07.09.2014 Views

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (1/12) 286 (a)<br />

The Department of Health guidelines require that proposals for significant reconfigurations<br />

are subject to initial clinical assurance by the National Clinical Advisory Team (NCAT). In line<br />

with this requirement a visit by NCAT took place in <strong>January</strong> <strong>2012</strong> and whilst we have yet to<br />

receive their written report, their verbal feedback endorsed the clinical case for change and<br />

the need to consolidate acute stroke and TIA services on one site. They strongly supported<br />

the direction of travel and if anything were surprised these changes had not already been<br />

made. NCAT felt both of the short listed service models were appropriate.<br />

Options<br />

The Project Board and Steering Group through several staff engagement events developed a<br />

long list of options along with a set of evaluation criteria and a short listing process. Using the<br />

agreed evaluation criteria and weighting the long list of 6 options were scored by 3<br />

stakeholder groups: –<br />

1. Local patients and carers who are stroke and TIA experts by experience<br />

2. Stroke Reconfiguration Project Steering Group<br />

3. Clinical staff from all relevant professions working in stroke and TIA services at SWBH<br />

at a ‘Listening into Action’ event.<br />

GPs have subsequently been engaged by the project team on a one to one basis with<br />

representation across the relevant <strong>Sandwell</strong> and <strong>West</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Clinical Commissioning<br />

Group (SWBCCG) to discuss the proposed short list and the process. All the individual GPs<br />

consulted were satisfied with the process that had been undertaken and stated preferences<br />

for the short listed options. The Project Board then identified the two options with the highest<br />

scores as the short list. These are:<br />

Option 3: A single site model with all inpatient (acute and rehabilitation) stroke, Neurology<br />

and TIA facilities and services located at one Hospital.<br />

Option 6: A two site model with one hyper-acute stroke unit, acut Neurology inpatients and<br />

high risk TIA services located at one Hospital. Rehabilitation services would be provided at<br />

both City and <strong>Sandwell</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong>.<br />

At this stage no clear clinical reasons had been identified to suggest which of the City and<br />

<strong>Sandwell</strong> Hospital sites the acute services should be located on. Subsequently a high level<br />

scoping analysis has been undertaken around the areas of activity, capacity, facilities, staffing<br />

and finance. Whilst the Trust is currently engaged in discussions with commissioners on the<br />

overall funding settlement for services in 12/13, the findings from this work confirm that the<br />

impact associated with the short listed options are within the boundaries of what would<br />

normally be affordable to the health economy taking account of capacity and feasibility and<br />

that the variations between placing the acute services on either City or <strong>Sandwell</strong> Hospital are<br />

not significant enough to discount either site at this stage. As a result it is proposed that each<br />

or the short listed options has two variant options with one locating acute services at the City<br />

site and the other at the <strong>Sandwell</strong> site giving four short listed options for consultation. It is<br />

important to recognise however, that further, more detailed work will need to be undertaken in<br />

each of these areas, for each of the short listed options with the findings being fed into the<br />

decision making process that will be undertaken at the end of consultation, to determine a<br />

preferred option. It should also be noted that at this stage all options appear likely to require<br />

some capital investment.<br />

It was agreed that the options of Do Nothing and retain the current configuration but introduce<br />

new ways of working for medical teams in order to provide acceptable levels of cover at all<br />

times would not be scored as they did not meet the clinical drivers for change in terms of<br />

consolidating acute stroke and TIA services in order to provide the critical mass of expertise<br />

and skills that could meet the standards in a consistent was and deliver improved clinical<br />

outcomes. They will however need to be included in the next stage of detailed financial<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!