22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

M3-J.4 Murphy, PM; George Washington University;<br />

murph@gwu.edu<br />

Electricity and development: A risk based analysis of grid<br />

extension and distributed energy resources.<br />

More than 1.3 billion people – 20% of the world’s population -<br />

lack access to an electricity grid. Fewer than 4% people and<br />

enterprises in the rural developing world are connected to a<br />

grid. As energy access is critical <strong>for</strong> economic development this<br />

has huge impacts on current and potential development. There<br />

has been much analysis and ef<strong>for</strong>t towards determining when<br />

and where grid extension or distributed energy resources<br />

(DER)are more economical <strong>for</strong> addressing this challenge, but<br />

what all of these analyses lack is an understanding that even<br />

where the grid reaches in the developing world it is not<br />

reliable. Blackouts are common and lengthy. The trade-off is<br />

not necessarily just between bulk grid and DER, but whether<br />

both are necessary, af<strong>for</strong>dable and optimal <strong>for</strong> supporting near<br />

term and long term development. This research will (1) provide<br />

a brief examination of the importance of electricity <strong>for</strong><br />

development; (2) review some of the past work in grid power<br />

vs. DER; (3) provide some context <strong>for</strong> the lack of reliability in<br />

the developing world’s electricity infrastructure; and finally (3)<br />

provide recommendations <strong>for</strong> modifying grid vs. DER analysis<br />

to consider an unreliable grid. Analyses will focus on Northern<br />

Uganda using three sites where we are installing kilowatt scale<br />

solar-hybrid microgrids.<br />

W4-D.2 Nadadur, S*; NIEHS; nadadurs@niehs.nih.gov<br />

Toxicological and Health Effects Assessment ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong><br />

MWCNTs in NCNHIR Consortium<br />

The mechanical strength and excellent physicochemical<br />

properties of the carbon nanotubes (CNT) led to their<br />

widespread industrial use and application. It’s that with diverse<br />

surface and functional modifications, about 50,000 different<br />

types of carbon nanotubes can be produced. The expanded use<br />

of CNTs in flame-retardant coating <strong>for</strong> textiles and upholstery<br />

presents increased human exposure. Animal toxicological<br />

studies suggest the propensity <strong>for</strong> CNTs in the induction of<br />

frustrated phagocytosis, granulomatous inflammation and<br />

fibrosis. Hence, the toxicological assessment approaches<br />

towards providing biological plausibility and scientific bases <strong>for</strong><br />

health risk assessment should incorporate systematic high<br />

throughput in vitro screening and further in vivo validation.<br />

This presentation will detail the current research ef<strong>for</strong>ts at the<br />

NIEHS Center <strong>for</strong> Nanotechnology Health Effects Implications<br />

Research (NCNHIR) consortium ef<strong>for</strong>ts in integrating in vitro<br />

and in vivo studies on a select set of commercially produced<br />

multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) across different<br />

laboratories. These ef<strong>for</strong>ts are hoped to provide a detailed<br />

understanding on the contribution of MWCNTs purity, length,<br />

state of aggregation, and surface chemistry in biological and<br />

statistical modeling <strong>for</strong> determining hazard potential and health<br />

effects towards risk assessment. The views and opinions<br />

expressed here do not necessarily represent the opinions or<br />

conclusions of NIEHS, NIH or the US Government.<br />

T4-I.5 Naito, W*; Yasutaka, T; National Institute of Advanced<br />

Industrial Science and Technology; w-naito@aist.go.jp<br />

Cost and Effectiveness of Decontamination Options in<br />

Special Decontamination Areas in Fukushima<br />

The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost and<br />

effectiveness of decontamination options on external doses in<br />

the Special Decontamination Areas in Fukushima. Geographical<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation System (GIS) was used to relate the predicted<br />

external dose in the affected areas with the number of potential<br />

inhabitants and the land-use in the areas. The comprehensive<br />

review of the costs of different decontamination options were<br />

conducted and compiled to be used <strong>for</strong> the analyses. The results<br />

suggested that the areal decontamination in the Special<br />

Decontamination Areas in Fukushima would be effective <strong>for</strong><br />

some but not all the area to reduce air dose rate by the target<br />

level in the short period of time. In a standard option scenario,<br />

the analysis of cost and effectiveness implied that the<br />

decontamination costs <strong>for</strong> agricultural areas were estimated to<br />

account <strong>for</strong> the most part of the total decontamination costs.<br />

Within the total decontamination costs <strong>for</strong> agricultural areas,<br />

the costs of storage are estimated to account <strong>for</strong> approximately<br />

60%. In addition, the costs of decontamination per person <strong>for</strong><br />

each unit area are estimated to vary greatly. Our analysis<br />

implied that the choice of decontamination options would result<br />

in a significant decrease in the costs of decontamination and to<br />

make the most of the limited budget in the meaningful<br />

decontamination, the decontamination options should be<br />

determined according to the air dose rates and future<br />

land-use or town planning.<br />

P.134 Nakayachi, K; Doshisha University;<br />

nakayachi@mail.doshisha.ac.jp<br />

Trust in a wide variety of risk managers after a<br />

catastrophic disaster<br />

The results of an opinion survey suggest that the public’s trust<br />

in technological and scientific experts deteriorated overall after<br />

the 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan. It is not surprising that<br />

trust in risk managers responsible <strong>for</strong> nuclear technology<br />

declined after the Level 7 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi<br />

nuclear power plant. Similarly, public confidence in experts<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> disaster protection against earthquakes and<br />

tsunamis also decreased as a result of the disaster casualty of<br />

over twenty thousand. Does the public, however, distrust<br />

experts who were not directly related to predicting and<br />

responding to these disasters? The opinion survey mentioned<br />

above used the general term “scientists” and “technical<br />

experts” as the job description to be evaluated by the<br />

respondents. An expert is a specialist with competency in a<br />

particular area, however. There<strong>for</strong>e, if the public’s trust in<br />

experts had deteriorated overall, risk managers in different<br />

areas (e.g., BSE, new infectious disease, agrochemicals, etc.)<br />

would have been mistrusted more compared with the period<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the Tohoku earthquake. This research empirically<br />

examines the fluctuation in public trust of a wide variety of risk<br />

managers after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, comparing the<br />

survey data conducted be<strong>for</strong>e and after the earthquake. The<br />

results revealed that, of the fifty-one risk management systems,<br />

only two (earthquakes and nuclear power) showed decreased<br />

levels of trust. There was no significant difference in the trust<br />

score concerning the thirty hazards unrelated to earthquakes<br />

and nuclear power. Interestingly, regarding the other nineteen<br />

hazards, trust has actually increased without any evidence that<br />

the risk management has improved. The fact that public trust in<br />

risk managers unrelated to earthquakes and nuclear power has<br />

increased after the earthquake is well explained by the<br />

finite-pool-of-worry hypothesis and supported by findings of<br />

Nakayachi et al. (in press).<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!