<br />

hypothetical strains to illustrate the important issues and<br />

drivers of the model.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!