Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />
W4-J.3 Cox, T; Cox Associates and University of Colorado;<br />
TCoxDenver@aol.com<br />
Have Historical Reductions in Ozone and Fine Particulate<br />
Matter Caused Reductions in Mortality Rates?<br />
Between 1999 and 2010, levels of air pollutants in counties in<br />
Texas changed significantly, with fine particulate matter<br />
(PM2.5) and coarser particulate matter (PM10) declining by<br />
over 25% in some counties, and ozone exhibiting large<br />
variations from year to year. This history provides an<br />
opportunity to compare changes in average ambient pollutant<br />
levels from year to year in different counties to corresponding<br />
changes in all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality<br />
rates. We test the hypothesis that changes in historical<br />
pollution levels caused or help to predict changes in mortality<br />
rates. The hypothesis of a significant linear relation between<br />
changes in pollutant concentrations from year to year and<br />
corresponding changes in all-cause, cardiovascular, or<br />
respiratory disease risks is not supported by the historical data<br />
from Texas counties. Nonparametric tests (Spearman’s rank<br />
correlations) also show no significant ordinal associations<br />
between yearly changes in pollutant levels and corresponding<br />
changes in disease mortality rates. These findings suggest that<br />
predicted substantial short-term human benefits of incremental<br />
life-saving from reducing PM2.5 and ozone, predicted by the<br />
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and<br />
others based on statistical models of exposure-response<br />
associations elsewhere, may not hold in Texas counties. This<br />
possibility emphasizes both the potential <strong>for</strong> heterogeneity in<br />
air pollution health effects across regions, and also the high<br />
potential value of in<strong>for</strong>mation from accountability research that<br />
compares model-based predictions of health benefits from<br />
reducing air pollutants to historical records of what has actually<br />
occurred.<br />
T1-A.3 Cuite, CL*; Hallman, WK; Rutgers, The State<br />
University; cuite@aesop.rutgers.edu<br />
Social Media and Food Crisis Communication<br />
This study explores how to use social media to effectively<br />
communicate with the public about food risks. Using an<br />
Internet-based survey with a national sample of 1904 adults, we<br />
tested how the <strong>for</strong>mat of a URL affects how people respond to a<br />
message and the effectiveness of different sources of a social<br />
media message. We randomly assigned participants to see one<br />
of four “tiny” URLs at the end of a social-media style message<br />
(in which no source was identified) concerning a food<br />
contamination event. The URLs are from actual government<br />
tweets, two with usa.gov (go.usa.gov/YXNC and<br />
1.usa.gov/RvvLKI) and two with random text (is.gd/FfQIDl and<br />
ow.ly/emXG7). The two URLS with “usa.gov” were significantly<br />
more likely to be perceived as being from the government (F (3,<br />
1167) 20.78, p