22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

P.25 Haber, LT*; Dourson, ML; Mohapatra, A; TERA;<br />

Haber@tera.org<br />

Development of Chemical-Specific Adjustment Factors <strong>for</strong><br />

Long-Lived Chemicals: PFOS as a Model Chemical<br />

Guidance <strong>for</strong> the development of chemical-specific adjustment<br />

factors (CSAFs) has been available <strong>for</strong> a number of years, and<br />

has been applied in assessments of several chemicals, such as<br />

boron and 2-butoxyethanol. Typical dose metrics considered <strong>for</strong><br />

interspecies extrapolation include the area under the<br />

concentration times time curve (AUC) or maximal concentration<br />

(Cmax). The IPCS (2005) guidance provides some lines of<br />

evidence to aid in choosing the dose metric, but notes that “a<br />

reasonable assumption is that effects resulting from subchronic<br />

or chronic exposure would normally be related to the AUC,<br />

especially <strong>for</strong> chemicals with long half-lives, whereas acute<br />

toxicity could be related to either the AUC or the Cmax.”<br />

Despite this guidance, CSAFs have been derived primarily <strong>for</strong><br />

chemicals with short half-lives. A challenge with using AUC <strong>for</strong><br />

interspecies extrapolation is how to take into account the<br />

duration of exposure, particularly if steady state has not been<br />

reached. We investigated the development of a CSAF <strong>for</strong><br />

long-lived chemicals, using perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) as<br />

an example. We evaluated the data supporting AUC vs. Cmax as<br />

the appropriate dose metric, with particular attention to the<br />

relationship between various dose metrics and measures of<br />

toxicity in post-exposure recovery groups. We also considered<br />

the implications of non-steady state kinetics, as well as relating<br />

the exposure duration to the critical effect.<br />

T3-F.4 Hakkinen, PJ; National Library of Medicine, National<br />

Institutes of Health; pertti.hakkinen@nih.gov<br />

Updating On-line Resources: New Tools and Approaches<br />

Being Used by NIH to Make In<strong>for</strong>mation More Accessible<br />

Human health risk assessors, risk managers, consumers, and<br />

others need to know where to look <strong>for</strong> various types of<br />

trustworthy and accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation. Much of the online<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is free and accessible around-the-clock globally.<br />

The (U.S.) National Library of Medicine (NLM) of the National<br />

Institutes of Health (NIH) compiles, reviews, and disseminates<br />

various types of human health risk assessment and<br />

management in<strong>for</strong>mation as databases, special topics Web<br />

pages, downloadable computer resources, Smartphone apps,<br />

and as Web pages optimized <strong>for</strong> mobile devices. NLM examples<br />

include numerous “Enviro-Health Links” Web pages developed<br />

to provide easy access to online content from Federal agencies<br />

and other sources on topics such as nanotechnology and indoor<br />

air. Another recent NLM example is the enhancement of the<br />

Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB®) to include new<br />

materials (e.g., nanomaterials), state-of-the science toxicology,<br />

exposure, and risk assessment in<strong>for</strong>mation, and HSDB’s first<br />

sets of images (e.g., chemical structures). Ef<strong>for</strong>ts are ongoing<br />

to examine databases developed by other organizations that<br />

could enhance the types of content in NLM’s TOXNET® suite of<br />

databases. A rather recent example is the addition in 2011 of<br />

the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). The National<br />

Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) funds the<br />

CTD. This presentation will also mention key examples of<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts by other governmental and non-governmental<br />

organizations to develop and provide free online access to risk<br />

assessment and management in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

W3-I.4 Hallegatte, S; Senior Economist, The World Bank,<br />

Sustainable Development Network, Office of the Chief<br />

Economist and World Development; shallegatte@worldbank.org<br />

Beyond the ideal – Obstacles to risk management and<br />

ways to overcome them<br />

Countless risk management measures have been shown to yield<br />

large benefits and to be highly cost-effective – yet individuals<br />

and societies often struggle to implement these measures and<br />

manage their risks effectively. The specific reasons <strong>for</strong> this vary<br />

from case to case, but are always related to the obstacles and<br />

constraints facing individuals and societies: <strong>for</strong> instance, the<br />

lack of resources and in<strong>for</strong>mation, cognitive and behavioral<br />

failures, missing markets and public goods, and social and<br />

economic externalities. This chapter analyzes and discusses<br />

these obstacles to risk management, illustrates their relevance<br />

with examples from various sectors, and presents possible<br />

solutions to overcoming them. Overall, it is argued that the<br />

identification of risks is not enough <strong>for</strong> effective risk<br />

management: the obstacles to risk management must also be<br />

identified, prioritized, and addressed through private and<br />

public action. In doing so, decision makers need to adopt a<br />

holistic approach to risk management, which coordinates<br />

across levels (from the individual to the government), and<br />

manages risks in an integrated manner.<br />

P.64 Hallman, WK*; Cuite, CL; McWilliams, RM;<br />

Senger-Mersich, A; Rutgers, The State University of New<br />

Jersey; hallman@aesop.rutgers.edu<br />

Scald and food safety risks posed by unsafe water,<br />

refrigerator, and freezer temperatures in residences of<br />

Meals On Wheels recipients in 4 US states<br />

In the US, an increasing number of older adults live alone.<br />

Taking on-site measurements in the residences of 800 Meals On<br />

Wheels Recipients in 4 US States (AR, IA, NJ and SC), this<br />

study examined the potential scald risks to older individuals<br />

posed by unsafe water temperatures and the food safety risks<br />

posed by unsafe refrigerator and freezer temperatures. Most<br />

water heater manufacturers have voluntarily adopted a 120°F<br />

standard <strong>for</strong> domestic hot water as recommended by the US<br />

Consumer Product Safety Commission. However, the thinner<br />

skin of older adults burns more quickly than that of younger<br />

people and so are at increased risk <strong>for</strong> scalding and burns even<br />

at 120°F. This study adopted a nominal acceptable water<br />

temperature range of 114.8 to 118.4°F since studies have<br />

shown that this ensures thorough removal of grease films<br />

(which may promote bacterial growth), yet reduces the risk of<br />

scalding. Only 27% had hot water temperatures within this<br />

range. More than half (52%) were >120°F and 11% were<br />

>130°F (exposure to which can result in second degree burns<br />

within seconds). The highest temperature recorded was<br />

184.5°F. Since older adults have a worse prognosis than<br />

younger patients after scald burns, the potential health<br />

consequences are serious <strong>for</strong> a large percentage of this<br />

population. The USDA recommends a freezer temperature <<br />

0°F and a refrigerator temperature < 40°F to minimize<br />

microbial growth. However, 71.6% of the homes surveyed had<br />

freezer temperatures >0°F; with homes in AR and SC at<br />

statistically significantly higher risk of out-of-range freezers. In<br />

addition, 26.3% had refrigerator temperatures > 40°F; with<br />

homes in AR at statistically significantly higher risk of having<br />

an out-of-range refrigerator. The results suggest that the risks<br />

of scalding and microbial exposure are high <strong>for</strong> a large number<br />

of older individuals and highlights the need <strong>for</strong> surveillance and<br />

the development of prevention strategies to ensure safer water,<br />

refrigerator and freezer temperatures in the homes of these<br />

individuals.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!