Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appraisal Disclosure Statement (ADS) A summary statement describing the ratings generated as outputs of the appraisal, and the conditions and constraints under which the appraisal was performed. The ADS should be used for public disclosures of maturity level or capability level ratings so they can be interpreted accurately. [local] appraisal findings The results of an appraisal that identify the most important issues, problems, or opportunities for process improvement within the appraisal scope. Appraisal findings are inferences drawn from valid observations. [CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal input The collection of appraisal information required before data collection can commence. [ISO 98C and ARC v1.1] appraisal method class A family of appraisal methods that satisfy a defined subset of requirements in the Appraisal Requirements for CMMI (ARC). These classes are defined so as to align with typical usage modes of appraisal methods. [derived from ARC v1.0, CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal modes of usage The contexts in which an appraisal method might be utilized. Appraisal modes of usage identified for the SCAMPI method include internal process improvement, supplier selection, and process monitoring. appraisal objectives appraisal output The desired outcome(s) of an appraisal process. [ARC v1.1] All of the tangible results from an appraisal (see “appraisal record”). [ISO 98C and ARC v1.1] appraisal participants Members of the organizational unit who participate in providing information during the appraisal. [CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal rating The value assigned by an appraisal team to either (a) a CMMI goal or process area, (b) the capability level of a process area, or (c) the maturity level of an organizational unit. The rating is determined by enacting the defined rating process for the appraisal method being employed. [CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal record III-34 An orderly, documented collection of information that is pertinent to the appraisal and adds to the understanding and verification of CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
the appraisal findings and ratings generated. [derived from ISO 98C and ARC v1.1] appraisal reference model The CMMI model to which an appraisal team correlates implemented process activities. [CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal scope The definition of the boundaries of the appraisal encompassing the organizational limits and the CMMI model limits within which the processes to be investigated operate. [derived from CMMI model glossary, ISO 98C and ARC v1.1] appraisal sponsor The individual, internal or external to the organization being appraised, who requires the appraisal to be performed, and provides financial or other resources to carry it out. [derived from ISO 98C and ARC v1.1] appraisal tailoring Selection of options within the appraisal method for use in a specific instance. The intent of tailoring is to assist an organization in aligning application of the method with its business needs and objectives. [CMMI model glossary and ARC v1.1] appraisal team leader The person who leads the activities of an appraisal and has satisfied the qualification criteria for experience, knowledge, and skills defined by the appraisal method. [ARC v1.1] artifact A tangible form of objective evidence indicative of work being performed that is a direct or indirect result of implementing a CMMI model practice. (See “direct artifact” and “indirect artifact.”) assessment An appraisal that an organization does to and for itself for the purposes of process improvement. [ARC v1.1] capability evaluation consensus An appraisal by a trained team of professionals used as a discriminator to select suppliers, for contract monitoring, or for incentives. Evaluations are used to gain insight into the process capability of a supplier organization and are intended to help decision makers make better acquisition decisions, improve subcontractor performance, and provide insight to a purchasing organization. [ARC v1.1] A method of decision making that allows team members to develop a common basis of understanding and develop general CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001 III-35
Page 1:
Standard CMMI SM Appraisal Method f
Page 4 and 5:
This report was prepared for the SE
Page 6 and 7:
Focused Investigation 23 Practice I
Page 8 and 9:
2.2.2 Characterize Implementation o
Page 10 and 11:
I-vi CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 12 and 13:
I-viii CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 14 and 15:
I-x CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 16 and 17:
I-xii CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 18 and 19:
I-2 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 20 and 21:
Table I-2: Part II Contents Phase P
Page 22 and 23:
Part II People who will enact an ap
Page 24 and 25:
I-8 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 26 and 27:
As the CMMI Steward , the SEI suppo
Page 28 and 29:
Upon determining that sufficient co
