22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

T4-G.3 Kuttschreuter, M.*; Hilverda, M.D.; Pieniak, Z.;<br />

Department Psychology of Conflict, <strong>Risk</strong> and Safety, University<br />

of Twente; margot.kuttschreuter@utwente.nl<br />

Actively seeking versus taking notice of risk in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />

the case of food risks<br />

Food safety incidents in the Western world still take lives.<br />

Examples are the contamination of cantaloupes with Listeria in<br />

the US and that of fenugreek seeds with the EHEC-bacterium in<br />

Europe. Such incidents typically lead to anxiety among<br />

consumers, a need <strong>for</strong> additional in<strong>for</strong>mation and potentially<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking behaviour. How these processes function<br />

precisely, is yet unknown. This presentation focuses on the<br />

applicability of the <strong>Risk</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation Seeking and Processing<br />

(RISP) model to food risks, and on the channels that consumers<br />

use to find relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation. Building on prior research, the<br />

RISP-model was refined and a distinction was made between<br />

two modes of in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking: taking notice of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

that one encounters accidentally versus actively taking steps to<br />

search and find additional in<strong>for</strong>mation. Data were gathered<br />

through a cross-sectional survey that was carried out in 8<br />

different European countries as part of the FoodRisC-project<br />

(n= 6400). This survey focused on the responses to the risks of<br />

fresh vegetables. Participants were questioned regarding their<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking behaviour and a number of potential<br />

determinants such as risk perception and trust in the safety of<br />

food products. Their use of in<strong>for</strong>mation channels such as<br />

traditional mass media, internet resources and social media<br />

was also measured. Television and search engines as Google<br />

were found to be the channels most often used to learn more<br />

about the risks involved. Taking notice of risk in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

actively taking steps to learn more were indeed distinct <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

of in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking behaviour (r = .61). Regression analysis<br />

showed that there were differences as well as similarities in the<br />

determinants of both modes of in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking. Structural<br />

equation modelling has been applied to test a model, describing<br />

the determinants of both modes of in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking, using<br />

AMOS. Results will be presented and the consequences <strong>for</strong> risk<br />

communication will be discussed.<br />

W4-F.1 Kuzma, J; NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY;<br />

jenniferkuzma0@gmail.com<br />

Global <strong>Risk</strong> Governance <strong>for</strong> Genome Editing<br />

Recently the field of biotechnology has been revolutionized with<br />

the introduction of promising new technologies, which can be<br />

collectively called “targeted genetic modification techniques”<br />

(TagMo). Unlike traditional genetic engineering technologies,<br />

which introduced changes in genomes randomly, these new<br />

methods allow scientists to modify DNA sequences at precise<br />

locations. These new technologies are revolutionizing<br />

biotechnology by making the engineering process <strong>for</strong> plants,<br />

animals, mammals, and bacteria faster and allowing multiple<br />

site-directed modifications to organisms in a short period of<br />

time. These TagMo methods have collectively been referred to<br />

as “genome-scale engineering”, “genome editing,” or “genomic<br />

rewriting.” They represent a transition between old<br />

recombinant DNA (rDNA) genetic engineering and synthetic<br />

biology. In turn, they present significant governance<br />

challenges, including ambiguity in what the potential risk<br />

analysis issues are and whether existing regulatory definitions<br />

and systems can accommodate the rapid changes in these<br />

technologies. In this paper, first the landscape of the genome<br />

editing field will be explored by using "tech mining" techniques<br />

based on bibliometric analysis of a key set of articles from the<br />

Web of Science. This analysis will help to lay the groundwork<br />

<strong>for</strong> discussions of particular sub-fields of TagMo and associated<br />

risk assessment issues including gene flow, gene stability &<br />

migration, and their off-target impacts. A subset of the<br />

literature on the stability and specificity of genomic insertions,<br />

deletions, or edits using TagMo will be reviewed. Then, select<br />

models <strong>for</strong> risk analysis of the first generation of products of<br />

genetic modification will be evaluated <strong>for</strong> their appropriateness<br />

