22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

W3-I.1 MacGillivray, BH; Cardiff University;<br />

macgillivraybh@cardiff.ac.uk<br />

Heuristics in policy relevant science: an analytical<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> characterising the strengths and limits of<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal risk and decision analysis<br />

Scholars long argued that one of the defining features of<br />

science was that it is systematic and methodical. That is,<br />

science was conceived as being governed by generally agreed<br />

upon rules <strong>for</strong> designing experiments, analysing data, and<br />

discriminating between conflicting hypotheses. Yet today this is<br />

a rather unfashionable view amongst historians and<br />

philosophers, with rules now seen as a somewhat peripheral<br />

feature of scientific practice. However, focussing on <strong>for</strong>mal risk<br />

and decision analysis, this paper argues that the obituary of<br />

rules has been prematurely written. It develops an analytical<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> studying a particular class of rules: heuristics.<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> research tends to view heuristics as lay reasoning devices<br />

that are generally sub-optimal. In contrast, we follow Pólya and<br />

Pearl in defining heuristics as rules of search, classification,<br />

inference, and choice that fall short of <strong>for</strong>mal demonstration,<br />

yet that are indispensible <strong>for</strong> domains that did not admit of<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal logic or proofs. Analysing various domains of<br />

environmental and public health governance, we identify<br />

structurally similar rules of thumb used to screen potential risk<br />

objects, to discriminate between signal and noise, to weight<br />

evidence, to select models, to extrapolate beyond datasets, and<br />

to make decisions based on agreed upon facts. We analyse the<br />

origins of these heuristics, their justifications, the functions<br />

that they play, their empirical adequacy, and the biases that<br />

they introduce. Our basic claim is that heuristics play a central<br />

role in how we collect, interpret, and act upon scientific<br />

knowledge in governing risk; that this role is not necessarily<br />

problematic; and that, above all, it needs to be taken seriously<br />

if we are concerned with robust, evidence-based public policy.<br />

T3-I.4 MacKenzie, CA; Naval Postgraduate School;<br />

camacken@nps.edu<br />

Deploying Simulation to Compare Among Different <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Reduction Strategies <strong>for</strong> Supply Chains<br />

A firm can choose among several strategies to reduce the risk<br />

of disruptions in its supply chain, including holding inventory,<br />

buying from multiple suppliers, and helping suppliers recover.<br />

Because these risk management strategies may be<br />

non-continuous and depend on each other, simulation can be<br />

used to select a near optimal combination of strategies. We<br />

develop a conceptual framework <strong>for</strong> a firm who wishes to select<br />

resilience strategies that maximize its profit. Because the risk<br />

management strategies may be dependent upon each other,<br />

finding the optimal mix of strategies becomes a difficult<br />

combinatorial problem. For example, holding inventory may<br />

maximize the profit of all the strategies examined in isolation,<br />

but a combination of helping the supplier recover and buying<br />

from an alternate supplier may result in a higher profit than<br />

just holding inventory. Simulating multiple strategies together<br />

can account <strong>for</strong> these interdependencies among the risk<br />

management strategies. This increases the number of scenarios<br />

the simulation will explore, which increases simulation time.<br />

The trade-off between increasing the number of simulations to<br />

assess the profit <strong>for</strong> a given scenario and exploring more<br />

scenarios is similar to the trade-off that occurs when using<br />

simulation to solve stochastic optimization problems.<br />

P.139 Madden, M*; Young, B; Datko-Williams, L; Wilkie, A;<br />

Dubois, JJ; Stanek, LW; Johns, D; Owens, EO; ORISE, U.S.<br />

EPA-ORD, U.S. CDC-NIOSH; madden.meagan@epa.gov<br />

Review of Health Effects and Toxicological Interactions of<br />

Air Pollutant Mixtures Containing Oxides of Nitrogen<br />

The U.S. EPA sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards<br />

(NAAQS) to protect against health effects from criteria air<br />

pollutants with the recognition that human populations are<br />

exposed to complex air pollutant mixtures. Exposure to these<br />

mixtures may differentially affect human health relative to<br />

single pollutants as a result of biological interactions between<br />

constituents of the mixture. If the effects of a mixture are equal<br />

to the sum of the effects of individual components, the effects<br />

are additive and the interaction effect is zero; additivity is often<br />

assumed as the null hypothesis <strong>for</strong> interaction effects.<br />

Alternatively, synergism (effects greater than additive) and<br />

antagonism (effects less than additive) are possible<br />

interactions, although the definitions and usage of these terms<br />

are not consistent across studies. To understand the potential<br />

biological interactions of exposure to air pollutant mixtures, we<br />

reviewed toxicological evidence (animal and controlled human<br />

exposure) from mixture studies cited in EPA’s Integrated<br />

Science Assessments (ISAs) and Air Quality Criteria Documents<br />

(AQCDs). We used quantitative and qualitative methods to<br />

determine the effects of pollutant mixtures on all health-related<br />

endpoints evaluated in these studies, specifically focusing on<br />

mixtures containing oxides of nitrogen. Many studies could not<br />

be analyzed quantitatively using our statistical model due to<br />

incomplete reporting of data. Instead, studies with incomplete<br />

response data were evaluated qualitatively <strong>for</strong> evidence of<br />

interaction effects and relevant vocabulary such as “additivity,”<br />

“synergism,” and “antagonism.” Although a number of studies<br />

reported deviations from additivity, there was no discernible<br />

pattern to the relationship between similar exposure scenarios<br />

and the direction or magnitude of the biological response. The<br />

views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do<br />

not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. EPA.<br />

P.57 Maeda, Y*; Marui, R; Yamauchi, H; Yamaki, N; Shizuoka<br />

University; tymaeda1@ipc.shizuoka.ac.jp<br />

Comparative study of risk with nursing work in Japan and<br />

China<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> with nursing work, particularly medical incidents, in<br />

hospitals in China and Japan was compared. Data about medical<br />

incidents in Japan were obtained from the survey of 1,275<br />

Japanese hospitals operated by Japan Council <strong>for</strong> Quality Health<br />

Care in 2011. As <strong>for</strong> China, a questionnaire survey was<br />

conducted from December 2012 to January 2013 among 631<br />

nurses in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. As a result, situations<br />

related to medical incidents, factors of medical incidents,<br />

length of service of nurses who found the incidents, and the<br />

season when the incidents occurred frequently were common in<br />

Japan and China, whereas frequency of medical incidents were<br />

different. In addition, satisfaction with work schedule of<br />

nursing was investigated by several questions in the survey in<br />

China. Satisfaction level with the schedule was very high in<br />

average, however dissatisfaction was also found <strong>for</strong> some<br />

questions. Independence of medical incident reporting and<br />

satisfaction with scheduling was tested. In some questions,<br />

significant relationship between dissatisfaction with schedule<br />

and frequency of medical incidents were obtained. It suggests<br />

that medical incidents are related to busyness of nursing work.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!