22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

P.49 Yuyama, A*; Kajitani, Y; Central Research Institute of<br />

Electric Power Industry; yuyama@criepi.denken.or.jp<br />

Recovery estimation model of thermal power plants<br />

damaged by complex hazards -Case of the 2011<br />

Tohoku-oki Earthquake<br />

The 2011 Tohoku-oki Earthquake and the resulting nuclear<br />

accidents at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant has caused<br />

power shortages in Japan. 18 thermal power plants (39 units)<br />

located in Kanto and Tohoku region were affected by<br />

earthquake and tsunami and, as a result, about 30% of thermal<br />

power generation capacity in East Japan was lost. This was the<br />

most severe accident in thermal power plants in Japan and<br />

became one of the main causes of the power crisis. In order to<br />

secure stable power supply, restoration of the damaged plants<br />

was carried out immediately after the disaster as well as other<br />

remedial measures such as installation of emergency power<br />

sources. All affected plants except one scrapped unit have<br />

resumed operation by April 2013. Clarifying damage and<br />

recovery mechanism of thermal power plants due to such large<br />

scale, complex hazards is necessary <strong>for</strong> the analysis of power<br />

shortage risk <strong>for</strong> future disasters. Thus, we examine the<br />

relationships between recovery duration and various factors<br />

such as observed seismic ground motion, tsunami height,<br />

failure mode, and restoration policy. In addition to these<br />

internal factors, it is shown that the damage situation of<br />

infrastructure that plants depend on such as the disruption of<br />

industrial water supply could delay the restoration.<br />

M4-G.5 Zacharias, CA*; Bronfman, NC; Cifuentes, LA; Jimenez,<br />

RB; Pontificia Universidad Catolica De Chile; cazachar@uc.cl<br />

A longitudinal study of risk perception: The case of Chile<br />

Chile has experienced several social and cultural changes<br />

during the last 15 years. Per-capita income growth and political<br />

stability have placed Chile in a leading position, becoming the<br />

first South American country to join the OECD in 2010.<br />

Development has produced many changes in society. Social ills<br />

are a now primary concern, leading to laws controlling abuse of<br />

alcohol and drugs, and to ef<strong>for</strong>ts to reduce inequality in health<br />

and educational services. Environmental concerns have<br />

switched somehow from local and regional problems, such as<br />

particulate air pollution and wastewater pollution to global<br />

issues, such as climate change. Also, natural disasters have<br />

affected the population. In 2010, Chile suffered an 8.9<br />

magnitude earthquake and tsunami, something not experienced<br />

by the Chilean population since 1960. With all these changes, it<br />

is expected that public risk perception might have changed. The<br />

main objective of this investigation is to assess the change in<br />

risk perception in the last decade. To achieve this, we<br />

characterized current public concerns and perceptions of risk,<br />

and contrasted them with those quantified and reported a<br />

decade ago by the study of Bronfman and Cifuentes (2003).<br />

Based on the psychometric paradigm, and using a similar<br />

survey to the one implemented be<strong>for</strong>e, we studied the<br />

differences in perceptions of risk, benefit and acceptability <strong>for</strong><br />

40 activities, substances or technologies. Differences in risk<br />

perceptions regarding natural hazards, environmental hazards<br />

and social ills were studied and analyzed. Additionally,<br />

geographical and socio-economical differences were explored,<br />

and differences between laypeople and experts’ risk<br />

perceptions where also investigated.<br />

P.85 Zacharias, C.A.; Jimenez, R.B.*; Bronfman, N.C.;<br />

Universidad Andres Bello; rjimenez@unab.cl<br />

Improving natural disaster risk communication<br />

strategies: Characterizing public trust in institutions<br />

involved in natural disaster management in Chile<br />

In recent years, natural disasters in Chile have tested the<br />

response capacity of local authorities, revealing significant<br />

weaknesses in the way that the these risks are currently<br />

assessed, managed and communicated to the public. Several<br />

studies suggest that public trust in institutions in charge of<br />

managing complex risks such as natural disasters, has a<br />

significant influence on public attitudes towards decisions and<br />

initiatives that emerge from such institutions. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

development of effective natural disaster communication<br />

strategies must address public concerns, preferences and levels<br />

of public trust in relevant actors in disaster prevention, warning<br />

and response. So far, the extent to which Chilean trust local<br />

institutions in charge of communicating and in<strong>for</strong>ming the<br />

community about natural disaster risks remains unknown. To<br />

fill this void, this study aimed at characterizing the degree of<br />

public trust in institutions responsible <strong>for</strong> risk communication<br />

and education of natural hazards in Chile. Chileans’ trust in ten<br />

institutions with relevant roles in natural disaster risk<br />

communication in Chile (government, scientific community,<br />

NGOs and others) will be characterized using a survey. For<br />

each institution, participants will rate a set of six observable<br />

variables that account <strong>for</strong> two dimension of institutional trust<br />

(competence-based trust and integrity-based trust) using a<br />

5-point Likert scale. The survey will be implemented in July<br />

2013. To better represent Chilean population, this survey will<br />

be administered in four major Chilean cities: Iquique, Santiago,<br />

Valparaiso and Concepcion. Data from the survey will be<br />

analyzed using descriptive statistics and confirmatory factor<br />

analysis. Results from the present study will provide a useful<br />

tool <strong>for</strong> decision makers in natural disaster risk management,<br />

especially <strong>for</strong> relevant actors and governmental agencies in<br />

charge of developing and implementing risk communication,<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation and education strategies.<br />

T3-E.2 Zaleski, R*; Gaborek, BJ; Qian, H; Bellin, CA; Dellarco,<br />

M; Egeghy, P; Heard, N; Jolliet, O; Lander, DR; Tanir, JY;<br />

ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc.;<br />

rosemary.t.zaleski@exxonmobil.com<br />

Exposure Bands <strong>for</strong> Tiered Exposure Assessment<br />

Decision-Making<br />

A goal of the ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences<br />

Institute’s RISK21 project is to move risk assessment <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

into the 21st Century, including maximizing and extending use<br />

of available data and tools. One objective is to assess if<br />

available exposure data and tools can be utilized in a<br />

“high-throughput” methodology analogous to advancements in<br />

toxicological sciences. To meet this goal, RISK21 has explored<br />

the applicability of exposure banding using existing exposure<br />

tools and data as an early tier in the overall RISK21 approach.<br />

Exposure banding in this context refers to the grouping of<br />

substances based on attributes such as physicochemical<br />

properties and activities/uses and predicting corresponding<br />

exposure concentrations associated with these attributes.<br />

Available exposure models and approaches were evaluated and<br />

several were identified that could readily be used to develop<br />

exposure bands: the European Centre <strong>for</strong> Ecotoxicology and<br />

Toxicology of Chemicals Targeted <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment (ECETOC<br />

–TRA) tool (worker and consumer); European Solvent Industry<br />

Group’s Generic Exposure Scenario <strong>Risk</strong> and Exposure Tool<br />

(EGRET) (consumer); and the European Union System <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Evaluation of Substances (EUSES)-based approach of Verdonck<br />

et al. (environmental). Look-up tables of exposure and/or risk<br />

bands were developed based upon these tools and evaluated <strong>for</strong><br />

utility within the RISK21 tiered exposure framework. Strengths,<br />

limitations and areas <strong>for</strong> future refinement that could advance<br />

this type of approach will also be discussed. This abstract does<br />

not necessarily reflect U.S. EPA policy.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!