22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

M2-F.3 Kiker, GA*; Linhoss, A; Munoz-Carpena, R; Frank, K;<br />

Fischer, R; Linkov, I; University of Florida, Mississippi State<br />

University, US Army Corps of Engineers; gkiker@ufl.edu<br />

Florida, sea level rise and decision analysis: choosing<br />

between the devil and the deep blue sea<br />

Climate change (through sea-level rise and altered weather<br />

patterns) is expected to significantly alter low-lying coastal and<br />

intertidal areas. The State of Florida has significant coastal<br />

lands that serve as an economic engine <strong>for</strong> growth as well as a<br />

refuge <strong>for</strong> ecological communities. Decisions concerning sea<br />

level rise present significant challenges at both regional and<br />

local scales <strong>for</strong> adapting to potentially adverse effects. This<br />

research ef<strong>for</strong>t presents two examples of multi-criteria decision<br />

analysis applied to coastal Florida areas at regional and local<br />

scales using the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM)<br />

to simulate potential land cover changes under a variety of<br />

scenarios. At a Florida Gulf Coast scale, we link SLAMM<br />

simulations with a habitat suitability model (Maxent) and a<br />

metapopulation model (RAMAS-GIS) to simulate decision<br />

alternatives to diminish adverse effects of sea-level rise on<br />

Snowy Plover populations. At a more local planning scale, we<br />

use SLAMM and decision analysis to explore trade-offs and risk<br />

among several sea-level rise scenarios in the Matanzas River<br />

Watershed on the northeastern Florida Atlantic coast. In each<br />

of these examples, selecting a coastal adaptation strategy<br />

under sea-level rise is a complex task that entails the<br />

consideration of multiple streams of in<strong>for</strong>mation, stakeholder<br />

preferences, value judgments, and uncertainty.<br />

P.84 Kim, S-J; Colorado State University; kim.sage@gmail.com<br />

Utilizing Need <strong>for</strong> Affect and Need <strong>for</strong> Cognition from a<br />

