22.04.2014 Views

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

Abstracts (PDF file, 1.8MB) - Society for Risk Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRA 2013 Annual Meeting <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

P.44 Oka, T; Fukui Prefectural University; oka@fpu.ac.jp<br />

Cost-effectiveness of the decontamination activities in<br />

the evacuation zones due to the Fukushima nuclear<br />

accident<br />

Under the Act on Special Measures Concerning the Handling of<br />

Radioactive Pollution, the areas contaminated with radioactive<br />

materials due to the accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear<br />

Power Station are broken down into two categories: i) Special<br />

Decontamination Area, which consists of the areas located in<br />

20km radius from Fukushima Daiich Power Station and of the<br />

areas where annual cumulative dose could be more than<br />

20mSv, and ii) Intensive Contamination Survey Area, in which<br />

over 1mSv/y of additional exposure dose were observed. We<br />

have estimated costs and effectiveness of the decontamination<br />

works being implemented in the Special Decontamination Area,<br />

by specifying the decontamination method <strong>for</strong> houses and<br />

buildings, agricultural lands, <strong>for</strong>ests, and roads, by assuming<br />

efficiencies of the methods, and on the basis of the data on<br />

land-use in each 1km mesh. Effects of decontamination appear<br />

as reductions in air dose rate, from which reductions in<br />

cumulative dose in a year are calculated assuming a value <strong>for</strong><br />

occupancy/shielding factor. Taking into account the return ratio<br />

of the evacuated people as a function of cumulative dose in a<br />

year, which has been estimated from questionnaire surveys of<br />

the municipalities in the affected area, the effects of<br />

decontamination are represented by reductions in the<br />

cumulative dose taking the return ratio into account, which are<br />

measured by the integral from the dose after decontamination<br />

to the dose be<strong>for</strong>e it of the return ratio with respect to the dose.<br />

These values are converted into reductions in the loss of<br />

life-expectancy due to the exposure in the next 30 years, which<br />

produce, when combined with the costs of decontamination,<br />

values <strong>for</strong> cost per life-year saved. The result <strong>for</strong> the cost per<br />

life-year saved is 5 billion yen on the average over the total area<br />

(ranging from 10^8 to 10^12 yen) when the<br />

occupancy/shielding factor is 0.6. The relation of the<br />

cost-effectiveness to the level of contamination depends on the<br />

value <strong>for</strong> the occupancy/shielding factor.<br />

P.97 Okada, T*; Inaba, T; Hitotsubashi University;<br />

sd121003@g.hit-u.ac.jp<br />

Exploring the impact of negative emotions on in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

seeking about radioactive food contamination in Japan<br />

after March 11, 2011<br />

Although previous research shows that negative emotions can<br />

increase in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking, few have examined the<br />

qualitative outcomes of this behavior. The nature of these<br />

outcomes is crucial, <strong>for</strong> if people receive biased in<strong>for</strong>mation or<br />

if acquire incorrect knowledge, the unin<strong>for</strong>med may suffer.<br />

Thus, we explore the extent, viewpoints (negative or positive) of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation sought, and the knowledge gleaned by anxiety- and<br />

anger-induced in<strong>for</strong>mation search on measures of radioactive<br />

food contamination. After the March,2011 nuclear power plant<br />

accident in Japan,the government has monitored the<br />

radioactivity of foods produced in affected areas and bans<br />

shipments if levels exceed scientifically established legal limits.<br />

But widespread skepticism remains as to whether food within<br />

those limits is truly safe. Survey data (N=800) provided the<br />

following results. First, anxious people were more likely to seek<br />

news from many sources. Next, anxiety increased exposure to<br />

negative views about legal standards <strong>for</strong> food radioactivity,<br />

while anger led to more exposure to positive views, no<br />

significant effect of emotions was found on knowledge of food<br />

safety. Although anxiety was positively related to knowledge of<br />

the impact of low-dose radiation on health<br />

(government-provided in<strong>for</strong>mation frequently reported shortly<br />

after the accident), no relationship was found between<br />

emotions and knowledge of rationales <strong>for</strong> changed legal<br />

standards or their implementation. Finally, the model was not<br />

significant in predicting whether or not one’s understanding of<br />

the changing legal standards was accurate. These results imply<br />

that each emotion influences the quality of in<strong>for</strong>mation seeking<br />

differently, and that irrespective of the number of news sources<br />

sought, they tend to be biased toward negative views. Further,<br />

while anxiety may direct attention to news about potential<br />

harm, the timing and characteristics of the reported news may<br />

be critical to the economic consequences of that in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

seeking.<br />

T4-E.4 Okelo, PO*; Hooberman, B; Graber, G; Bartholomew,<br />

MJ; Stewart, KN; FDA Center <strong>for</strong> Veterinary Medicine; FDA<br />

Office of Foods and Veterinary Medicine; AFSS Consulting;<br />

FDA Center <strong>for</strong> Veterinary Medicine; FDA Center <strong>for</strong> Veterinary<br />

