22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

W4-F.5 Wiener, JB; Duke University; wiener@law.duke.edu<br />

Global <strong>Risk</strong>s, Catastrophes, Crises, Regulation and<br />

Liability<br />

Global catastrophic risks pose several challenges <strong>for</strong><br />

governance. This presentation takes a comparative institutional<br />

approach to different legal/policy measures <strong>for</strong> such risks,<br />

notably the classic alternatives of regulation and liability. Ex<br />

ante regulation may be precautionary, but faces challenges<br />

including priority-setting, benefit-cost judgments, risk-risk<br />

tradeoffs, and the political psychology of mobilizing regulatory<br />

action to address a future catastrophic risk. As to mobilizing<br />

action, collective action problems pose serious hurdles <strong>for</strong><br />

global regulation; and although crisis events can spur demand<br />

<strong>for</strong> regulation, global catastrophes may lack antecedent crises<br />

as a basis <strong>for</strong> institutional learning, and not all types of crises<br />

may spur effective types of regulatory responses. Ex post<br />

liability may be compensatory and deterrent, but faces<br />

challenges including <strong>for</strong>eseeability, proving causation, multiple<br />

plaintiffs and defendants, sovereign immunity, defendants not<br />

subject to national or international courts' jurisdictions,<br />

damages valuation, damages exceeding tortfeasors' assets, and<br />

the catastrophe itself disabling the institutions of liability.<br />

These alternatives and their challenges will be illustrated with<br />

examples such as "back contamination" from outer space,<br />

climate change, and geoengineering. The presentation draws<br />

on the author's involvement in research projects on "The<br />

Tragedy of the Uncommons" and on "Recalibrating <strong>Risk</strong>: Crises,<br />

Perceptions and Regulatory Responses."<br />

P.141 Wilkie, A*; Datko-Williams, L; Richmond-Bryant, J;<br />

ORISE; U.S. EPA; wilkie.adrien@epa.gov<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> of U.S. soil lead (Pb) studies from 1970-2012<br />

Although lead (Pb) emissions to the air have substantially<br />

decreased in the United States since the phase-out of leaded<br />

gasoline completed in 1995, amounts of Pb in some soils remain<br />

elevated. Lead concentrations in residential and recreational<br />

soils are of concern because health effects have been<br />

associated with Pb exposure. Elevated soil Pb is especially<br />

harmful to young children due to their higher likelihood of soil<br />

ingestion. In this study, U.S. soil Pb data published from 1970<br />

through 2012 was compiled and analyzed to reveal spatial<br />

and/or temporal soil Pb trends in the U.S. over the past 40<br />

years. A total of 84 soil Pb studies across 62 U.S. cities were<br />

evaluated. Median soil Pb values from the studies were<br />

analyzed with respect to year of sampling, residential location<br />

type (e.g., urban, suburban), and population density. In<br />

aggregate, there was no statistically significant correlation<br />

between year and median soil Pb; however, within single cities,<br />

soil Pb generally declined over time. Our analysis shows that<br />

soil Pb quantities in city centers were generally highest and<br />

declined towards the suburbs and exurbs of the city. In<br />

addition, there was a statistically significant, positive<br />

relationship between median soil Pb and population density. In<br />

general, the trends examined here align with previously<br />

reported conclusions that soil Pb levels are higher in larger<br />

urban areas and Pb tends to remain in soil <strong>for</strong> long periods of<br />

time. The views expressed in this abstract are those of the<br />

authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies<br />

of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.<br />

W2-A.2 Williams, RA; Mercatus Center at George Mason<br />

University; RWilliams@mercatus.gmu.edu<br />

Too Many Rules, Too Much <strong>Risk</strong><br />

<strong>Risk</strong> assessment is per<strong>for</strong>med to aid in deciding where<br />

interventions in markets can act to reduce risks. <strong>Risk</strong><br />

assessments typically address individual hazards and either one<br />

or multiple sources of exposure. These risk assessments in<strong>for</strong>m<br />

federal regulations, which act in conjunction with state, local<br />

and even private rules. Even prior to the widespread<br />

introduction of risk analysis however, governments were<br />

establishing rules in the attempt to reduce risk. Some rules are<br />

over 100 years old. These rules are rarely changed and almost<br />

never removed, despite a rapidly changing society. At the<br />

federal level, this has resulted in 170,000 pages of rules with<br />

mandatory requirements, to do or refrain from doing<br />

something, at well over 1 million. Twenty five years ago<br />

Elizabeth Nichols and Aaron Wildavsky reported that multiple<br />

rules and safety systems were responsible <strong>for</strong> nuclear power<br />

plants being less safe as rules and systems began to interfere<br />

with one another – a “major contributing factor” in the<br />

Chernobyl accident. With more research, we are beginning to<br />

uncover other reasons that the idea that more rules equal more<br />

safety, the “linearity” assumption, may be wrong. For example,<br />

recent research by industrial psychologists shows that<br />

excessive amounts of rules turns plant employees into<br />

automatons following excessive, prescriptive rules rather than<br />

being aware of new threats and solving problems. Even when<br />

trying to follow rules, equal weighting on rules of widely<br />

differing effectiveness causes less attention to be paid to the<br />

serious ones.<br />

P.35 Williams, BH*; Pierce, JS; Glynn, ME; Johns, LE; Adhikari,<br />

R; Finley, BL; Cardno Chem<strong>Risk</strong>;<br />

Brenten.Williams@cardno.com<br />

Residential and Occupational Exposure to Wood Treating<br />

Operations and <strong>Risk</strong> of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A<br />

Meta-<strong>Analysis</strong><br />

There are hundreds of <strong>for</strong>mer and currently active wood<br />

treating facilities in the United States, and over time concerns<br />

have been raised regarding the potential chronic health effects<br />

associated with wood treating-related exposures. It has been<br />

suggested in the peer-reviewed literature that exposure to<br />

chemicals related to historical wood treating operations (in<br />

particular, pentachlorophenol [PCP]) is associated with an<br />

increased risk in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). To test the<br />

merits of this assertion, we conducted a systematic review of all<br />

published and unpublished analyses that report risk estimates<br />

<strong>for</strong> NHL in (1) residents of communities surrounding wood<br />

treating operations, (2) wood treating workers, and (3)<br />

non-wood treating workers who were exposed to chemicals<br />

associated with wood treating operations (creosote, coal tar<br />

and associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs] and<br />

PCP). A total of 12 studies, including independent cohort,<br />

record-linkage, and case-control studies, were included in the<br />

meta-analysis. Using a random effects model, meta-relative<br />

risks (meta-RRs) were calculated <strong>for</strong> each exposure group. The<br />

summary relative risk (meta-RR) <strong>for</strong> NHL overall was 1.31 (95%<br />

confidence interval [CI]: 0.93, 1.85). No statistically significant<br />

meta-RRs were observed among residents of communities in<br />

the vicinity of wood treating facilities (meta-RR=0.75; 95% CI:<br />

0.37, 1.51); wood treating workers (meta-RR=1.89; 95% CI:<br />

0.69, 4.12); workers exposed to coal tar, creosote, and<br />

associated PAHs (meta-RR=1.37; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.34); and<br />

workers exposed to PCP (meta-RR=1.61; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.62).<br />

Notably, many of the occupational studies, and in particular<br />

those conducted among manufacturing workers, were limited<br />

by the inability to distinguish the potential confounding effects<br />

of contaminants, particularly polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins<br />

(PCDDs), within chlorophenols. Nevertheless, there is no<br />

evidence in the studies reviewed that residential or<br />

occupational exposures related to wood treating operations<br />

increase the risk of NHL.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!