<strong>for</strong> emerging products of TagMo based on findings from an<br />

expert-stakeholder interview process, workshop, and existing<br />

literature. Finally, the state of risk governance <strong>for</strong> genome<br />

editing in three key regions of development—the U.S., EU, and<br />

Japan—will be examined in a comparative policy analysis<br />

approach.<br />

T1-A.8 Lachlan, KA*; Spence, PR; Lin, X; University of<br />

Massachusetts Boston (Lachlan), University of Kentucky<br />

(Spence & Lin); ken.lachlan@umb.edu<br />

Getting In<strong>for</strong>mation to Underserved Communities using<br />

Twitter: Lessons from Hurricane Sandy<br />

With its capability <strong>for</strong> real time updating and reports from the<br />

scenes of accidents and disasters, Twitter has emerged as a<br />

medium that may be especially useful <strong>for</strong> emergency managers<br />

communicating the risks associated with impending events. Yet,<br />

little is known about the ways in which Twitter is being utilized<br />

during widespread disasters, or the ways in which government<br />

agencies are using Twitter in reaching at risk populations.<br />

Given past research suggesting that members of underserved<br />

communities may be especially at risk during crisis and natural<br />

disasters, this is especially problematic. The current study<br />

involves an automated content analysis of over 20,000 tweets<br />

collected in the days leading up to the landfall of Hurricane<br />

Sandy, and a human coder subsample of 1785 tweets that were<br />

evaluated in greater depth. Tweets containing the hashtag<br />

#sandy were examined, since this was the official hashtag used<br />

by the National Weather Service in their communication ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />

Tweets were collected in four hour intervals over the course of<br />

four days. The results indicate that in the days leading up to<br />

landfall, risk in<strong>for</strong>mation became less prevalent and<br />

expressions of negative affect became more common. Tweets<br />

from relief agencies and emergency managers were all but<br />

absent in the sea of in<strong>for</strong>mation. Tweets in languages other<br />

than English were largely absent during the developing stages<br />

of the crisis, and very few of these contained actionable<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation. The results are discussed in terms of best<br />

practices <strong>for</strong> emergency managers in conveying risk<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation to historically underserved communities.<br />

T1-D.3 Lambertini, E*; Buchanan, RL; Narrod, C; Pradhan, AK;<br />

University of Maryland, Joint Institute <strong>for</strong> Food Safety and<br />

Applied Nutrition; elilam@umd.edu<br />

Zoonotic diseases from companion animals: risk of<br />

salmonellosis associated with pet food<br />

Recent Salmonella outbreaks associated with dry pet food<br />

highlight the importance of these foods as vehicles <strong>for</strong> zoonotic<br />

pathogens. The need to characterize the risk pro<strong>file</strong> of this class<br />

of products is currently not supported by data. Moreover, the<br />

relative impact of industry practices and household behavior in<br />

mitigating risk is unknown. This study aims to: 1) model the<br />

microbial ecology of Salmonella in the dry pet food production<br />

chain, 2) estimate pet and human exposure to Salmonella<br />

through pet food, and 3) assess the impact of mitigation<br />

strategies on human illness risk. Data on Salmonella<br />

contamination levels in pet food ingredients, production<br />

parameters, bacterial ecology on food and surfaces, and<br />

transfer by contact were obtained through a systematic<br />

literature review and from industry data. A probabilistic<br />

quantitative microbial risk assessment model was developed to<br />

estimate exposure of pets and their owners to Salmonella in pet<br />

food, and the associated illness risk. Model outcomes highlight<br />

that human illness risk due to handling pet food is minimal if<br />

contamination occurs be<strong>for</strong>e the heated extrusion step (10-15<br />

CFU/Kg of food at the point of exposure, even with initial 1015<br />

CFU/Kg in the protein meal ingredient). <strong>Risk</strong> increases<br />

significantly if contamination occurs in coating fat, with mean<br />

probability of illness per exposure Pill 1/1000 at mean<br />

Salmonella levels of 107 CFU/Kg fat. In this case, an additional<br />

post-coating 3-Log CFU reduction is needed to limit Pill to 10-6<br />

(mean of 0.03 CFU/Kg in finished product). Recontamination<br />

after extrusion and coating, e.g. via dust or condensate, can<br />

lead to even higher risk (Pill 1/100 with mean Salmonella levels<br />

of 0.4 CFU/Kg in intermediate product). In this scenario, hand<br />

washing after handling food would reduce the Pill only by 30%.<br />

The developed risk model provides a tool to estimate health<br />

impacts under a range of production and household handling<br />

scenarios. Model results provide a basis <strong>for</strong> improvements in<br />

production processes, risk communication to consumers, and<br />

regulatory action.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!