07.09.2014 Views

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (1/12) 276 (a)<br />

Summary of our findings<br />

for the essential standards of quality and safety<br />

Our current overall judgement<br />

<strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital was meeting all the essential standards<br />

of quality and safety.<br />

The summary below describes why we carried out this review, what we found and any<br />

action required.<br />

Why we carried out this review<br />

We carried out this review to check whether <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital had made<br />

improvements in relation to:<br />

Outcome 01 - Respecting and involving people who use services<br />

Outcome 05 - Meeting nutritional needs<br />

How we carried out this review<br />

We reviewed all the information we hold about this provider, carried out a visit on 16<br />

December 2011, observed how people were being cared for, looked at records of people<br />

who use services, talked to staff and talked to people who use services.<br />

What people told us<br />

<strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital is part of <strong>Sandwell</strong> and <strong>West</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> NHS Trust<br />

(the trust). In March 2011 and August 2011 we carried out reviews of <strong>Sandwell</strong> General<br />

Hospital. These reviews were part of a targeted inspection programme in acute National<br />

Health Service (NHS) hospitals to assess how well older people are treated during their<br />

hospital stay. In particular we focused on whether people were treated with dignity and<br />

respect and whether people's nutritional needs were being met. Both our March 2011 and<br />

August 2011 reviews showed that <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital was not compliant with the<br />

outcome areas we assessed which were:<br />

Outcome 01- Respecting and involving people who use services (we assessed that there<br />

were moderate concerns in this area both in March and August 2011).<br />

Outcome 05- Meeting nutritional needs (we assessed that there were major concerns in<br />

this area in March 2011 and minor concerns in August 2011).<br />

Following our August 2011 review the trust closed a ward called Newton 4 as this is the<br />

ward where we identified shortfalls and concerns.The trust have kept us updated with their<br />

plans to make improvements.<br />

We carried out this December 2011 review to check whether <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital<br />

had made improvements. The wide range of evidence that we gathered during this review<br />

Page 2 of 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!