22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

T3-B.4 Menzie, C; Kashuba, R*; Exponent;<br />

rkashuba@exponent.com<br />

Developing Effect-Based Conceptual Models <strong>for</strong><br />

Cumulative <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment (CRA) that can<br />

Accommodate Diverse Stressors<br />

In contrast to stressor-driven risk assessment, which focuses on<br />

identifying the potential effects of a particular stressor,<br />

effects-driven risk assessment aims to characterize the various<br />

interacting stressors and pathways that can lead to an effect of<br />

concern. This causal web of influences can be mapped using a<br />

conceptual model framework of nodes and arrows, representing<br />

concepts and relationships. In identifying assessment<br />

endpoints, stressors, and the connections among them, a<br />

conceptual model helps stakeholders visualize the problem<br />

context, facilitating communication and understanding of the<br />

contributing causes to an adverse condition. The evaluation of<br />

risk factors leading to cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a<br />

particularly good example of a complex system of mechanisms<br />

resulting in an undesired health effect. Literature review<br />

identifies upward of 50 different factors whose influence on<br />

CVD has been studied or postulated, including biological<br />

considerations such as lipid status and genetics, behaviors such<br />

as smoking and shift work, environmental exposures such as<br />

mercury and arsenic, and socioeconomic correlations.<br />

Conceptual model development involves (1) defining the model<br />

endpoint (e.g., CVD as physiological changes affecting heart<br />

function, excluding congenital heart defects), (2) identifying<br />

proximal biological mechanisms that lead to that endpoint (e.g.,<br />

tissue injury, inflammation, atherosclerosis), (3) sorting and<br />

summarizing risk factors and categorizing direct versus indirect<br />

pathways of influence, (4) soliciting feedback from<br />

subject-matter experts as part of the iterative model-amending<br />

process, and (5) ensuring aesthetics that most clearly<br />

communicate the modeled system (e.g., color-coding stressor<br />

categories). A conceptual model diagram can then be used as a<br />

starting point to evaluate the magnitude and certainty of<br />

(in<strong>for</strong>mation available <strong>for</strong>) each causal pathway, and to<br />

prioritize both potential interventions and future research<br />

directions.<br />

W4-C.5 Merad Myriam, *; Marcel Frédéric, ; INERIS;<br />

myriam.merad@ineris.fr<br />

Is it possible to assess the quality of the governance?<br />

Conclusions of the National working group on<br />

Governance of sustainability within public organizations<br />

Economical constraints on organizations can threaten their<br />

sustainability. Past and present disasters and scandals such as<br />

<strong>for</strong> example BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster in the Gulf of<br />

Mexico in 2010, Servier Mediator (Benfluorex) scandal in 2009<br />

and Enron affair and collapse in 2001 have pointed significant<br />

weakness in governance issues. By governance, we mean more<br />

than corporate governance aspects. In addition to the rules of<br />

functioning of the Board of Directors, aspects such as<br />

functioning of the organization, risk management policy and<br />

how risk are prevented, relationship with stakeholders,<br />

communication and reporting on Corporate Social<br />

Responsibility and Sustainable Development and the way<br />

missions and projects of the organization are conducted must<br />

be considered. INERIS is a member of public institutions and<br />

companies’ Sustainable Development (SD) Club and<br />

contributes, in this framework, to animate and to coordinate a<br />

working group on "the governance of public organizations in<br />

response to SD the challenges". We have argued that there is a<br />

need to develop methods and tools to diagnosis and assess the<br />

governance of the organizations with respect to Sustainable<br />

Development. However, this task remains difficult due to the<br />

fact that it is complicated to appraisal the quality of<br />

governance. This paper will present the conclusion of a 3 years<br />

national working group on governance of public organizations<br />

in response to Sustainable development challenges and will<br />

present a protocol to diagnosis and analyzes the governance of<br />

SD based in the use of multiple-criteria decision aiding<br />

methods.<br />

P.61 Merad Myriam, *; Marcel Frédéric, ; INERIS;<br />

myriam.merad@ineris.fr<br />

A pragmatic way of achieving High Sustainable<br />

Organization: Governance and organizational learning in<br />

action in the public French sector<br />

Sustainability is becoming more and more the key challenge <strong>for</strong><br />

organizations. The French public organizations are currently<br />

working on issues related to both the assessments and the<br />

governance of sustainability. In this paper we propose a<br />

“proactive-based assessment” that help to set clear and<br />

conscious the different stage of progress of the organizations in<br />

terms of sustainability and responsiveness in that respect.<br />

Three new concepts to deal with the problem of sustainability<br />

<strong>for</strong> a public organization are proposed based on a<br />

research-in-action approach: the concept of “critical capital”,<br />

the concept of High Sustainable Organization (HSO), and the<br />

concept of learning stages within HSO. Our contribution is<br />

mainly based on investigation and pragmatic observation done<br />

within the French working group on “Governance” of public<br />

organizations.<br />

T3-H.4 Meyer, AK*; Groher, DM; Cain, LG; AM: Environmental<br />

and Munitions Center of Expertise, Army Corps of Engineers;<br />

DG and LC: New England District, Army Corps of Engineers;<br />

anita.k.meyer@usace.army.mil<br />

Health <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment/<strong>Risk</strong> Management Case Study:<br />

Managing Project Uncertainty Presented by the IRIS<br />

Trichloroethylene Reference Concentration Published in<br />

IRIS<br />

In the fall of 2011 the IRIS Toxicological Review of<br />

Trichloroethylene (TCE) was finalized and published. However,<br />

questions still remain regarding use of the chronic reference<br />

concentration (RfC) whose basis includes developmental effects<br />

with a exposure window of concern less than thirty days as a<br />

critical endpoint. Implementing this value to assess risk leads<br />

to issues over sampling and analysis, exposure assessment and<br />

risk management, due to the subacute concern within the<br />

chronic toxicity value. This presentation will describe<br />

Department of Defense research ef<strong>for</strong>ts and practical site<br />

approaches that may be used to address these issues.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!