Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.4.2a Determine Process Area Capability Level Activity Description Required Practices Parameters and Limits When using the continuous representation of a CMMI model, the team may make rating judgments about each PA (and associated capability level) within the scope of the appraisal. Assigning capability level ratings is an optional activity, selected at the discretion of the appraisal sponsor and documented in the appraisal input. Rate the capability levels for each PA within the scope of the appraisal, based upon the highest level and all levels below for which its specific goals and the generic goals within the appraisal scope have been satisfied (if this rating option was selected during planning). The table below provides the criteria for deriving the capability level rating for each PA. Capability Engineering Process Areas Other Process Areas Level 0 Default Rating Default Rating 1 Generic goal for capability level 1 is rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied – including base practices only. 2 Generic goals for capability levels 1 and 2 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied – including specific practices at capability levels 1 and 2. 3 Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, and 3 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied – including specific practices at capability levels 1, 2, and 3. 4 Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied – including specific practices at capability levels 1, 2, and 3. 5 Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied – including specific practices at capability levels 1, 2, and 3. Generic goal for capability level 1 is rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied. Generic goals for capability levels 1 and 2 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied. Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, and 3 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied. Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied. Generic goals for capability levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are rated Satisfied. All specific goals are rated Satisfied. Continued on next page Page II-116 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
2.4.2a Determine Process Area Capability Level (continued) Optional Practices Implementation Guidance The rating of PA capability levels may be carried out top down or bottom up, as described below. The bottom up approach uses the following sequence: • Judge whether or not the PA can be considered to be at capability level 1, based on the satisfaction of specific and generic goals. In this case, only the base practices would be considered in rating goals. • Judge whether or not the PA can be considered to be at capability level 2, based on the satisfaction of specific and generic goals. In this case, the advanced practices for capability level 2 must be considered in rating the goals of the Engineering PAs. • Proceed incrementally until the team reaches a point at which the goals cannot be rated as satisfied. The top down approach uses the following sequence: • Begin at the highest desired capability level (which was determined during appraisal planning) and judge whether or not the PA can be considered to be operating at that capability level. • If the PA is not at the highest desired capability level, consider whether or not it can be judged to be operating at the next lower level. • Proceed incrementally until the team reaches a point at which all of the relevant goals are rated as satisfied, or goal ratings lead to capability level 0. The presence of advanced practices in the Engineering PAs creates a nuance in the rating process that can be complicated for some appraisal team members. If team members have only worked with the staged representation in the past, it is important that the appraisal team leader covers this nuance during team training, and prevents confusion during the rating process. Goal satisfaction is a judgment based on the implementation of practices that map to the goal. In rating the satisfaction of specific goals in the Engineering PAs, the set of specific practices that relates to the goals differs for capability levels 0, 1, 2, and 3 through 5. That is, depending on the capability level at which the rating is performed, there are up to 4 unique sets of specific practices associated with these specific goals that must be considered. The appraisal team leader is responsible for selecting one of the two optional rating approaches described above, and should facilitate this session carefully to prevent confusion among team members. CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001 Page II-117
Page 1:
Standard CMMI SM Appraisal Method f
Page 4 and 5:
This report was prepared for the SE
Page 6 and 7:
Focused Investigation 23 Practice I
Page 8 and 9:
2.2.2 Characterize Implementation o
Page 10 and 11:
I-vi CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 12 and 13:
I-viii CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 14 and 15:
I-x CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 16 and 17:
I-xii CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 18 and 19:
I-2 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 20 and 21:
Table I-2: Part II Contents Phase P
Page 22 and 23:
Part II People who will enact an ap
Page 24 and 25:
I-8 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 26 and 27:
As the CMMI Steward , the SEI suppo
Page 28 and 29:
Upon determining that sufficient co
Page 30 and 31:
I-14 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 32 and 33:
The SCAMPI method is also designed
Page 34 and 35:
Usage Mode Process Monitoring Descr
Page 36 and 37:
Method Concepts This section provid
Page 38 and 39:
quirement of the SCAMPI method. Fac
Page 40 and 41:
• Understand what objective evide
Page 42 and 43:
consider all aspects of the process
Page 44 and 45:
Characterizing Practices Verificati
Page 46 and 47:
els. Instruments can take various f
Page 48 and 49:
Method Description This section pro
Page 50 and 51:
I-34 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 52 and 53:
Table I-11: SCAMPI Phase Summary: C
Page 54 and 55:
Sponsor, Initial Requirements and C
Page 56 and 57:
2 Conduct Appraisal Appraisal Data,
Page 58 and 59:
Nominal Evaluation Schedule View An
Page 60 and 61:
Page II-2 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 62 and 63:
1.1 Analyze Requirements (continued
Page 64 and 65:
1.1.1 Determine Appraisal Objective
Page 66 and 67:
1.1.2 Determine Appraisal Constrain
Page 68 and 69:
1.1.3 Determine Appraisal Scope Act
Page 70 and 71:
1.1.3 Determine Appraisal Scope (co
Page 72 and 73:
1.1.4 Determine Outputs Activity De
Page 74 and 75:
1.1.5 Obtain Commitment to Appraisa
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
1.2 Develop Appraisal Plan (continu
Page 80 and 81:
1.2.1 Tailor Method Activity Descri
Page 82 and 83:
1.2.2 Identify Needed Resources Act
Page 84 and 85:
1.2.3 Determine Cost and Schedule A
Page 86 and 87:
1.2.4 Plan and Manage Logistics Act
Page 88 and 89:
1.2.6 Obtain Commitment to Appraisa
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
1.3 Select and Prepare Team (contin
Page 94 and 95:
1.3.1 Identify Team Leader Activity
Page 96 and 97:
1.3.2 Select Team Members Activity
Page 98 and 99:
1.3.3 Prepare Team Activity Descrip
Page 100 and 101:
1.3.3 Prepare Team (continued) Opti
Page 102 and 103:
1.3.3 Prepare Team (continued) Impl
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
1.4 Obtain and Analyze Initial Obje
Page 108 and 109:
1.4.1 Prepare Participants Activity
Page 110 and 111:
1.4.2 Administer Instruments Activi
Page 112 and 113:
1.4.3 Obtain Initial Objective Evid
Page 114 and 115:
1.4.4 Inventory Objective Evidence
Page 116 and 117:
1.4.4 Inventory Objective Evidence
Page 118 and 119:
1.5 Prepare for Collection of Objec
Page 120 and 121:
1.5.1 Perform Readiness Review Acti
Page 122 and 123:
1.5.2 Prepare Data Collection Plan
Page 124 and 125: 1.5.2 Prepare Data Collection Plan
Page 126 and 127: 1.5.3 Replan Data Collection Activi
Page 128 and 129: Page II-70 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 130 and 131: 2.1 Examine Objective Evidence (con
Page 132 and 133: 2.1.1 Examine Objective Evidence fr
Page 144 and 145: 2.2 Verify and Validate Objective E
Page 146 and 147: 2.2.1 Verify Objective Evidence Act
Page 148 and 149: 2.2.2 Characterize Implementation o
Page 150 and 151: 2.2.2 Characterize Implementation o
Page 152 and 153: 2.2.3 Validate Practice Implementat
Page 154 and 155: 2.2.3 Validate Practice Implementat
Page 156 and 157: Page II-98 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 158 and 159: 2.3 Document Objective Evidence (co
Page 160 and 161: 2.3.1 Take/Review/Tag Notes Activit
Page 162 and 163: 2.3.2 Record Presence/Absence of Ob
Page 164 and 165: 2.3.3 Document Practice Implementat
Page 166 and 167: 2.3.4 Review and Update the Data Co
Page 169 and 170: 2.4 Generate Appraisal Results Purp
Page 171 and 172: 2.4 Generate Appraisal Results (con
Page 173: 2.4.1 Derive Findings and Rate Goal
Page 177 and 178: 2.4.3a Determine Capability Profile
Page 179 and 180: 2.4.4 Document Appraisal Results Ac
Page 181 and 182: 3.1 Deliver Appraisal Results Purpo
Page 183 and 184: 3.1 Deliver Appraisal Results (cont
Page 185 and 186: 3.1.1 Present Final Findings (conti
Page 187 and 188: CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001 Page II-129
Page 189 and 190: 3.1.2 Conduct Executive Session(s)
Page 191 and 192: 3.1.3 Plan for Next Steps (continue
Page 193 and 194: 3.2 Package and Archive Appraisal A
Page 195 and 196: 3.2 Package and Archive Appraisal A
Page 197 and 198: 3.2.1 Collect Lessons Learned (cont
Page 199 and 200: 3.2.2 Generate Appraisal Record (co
Page 201 and 202: 3.2.4 Archive and/or Dispose of Key
Page 203 and 204: Part III: Appendices, References, a
Page 205 and 206: Appendix A Appraisal Disclosure Sta
Page 207 and 208: Appendix B The Role of Practice Imp
Page 209 and 210: time-consuming task of investigatin
Page 211 and 212: Direct Artifact This PII type is re
Page 213 and 214: Since models are necessarily expres
Page 215 and 216: Appendix C Focused Investigation El
Page 217 and 218: Appendix D ARC/MDD Traceability Tab
Page 219 and 220: ARC ID ARC Requirement MDD Process
Page 225 and 226:
ARC ID ARC Requirement MDD Process
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
References/Bibliography [AFMC 94] A
Page 235 and 236:
Glossary The MDD glossary defines m
Page 237 and 238:
the appraisal findings and ratings
Page 239 and 240:
ganization. (See verification-based
Page 241 and 242:
Implemented (PI) are not satisfied.
Page 243 and 244:
supplier). [derived from MDD method
Page 245:
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Appr
show all

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?