Dual-Processing Framework: Measuring Environmental<br />

Policy Preference by Experimental Design Studies<br />

Haddock, Maio, Arnold, and Huskinson (2008) reported that an<br />

affective message had stronger effects on attitude changes<br />

amongst those high in NFA and low in NFC. On the other hand,<br />

a cognitive message was found to elicit more positive changes<br />

in attitudes in those categorized as high in NFC and as low in<br />

NFA. Based on the review of the literature, the present study<br />

proposes several ways to more effectively utilize both NFA as<br />

well as NFC. Thus, this paper suggests H1: Individuals exposed<br />

to a cognitive message who are high in NFC and low in NFA<br />

will more likely to support an environmental policy issue (a new<br />

54.5 MPG standard by 2025), compared to individuals exposed<br />

to other messages (i.e. affective, both cognitive & affective, and<br />

neither cognitive nor affective messages); H 2: Individuals<br />

exposed to an affective message who are low in NFC and high<br />

in NFA will more likely to support an environmental policy<br />

issue, compared to individuals exposed to other messages; H 3:<br />

Individuals exposed to a combined (both cognitive and<br />

affective) message who are high in NFC and high in NFA will<br />

more likely to support an environmental policy issue, compared<br />

to individuals exposed to other messages; H 4: Individuals<br />

exposed to a neutral (neither cognitive nor affective) message<br />

who are low in NFC and low in NFA will more likely to support<br />

an environmental policy issue, compared to individuals exposed<br />

to other messages. In addition, this study adds involvement and<br />

endorser as moderators of these relationships; furthermore, it<br />

looks at opinion leadership on the climate change issue and<br />

behavior/intention towards the adoption of a new 54.5 MPG<br />

standard vehicle as additional dependent variables. A series of<br />

experimental design studies (Study 1, 2, and 3) will be<br />

introduced and their strengths/limitations will be discussed.<br />

T2-G.2 Kirby-Straker, R.*; Turner, M.; University of Maryland,<br />

College Park; George Washington University;<br />

rkirbyst@umd.edu<br />

Climate Change and Related <strong>Risk</strong>s: Personal or<br />

Impersonal?<br />

The degree to which people perceive a risk as being personal or<br />

impersonal will determine their response to the risk. This<br />

dichotomous classification of risks is related to perceived<br />

personal relevance, and an important challenge <strong>for</strong><br />

environmental risk communicators is determining how to<br />

increase personal relevance, in other words, how to make<br />

impersonal risks more personal. Be<strong>for</strong>e risk communicators<br />

address this challenge however, they must first gain a better<br />

understanding of how their audience views the risks of interest.<br />

A survey (N = 170) conducted at the University of Maryland,<br />

College Park, investigated student perceptions of eight risks:<br />

climate change, drought, flood, global warming, heat wave,<br />

high pollen count, tornado, and West Nile Virus. Participants<br />

were asked to indicate on a scale of zero to 100, their<br />

perceptions of these risks based on characteristics such as<br />

personal relevance, severity, susceptibility, immediacy, and<br />

abstractness. Demographic data, including gender, political<br />

philosophy, and home state were also collected. The data<br />

reiterated the complexity of risk perceptions and the need to<br />

unpack subjective judgments of risk be<strong>for</strong>e attempting to<br />

develop risk communication strategies to change public<br />

perceptions. The data however revealed promising results <strong>for</strong><br />

climate change and global warming, in that both were<br />

considered to be the least abstract of the eight risks and the<br />

most severe, and participants considered themselves to be most<br />

susceptible to both these risks than to the other six, despite<br />

their perceptions that these risks were the least immediate, and<br />

that they were more likely to affect people in other countries.<br />

Although these results bode well <strong>for</strong> social change regarding<br />

climate change, they suggest a disconnection between<br />

perceptions of climate change and the other risks.<br />

P.11 Kirk, M; Hakkinen, P*; Ignacio, J; Kroner, O; Maier, A;<br />

Patterson, J; University of Virginia; Kroner@TERA.org<br />

Toxidromes - A decision-making tool <strong>for</strong> early response to<br />

chemical mass exposure incidents<br />

A common language to describe and recognize clinical<br />

manifestations of toxic chemical exposures is essential <strong>for</strong><br />

emergency responders and hospital first receivers to be<br />

prepared to provide rapid and appropriate medical care <strong>for</strong><br />

victims of industrial chemical mass exposures and terrorist<br />

attacks. In these situations, when the identity of the chemical is<br />

not known, first responders need a tool to rapidly evaluate<br />

victims and identify the best course of treatment. Military and<br />

civilian emergency response communities use a “toxic<br />

syndrome” (toxidrome) approach to quickly assess victims and<br />

determine the best immediate treatment when in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

chemical exposures is limited. Toxidromes can be defined by a<br />

unique group of clinical observations, such as vital signs,<br />

mental status, pupil size, mucous membrane irritation, and lung<br />

and skin examinations. Data on over 20 toxidrome systems<br />

were evaluated to identify salient features and develop a<br />

consistent lexicon <strong>for</strong> use by state, local, tribal, territorial, and<br />

federal first responders and first receivers. A workshop of over<br />

40 practitioners and experts in emergency response,<br />

emergency medicine, and medical toxicology developed names<br />

and definitions <strong>for</strong> 12 unique toxidromes that describe and<br />

differentiate the clinical signs and symptoms from exposures to<br />

chemicals. These toxidromes focus on acute signs and<br />

symptoms caused by inhalation and dermal exposures. Each<br />

toxidrome is characterized by exposure routes and sources,<br />

organs/systems affected, initial signs and symptoms, underlying<br />

mode of action, and treatment/antidotes. Toxidrome names and<br />

definitions are designed to be readily understood and<br />

remembered by users. Communication in a crisis requires<br />

accurate and succinct terms that can quickly convey the health<br />

conditions of patients. These toxidromes lay the foundation <strong>for</strong><br />

a consistent lexicon, that if adopted widely, will improve<br />

response to chemical mass exposure incidents.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!