Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 20<br />
Economic e valuation of o besity i nterventions<br />
Marj Moodie <strong>and</strong> Rob Carter<br />
Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia<br />
Summary <strong>and</strong> recommendations<br />
for research<br />
• To date, most health economics studies have focused<br />
on “describing ” <strong>and</strong> “predicting ” the magnitude of<br />
the obesity problem. This type of economic study<br />
alone does little to address the issue of obesity.<br />
• T he fi ght against obesity requires a “solutions-based ”<br />
rather than a “problem-focused ” approach. The<br />
economic evaluation of specific interventions <strong>and</strong><br />
strategies to reduce the obesity problem offers the<br />
most valuable contribution of health economics.<br />
• Rigorous evaluation of potential interventions is<br />
important so that policy - makers know “ what<br />
works ” <strong>and</strong> “what offers value for money ” . However,<br />
interventions with the best prospects for preventing<br />
obesity are likely to pose particular challenges for<br />
economic evaluation.<br />
• Furthermore, economists must move beyond evaluation<br />
of single interventions to priority setting, <strong>and</strong><br />
assist in the packaging of interventions into coordinated<br />
obesity prevention strategies.<br />
Introduction<br />
Why should economists work in the field of obesity<br />
prevention? What wisdom can they bring to bear on<br />
the issue that could make a difference to the prevalence<br />
<strong>and</strong> consequences of obesity? This chapter<br />
explores the role <strong>and</strong> content of economic analysis,<br />
summarizes the contribution which the discipline<br />
<strong>Preventing</strong> <strong>Childhood</strong> <strong>Obesity</strong>. Edited by<br />
E. Waters, B.A. Swinburn, J.C. Seidell <strong>and</strong> R. Uauy.<br />
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing.<br />
currently makes, <strong>and</strong> considers the contribution it<br />
could make to the fight against obesity. It draws on<br />
current research activity in the field to illustrate some<br />
of the specific methodological challenges that confront<br />
health economists working in the obesity field,<br />
<strong>and</strong> discusses the directions which economic research<br />
needs to take if the discipline is to make a positive <strong>and</strong><br />
effective contribution to the search for solutions to the<br />
obesity crisis.<br />
Why i nvolve e conomics?<br />
To assess the credentials of health economics to make<br />
a contribution, one must first appreciate the nature<br />
of economics <strong>and</strong> the roles which it performs. The<br />
fundamental problem addressed by economists is<br />
the allocation of scarce resources between competing<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>s — that is, how to maximize community<br />
welfare with available resources. In addressing<br />
resource scarcity, economists carry out four separate<br />
but interrelated tasks: “description ” , “prediction ” ,<br />
“explanation ” <strong>and</strong> “evaluation ” .<br />
1<br />
Describing <strong>and</strong> p rojecting the c ost<br />
b urden of o besity<br />
Economics enables us to “ describe ” current activities,<br />
health status <strong>and</strong> resource use, <strong>and</strong> to “ predict ” future<br />
trends in the same. To date, most of health economics ’<br />
contribution to obesity prevention has centered on<br />
these two aspects. The past decade has seen a proliferation<br />
of descriptive studies which either documented<br />
the size of the disease <strong>and</strong> cost burden<br />
attributable to obesity in particular demographic<br />
groups or geographical jurisdictions, or made<br />
167