07.11.2014 Views

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 Noise quantification in this work 109<br />

As mentioned before, <strong>the</strong> fitting method can be easily extended to greater dimensionality. If, for instance,<br />

a correlation fringe pattern is to be evaluated, two degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom, namely I b <strong>and</strong> M I , are added <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> algorithm can determine <strong>the</strong> fringe visibility in IR 5 . More complicated fringe structures could also be<br />

treated. But every new variable increases <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> iteration steps as well as <strong>the</strong> time for a single<br />

iteration, so that <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> speed gains importance in such applications.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> resulting measurements <strong>of</strong> σ ∆ϕ will mostly appear converted to graphs <strong>of</strong> σ d in <strong>the</strong> following<br />

chapters, it may be helpful at this point to provide <strong>the</strong> reader with a pictorial representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> noise. The image parts grouped in Fig. 4.7 are taken from an out-<strong>of</strong>-plane TPS measurement<br />

series with decreasing object illumination.<br />

Fig. 4.7: Image segments from results <strong>of</strong> deformation measurements using TPS with varying, <strong>and</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r weak,<br />

object illumination. σ ∆ϕ as grey values: 13.3, 21.2, 28.0, 40.3, 51.9 <strong>and</strong> 63.1; as phase: 18.8°, 30.0°, 39.5°,<br />

56.9°, 73.3° <strong>and</strong> 89.0°, in obvious order.<br />

The last sawtooth image in <strong>the</strong> figure is hardly discernible as such <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore raises <strong>the</strong> question<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r results like this are <strong>of</strong> any use at all. It turned out, however, that <strong>the</strong> filtering procedure described<br />

in section 4.1.2.2 still improved <strong>the</strong> image sufficiently to enable correct unwrapping; but as explained<br />

above, <strong>the</strong> phase error could be determined without doing so. O<strong>the</strong>r examples <strong>of</strong> sawtooth images severely<br />

degraded by syn<strong>the</strong>tic Gaussian noise have been presented in [Kad97].<br />

From <strong>the</strong> preceding overview <strong>of</strong> methods, it is clear that <strong>the</strong> approach to noise quantification presented<br />

here is new only in that it avoids unwrapping before <strong>the</strong> best-plane fit; however, it is <strong>the</strong> only strategy<br />

known to me that can generate noise-free data with no user interaction – except for <strong>the</strong> input <strong>of</strong> starting<br />

parameters – even from <strong>the</strong> worst <strong>of</strong> results, <strong>and</strong> is hence free <strong>of</strong> arbitrariness. While this may not always<br />

be necessary, it is desirable from a methodological point <strong>of</strong> view.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!