02.07.2014 Views

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARC ID ARC Requirement MDD <strong>Process</strong> MDD Activity Notes/Comments<br />

4.5.4.c (AB) At least one of the two data points must reflect work actually<br />

being done (e.g., process area implementation).<br />

2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

In <strong>SCAMPI</strong> v1.1, this is addressed by requirements<br />

<strong>for</strong> a direct artifact from each<br />

project <strong>for</strong> each practice (2.2.1). Affirmations<br />

also reflect work being done, but are not necessarily<br />

required from each project <strong>for</strong> each<br />

practice; affirmations are used to corroborate<br />

direct artifacts.<br />

4.5.5 The method shall require a mechanism <strong>for</strong> determining that<br />

sufficient data has been collected to cover the scope of the appraisal,<br />

according to the following minimum set of rules:<br />

4.5.5.a<br />

4.5.5.a.1<br />

2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

(A) A specific or generic practice has sufficient data coverage if 2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

validated observations exist <strong>for</strong> the practice and<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

are adequate to understand the extent of implementation of the<br />

practice<br />

2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

4.5.5.a.2 are representative of the organizational unit 2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

4.5.5.a.3<br />

4.5.5.b<br />

4.5.5.c<br />

are representative of the life-cycle phases in use within the<br />

organizational unit<br />

2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

(A) In a staged representation, a process area has sufficient data 2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

coverage if all of its specific and generic practices have sufficient<br />

data coverage.<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

(A) In a continuous representation, a process area has sufficient 2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

data coverage if all of its specific practices and the generic Objective Evidence<br />

practices within the appraisal scope have sufficient data coverage<br />

up through the capability level being investigated <strong>for</strong> the<br />

process area (e.g., the target capability level).<br />

4.5.6 (A) The method shall require a mechanism <strong>for</strong> consolidating<br />

observations into draft findings of strengths and weaknesses<br />

relative to the appraisal reference model.<br />

2.2 Verify and Validate<br />

Objective Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

2.2.1 Verify Objective<br />

Evidence<br />

3.7.3 Validate Practice<br />

Implementation Gaps<br />

Coverage is addressed by requirements <strong>for</strong><br />

objective evidence from each project <strong>for</strong> each<br />

practice (2.2.1). See also 1.5.3, Replan Data<br />

Collection, <strong>for</strong> collection of additional objective<br />

evidence necessary to obtain sufficient<br />

coverage.<br />

See 3.1.3 <strong>for</strong> selection of instantiations representative<br />

of the organizational unit.<br />

See also descriptions of documenting objective<br />

evidence in 3.8, and rating in 3.9.<br />

Preliminary findings are described in 3.7.3.<br />

III-26<br />

CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!