Medicine; mary.bartholomew@fda.hhs.gov<br />

<strong>Risk</strong>-Ranking Model <strong>for</strong> Hazards in Animal Feed<br />

The FDA Center <strong>for</strong> Veterinary Medicine is developing a<br />

semi-quantitative model that ranks health risks to animals and<br />

humans associated with animal feed hazards. Explanatory<br />

variables to represent two components of the risk model namely<br />

health consequence and exposure components were selected as<br />

follows. <strong>Risk</strong> Score = Health Consequence Score (HCS) x<br />

Exposure Score (ES), where: HCS = Severity of Illness Score<br />

(SIS) x Likelihood of Illness Score (LIS). The variables were<br />

then characterized and rated as follows. Severity of illness<br />

variables: 1) organ system (e.g., renal, respiratory,<br />

cardiovascular), 2) signs and symptoms severity (e.g. low,<br />

moderate, high), and 3) signs and symptoms duration (e.g., < 1<br />

day, 2-5 days, > 5 days). Likelihood of illness variables: 1) safe<br />

exposure level (e.g., high, moderate, low), and 2) agent stability<br />

(e.g., low, moderate, high). Exposure variables: 1)<br />

contamination rate (e.g., low, moderate, high), 2)<br />

manufacturing effect (e.g., high, moderate, low, no effect), 3)<br />

post processing control (e.g., in control, out-of-control),<br />

proportion of animals consuming feed (e.g., small, medium,<br />

large), and 4) feed consumption frequency (e.g., once a day, 3<br />

times a day, ad libitum). The model was implemented on a<br />

user-friendly Excel spreadsheet plat<strong>for</strong>m that prompts the user<br />

to select from a list of qualitative statements and/or to provide<br />

quantitative data concerning the identified explanatory<br />

variables with respect to a specific species-feed-hazard<br />

combination. An algorithm written into the spreadsheet<br />

converts the qualitative inputs into numerical values, which are<br />

combined with the quantitative inputs in a series of logical<br />

steps using standard mathematical spreadsheet functions. The<br />

results are used to generate indices of animal and human<br />

health risk. We will walk through the model to develop a risk<br />

score <strong>for</strong> one animal feed hazard.<br />

T4-F.3 Okwesili, P*; Mazzuchi, T; Sarkani, S; George<br />

Washington University; okwesp@gwu.edu<br />

A <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment <strong>for</strong> an In<strong>for</strong>med Decision-making <strong>for</strong><br />

Non-traditional Pharmacy Compounding<br />

The recent multi-state outbreak of fungal meningitis, and other<br />

infections, has killed 53 people and sickened over 733 people<br />

across 20 states to date. The multi-state outbreak linked to the<br />

non-traditional compounding pharmacy in Framingham,<br />

Massachusetts, demonstrates the need <strong>for</strong> more rigorous<br />

regulatory oversight of compounding pharmacies. This most<br />

recent outbreak is one of over 240 incidents reported to FDA<br />

associated with improperly compounded products over the last<br />

two decades. The regulation of pharmacy compounding has<br />

proven challenging because non-traditional compounders act<br />

more like pharmaceutical manufacturers, than traditional<br />

compounding pharmacies. Some of these pharmacies prepare<br />

medicines in large volume production and ship across state<br />

lines while claiming the protections of traditional compounding<br />

pharmacies, which are subject to state regulations, and not<br />

directly regulated by federal oversight. In her congressional<br />

testimony in November 2012, FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret<br />

Hamburg proposed a three-tiered policy framework <strong>for</strong> a<br />

risk-based regulatory system that will make non-traditional<br />

compounding subject to federal safety and quality standards.<br />

Those tiers are 1) Manufacturers, 2) Traditional Pharmacy<br />

Compounders, and 3) Non-traditional Pharmacy Compounders.<br />

To address the challenge associated with the policy-making <strong>for</strong><br />

the non-traditional pharmacy compounding tier, the authors<br />

identify the critical risk factors of non-traditional pharmacy<br />

compounding, assess their degree of influence of these risk<br />

factors on the likelihood of experiencing an adverse event, and<br />

analyze their impact on public health. This is accomplished<br />

using a Hierarchical Holographic Modeling (HHM) approach<br />

and Multi-Objective Decision trees (MODT) to create an<br />

integrated method to analyze the critical risk factors that can<br />

be used in a decision-making framework.<br />

December 8-11, 2013 - Baltimore, MD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!