07.11.2014 Views

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

Application and Optimisation of the Spatial Phase Shifting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 Second-order speckle statistics 35<br />

2<br />

⎛ z ⎞<br />

∆z = 8λ ⎜ ⎟ = l<br />

⎝ D⎠<br />

s ; (2.45)<br />

see also [Li 92, Yos93]. The quadratic relationship <strong>of</strong> l s <strong>and</strong> z generates more <strong>and</strong> more elongated speckles<br />

– <strong>the</strong> aspect ratio is proportional to z – that are "cigars" only near <strong>the</strong> scatterer or aperture, <strong>and</strong> "worms" in<br />

most practical cases (cf. [Wei77]): for z/D=1.5, l s /d s is already 10.<br />

2.3.2 <strong>Phase</strong> autocorrelation<br />

It is clear that <strong>the</strong> phase structure <strong>of</strong> speckle patterns affects speckle interferometry as significantly as does<br />

<strong>the</strong> intensity structure. Again, especially for SPS it is useful to find out how <strong>the</strong> phase <strong>of</strong> a speckle pattern<br />

will fluctuate statistically, <strong>and</strong> over what distances we may expect to find some phase correlation.<br />

Unfortunately, ϕ is accessible modulo 2π only, which is difficult to treat ma<strong>the</strong>matically: if we map <strong>the</strong><br />

phases onto [–π,π), two points with ϕ 1 (x 1 ,y 1 )= –π+ε <strong>and</strong> ϕ 2 (x 2 ,y 2 )=π–ε would yield ∆ϕ = ϕ 2 –ϕ 1 = 2π–2ε,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> actual difference is only 2ε.<br />

Consequently, <strong>the</strong>re are two ways to deal with ϕ. The first one regards ϕ as a continuous function without<br />

–ππ jumps, which can lead to problems with path-dependence in complicated phase distributions with<br />

dislocations, such as speckle phase fields. The o<strong>the</strong>r confines ϕ to [–π,π), which makes it a unique but<br />

discontinuous (wrapped) function.<br />

For continuous phases, <strong>the</strong> phase autocorrelation function has been calculated long ago [Mid60] as that <strong>of</strong><br />

a b<strong>and</strong>-limited r<strong>and</strong>om signal, an example <strong>of</strong> which is speckle noise (as for <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong> limitation, see 3.3.1).<br />

If <strong>the</strong> primary phase interval is set to [–π, π), <strong>the</strong> function reads<br />

2<br />

( ) π ( ) ( )<br />

Rϕ , c µ A = arcsin µ A − arcsin µ A +<br />

1<br />

2<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=<br />

1<br />

µ<br />

2n<br />

A<br />

2<br />

n<br />

, (2.46)<br />

with µ A , <strong>the</strong> complex degree <strong>of</strong> coherence, to be calculated from <strong>the</strong> scatterer's characteristics; <strong>the</strong><br />

subscript c st<strong>and</strong>s for "continuous". A primary phase interval <strong>of</strong> [0, 2π) would correspond to a "bias<br />

phase" <strong>of</strong> π <strong>and</strong> merely add a constant <strong>of</strong> π² to <strong>the</strong> function.<br />

For discontinuous phases, <strong>the</strong> decrease in correlation has particular properties because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> –ππ<br />

transitions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phase taken as real 2π jumps; this function has been established only recently [Fre96a]<br />

<strong>and</strong> reads<br />

1<br />

⎛<br />

Rϕ , d ( µ A) = ⎜<br />

2 1<br />

π arcsin( Re( µ A)<br />

) + arcsin ( Re( µ A)<br />

) −<br />

2 ⎜<br />

⎝<br />

2<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=<br />

1<br />

Re<br />

( µ )<br />

n<br />

A<br />

2<br />

2n<br />

⎞<br />

⎟ ,<br />

⎟<br />

(2.47)<br />

⎠<br />

where <strong>the</strong> subscript d denotes <strong>the</strong> discontinuous interpretation. Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> functions are evaluated for n=1<br />

to 100, with µ A according to (2.42), <strong>and</strong> shown in Fig. 2.21. The scaling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ordinate reflects <strong>the</strong> fact

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!