Page 30 and 31:
I-14 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 32 and 33:
The SCAMPI method is also designed
Page 34 and 35:
Usage Mode Process Monitoring Descr
Page 36 and 37:
Method Concepts This section provid
Page 38 and 39:
quirement of the SCAMPI method. Fac
Page 40 and 41:
• Understand what objective evide
Page 42 and 43:
consider all aspects of the process
Page 44 and 45:
Characterizing Practices Verificati
Page 46 and 47:
els. Instruments can take various f
Page 48 and 49:
Method Description This section pro
Page 50 and 51:
I-34 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 52 and 53:
Table I-11: SCAMPI Phase Summary: C
Page 54 and 55:
Sponsor, Initial Requirements and C
Page 56 and 57:
2 Conduct Appraisal Appraisal Data,
Page 58 and 59:
Nominal Evaluation Schedule View An
Page 60 and 61:
Page II-2 CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001
Page 62 and 63:
1.1 Analyze Requirements (continued
Page 64 and 65:
1.1.1 Determine Appraisal Objective
Page 66 and 67:
1.1.2 Determine Appraisal Constrain
Page 68 and 69:
1.1.3 Determine Appraisal Scope Act
Page 70 and 71:
1.1.3 Determine Appraisal Scope (co
Page 72 and 73:
1.1.4 Determine Outputs Activity De
Page 74 and 75:
1.1.5 Obtain Commitment to Appraisa
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
1.2 Develop Appraisal Plan (continu
Page 80 and 81:
1.2.1 Tailor Method Activity Descri
Page 82 and 83:
1.2.2 Identify Needed Resources Act
Page 84 and 85:
1.2.3 Determine Cost and Schedule A
Page 86 and 87:
1.2.4 Plan and Manage Logistics Act
Page 88 and 89:
1.2.6 Obtain Commitment to Appraisa
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
1.3 Select and Prepare Team (contin
Page 94 and 95:
1.3.1 Identify Team Leader Activity
Page 96 and 97:
1.3.2 Select Team Members Activity
Page 98 and 99:
1.3.3 Prepare Team Activity Descrip
Page 100 and 101:
1.3.3 Prepare Team (continued) Opti
Page 102 and 103:
1.3.3 Prepare Team (continued) Impl
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
1.4 Obtain and Analyze Initial Obje
Page 108 and 109:
1.4.1 Prepare Participants Activity
Page 110 and 111:
1.4.2 Administer Instruments Activi
Page 112 and 113:
1.4.3 Obtain Initial Objective Evid
Page 114 and 115:
1.4.4 Inventory Objective Evidence
Page 116 and 117:
1.4.4 Inventory Objective Evidence
Page 118 and 119:
1.5 Prepare for Collection of Objec
Page 120 and 121:
1.5.1 Perform Readiness Review Acti
Page 122 and 123:
1.5.2 Prepare Data Collection Plan
Page 124 and 125:
1.5.2 Prepare Data Collection Plan
Page 126 and 127:
1.5.3 Replan Data Collection Activi
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
2.1 Examine Objective Evidence (con
Page 132 and 133:
2.1.1 Examine Objective Evidence fr
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
2.2 Verify and Validate Objective E
Page 146 and 147:
2.2.1 Verify Objective Evidence Act
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
2.2.3 Validate Practice Implementat
Page 154 and 155:
2.2.3 Validate Practice Implementat
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
2.3 Document Objective Evidence (co
Page 160 and 161:
2.3.1 Take/Review/Tag Notes Activit
Page 162 and 163:
2.3.2 Record Presence/Absence of Ob
Page 164 and 165:
2.3.3 Document Practice Implementat
Page 166 and 167:
2.3.4 Review and Update the Data Co
Page 169 and 170:
2.4 Generate Appraisal Results Purp
Page 171 and 172:
2.4 Generate Appraisal Results (con
Page 173 and 174:
2.4.1 Derive Findings and Rate Goal
Page 175 and 176:
2.4.2a Determine Process Area Capab
Page 177 and 178:
2.4.3a Determine Capability Profile
Page 179 and 180:
2.4.4 Document Appraisal Results Ac
Page 181 and 182:
3.1 Deliver Appraisal Results Purpo
Page 183 and 184:
3.1 Deliver Appraisal Results (cont
Page 185 and 186: 3.1.1 Present Final Findings (conti
Page 187 and 188: CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001 Page II-129
Page 189 and 190: 3.1.2 Conduct Executive Session(s)
Page 191 and 192: 3.1.3 Plan for Next Steps (continue
Page 193 and 194: 3.2 Package and Archive Appraisal A
Page 195 and 196: 3.2 Package and Archive Appraisal A
Page 197 and 198: 3.2.1 Collect Lessons Learned (cont
Page 199 and 200: 3.2.2 Generate Appraisal Record (co
Page 201 and 202: 3.2.4 Archive and/or Dispose of Key
Page 203 and 204: Part III: Appendices, References, a
Page 205 and 206: Appendix A Appraisal Disclosure Sta
Page 207 and 208: Appendix B The Role of Practice Imp
Page 209 and 210: time-consuming task of investigatin
Page 211 and 212: Direct Artifact This PII type is re
Page 213 and 214: Since models are necessarily expres
Page 215 and 216: Appendix C Focused Investigation El
Page 217 and 218: Appendix D ARC/MDD Traceability Tab
Page 219 and 220: ARC ID ARC Requirement MDD Process
Page 233 and 234: References/Bibliography [AFMC 94] A
Page 235: Glossary The MDD glossary defines m
Page 239 and 240: ganization. (See verification-based
Page 241 and 242: Implemented (PI) are not satisfied.
Page 243 and 244: supplier). [derived from MDD method
Page 245: REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Appr
show all

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?