22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

W4-J.3 Cox, T; Cox Associates and University of Colorado;<br />

TCoxDenver@aol.com<br />

Have Historical Reductions in Ozone and Fine Particulate<br />

Matter Caused Reductions in Mortality Rates?<br />

Between 1999 and 2010, levels of air pollutants in counties in<br />

Texas changed significantly, with fine particulate matter<br />

(PM2.5) and coarser particulate matter (PM10) declining by<br />

over 25% in some counties, and ozone exhibiting large<br />

variations from year to year. This history provides an<br />

opportunity to compare changes in average ambient pollutant<br />

levels from year to year in different counties to corresponding<br />

changes in all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality<br />

rates. We test the hypothesis that changes in historical<br />

pollution levels caused or help to predict changes in mortality<br />

rates. The hypothesis of a significant linear relation between<br />

changes in pollutant concentrations from year to year and<br />

corresponding changes in all-cause, cardiovascular, or<br />

respiratory disease risks is not supported by the historical data<br />

from Texas counties. Nonparametric tests (Spearman’s rank<br />

correlations) also show no significant ordinal associations<br />

between yearly changes in pollutant levels and corresponding<br />

changes in disease mortality rates. These findings suggest that<br />

predicted substantial short-term human benefits of incremental<br />

life-saving from reducing PM2.5 and ozone, predicted by the<br />

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and<br />

others based on statistical models of exposure-response<br />

associations elsewhere, may not hold in Texas counties. This<br />

possibility emphasizes both the potential <strong>for</strong> heterogeneity in<br />

air pollution health effects across regions, and also the high<br />

potential value of in<strong>for</strong>mation from accountability research that<br />

compares model-based predictions of health benefits from<br />

reducing air pollutants to historical records of what has actually<br />

occurred.<br />

T1-A.3 Cuite, CL*; Hallman, WK; Rutgers, The State<br />

University; cuite@aesop.rutgers.edu<br />

Social Media and Food Crisis Communication<br />

This study explores how to use social media to effectively<br />

communicate with the public about food risks. Using an<br />

Internet-based survey with a national sample of 1904 adults, we<br />

tested how the <strong>for</strong>mat of a URL affects how people respond to a<br />

message and the effectiveness of different sources of a social<br />

media message. We randomly assigned participants to see one<br />

of four “tiny” URLs at the end of a social-media style message<br />

(in which no source was identified) concerning a food<br />

contamination event. The URLs are from actual government<br />

tweets, two with usa.gov (go.usa.gov/YXNC and<br />

1.usa.gov/RvvLKI) and two with random text (is.gd/FfQIDl and<br />

ow.ly/emXG7). The two URLS with “usa.gov” were significantly<br />

more likely to be perceived as being from the government (F (3,<br />

1167) 20.78, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!