January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
January 2012 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SWBTB (1/12) 276 (a)<br />
Summary of our findings<br />
for the essential standards of quality and safety<br />
Our current overall judgement<br />
<strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital was meeting all the essential standards<br />
of quality and safety.<br />
The summary below describes why we carried out this review, what we found and any<br />
action required.<br />
Why we carried out this review<br />
We carried out this review to check whether <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital had made<br />
improvements in relation to:<br />
Outcome 01 - Respecting and involving people who use services<br />
Outcome 05 - Meeting nutritional needs<br />
How we carried out this review<br />
We reviewed all the information we hold about this provider, carried out a visit on 16<br />
December 2011, observed how people were being cared for, looked at records of people<br />
who use services, talked to staff and talked to people who use services.<br />
What people told us<br />
<strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital is part of <strong>Sandwell</strong> and <strong>West</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> NHS Trust<br />
(the trust). In March 2011 and August 2011 we carried out reviews of <strong>Sandwell</strong> General<br />
Hospital. These reviews were part of a targeted inspection programme in acute National<br />
Health Service (NHS) hospitals to assess how well older people are treated during their<br />
hospital stay. In particular we focused on whether people were treated with dignity and<br />
respect and whether people's nutritional needs were being met. Both our March 2011 and<br />
August 2011 reviews showed that <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital was not compliant with the<br />
outcome areas we assessed which were:<br />
Outcome 01- Respecting and involving people who use services (we assessed that there<br />
were moderate concerns in this area both in March and August 2011).<br />
Outcome 05- Meeting nutritional needs (we assessed that there were major concerns in<br />
this area in March 2011 and minor concerns in August 2011).<br />
Following our August 2011 review the trust closed a ward called Newton 4 as this is the<br />
ward where we identified shortfalls and concerns.The trust have kept us updated with their<br />
plans to make improvements.<br />
We carried out this December 2011 review to check whether <strong>Sandwell</strong> General Hospital<br />
had made improvements. The wide range of evidence that we gathered during this review<br />
Page 2 of 14