07.09.2014 Views

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBAC (12/11) 068<br />

6 Governance matters<br />

6.1 Self‐assessment of the Audit Committee’s effectiveness<br />

SWBAC (12/11) 055<br />

SWBAC (12/11) 055 (a)<br />

Mr White presented the list of questions from the Audit Committee<br />

Handbook that would be used to undertake an assessment of the<br />

effectiveness of the Audit Committee. The Committee’s attention was<br />

drawn to the changes to the questions given the recent revisions to the<br />

Handbook.<br />

The Committee was advised that the self‐assessment would be completed<br />

by a subset of the Audit Committee prior to the next meeting and would be<br />

presented for comments at the meeting scheduled for 9 February <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

ACTION:<br />

Mr Grainger‐Payne to convene a subset of the Audit<br />

Committee to prepare an initial self‐assessment of the<br />

Audit Committee’s effectiveness<br />

6.2 Response to the letter from the Chair of NHS <strong>West</strong> Midlands: Data<br />

Quality Assurance<br />

SWBAC (12/11) 067<br />

SWBAC (12/11) 067 (a)<br />

SWBAC (12/11) 067 (b)<br />

Mr White reminded the Committee that a letter had been received from<br />

the Chair of NHS <strong>West</strong> Midlands seeking assurances that the Trust was<br />

considering its responsibilities in respect of data quality. He advised that<br />

the key consideration concerned the integrity of the information that was<br />

used to inform the performance against the NHS Performance Framework<br />

and the associated governance rating. As such, the Committee was<br />

informed that work had been undertaken to develop criteria that enable<br />

the various pieces of information to be ranked according to risk and to<br />

provide an indication as to whether the data was of good quality.<br />

Mrs Hunjan reported that Mr Trotman had questioned how the integrity of<br />

the data was maintained at all points in a system. Mr White advised that<br />

the matter concerned not only assurances on the quality of the data itself<br />

but also on the process by which it is generated. Mr Gayle agreed that a<br />

sound process was critical to guaranteeing the integrity of data.<br />

Mrs Hunjan encouraged greater attention to be given to reviewing the data<br />

quality of those pieces of information seen to be highest risk.<br />

Mr Capener remarked that he was encouraged by the work and in<br />

particular the plan to assess the risks around the various data workstreams.<br />

Professor Alderson noted that the data sources were all internal, apart<br />

from Dr Foster and highlighted that there was little control that the Trust<br />

could be expected to have over the integrity of data from external sources.<br />

It was agreed that a further update on the plans to review data quality<br />

should be considered at the next meeting.<br />

Page 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!