January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SWBTB (1/12) 286 (a)<br />
A Project Board has been established and is chaired by Janine Brown (Project Director,<br />
<strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT) who is the Senior Responsible Officer (SRO) for the project. A Project<br />
Steering Group has also been set up and has clinical representatives from a range of<br />
specialities and disciplines. This is chaired by Dr Deva Situnayake, one of our Deputy<br />
Medical Directors.<br />
The structured project methodology is set out in the Project Initiation Document (PID) with the<br />
main objectives of the project being to maximise the potential for acute stroke and TIA care to<br />
be delivered at optimal levels of quality and efficiency at SWBH. Through the project a<br />
preferred option will be identified and this should:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Meet national, regional and local standards of care and deliver safe and effective<br />
stroke and TIA care for the people of <strong>Sandwell</strong> and <strong>West</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong>.<br />
Improve the health outcomes of the stroke population in the short, medium and long<br />
term.<br />
Meet local commissioning intentions (including emerging CCGs) and meet the clinical<br />
needs of patients and carers as well as being delivered in an integrated way with<br />
relevant services in the acute sector and the community.<br />
Deliver stroke and TIA services that sustain performance that exceed expected<br />
thresholds in the national Vital Signs/Integrated Performance Measures and Cardiac<br />
and Stroke Network measures derived from the national stroke strategy.<br />
Deliver excellent levels of patient/carer satisfaction.<br />
In line with national guidance the potential need for formal public consultation if the<br />
reconfiguration resulted in the removal of a range of clinical services from one hospital, was<br />
tested with the Joint Health Scrutiny Committee at an early stage who confirmed that formal<br />
public consultation would be a likely requirement. On this basis and again in line with national<br />
guidance the project requires external reviews including:<br />
An assessment from the National Clinical Advisory Team (described in section 7<br />
below) and<br />
Office of Government Commerce Gateway Reviews.<br />
5.1 Gateway Review<br />
A series of Gateway reviews will be required at key points in the project. The Gateway<br />
review process examines a project at key decision points in order to provide assurance that<br />
the project can progress successfully to the next stage and is designed to provide<br />
independent guidance to the Senior Responsible Officer of the project on how best to ensure<br />
that the project is successful.<br />
An initial Gateway Review of this project was undertaken 10 th -12 th <strong>January</strong> <strong>2012</strong> with the<br />
purpose of assessing the project’s readiness to go to formal public consultation.<br />
The outcome of this review was that the delivery confidence assessment status for the project<br />
is:<br />
• Amber i.e. Successful delivery appears feasible but issues require management<br />
attention. The issues appear resolvable at this stage of the programme/project if<br />
addressed promptly.<br />
The Gateway Review Team commented that:<br />
‘The team’s stakeholder engagement and management, including clinical involvement within<br />
the Acute Trust, Local Authority HOSC relationship and a willingness from Primary Care to<br />
participate fully in implementation, is also to be commended.’<br />
The Gateway Review made the following 6 recommendations:<br />
11