21.11.2014 Views

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9<br />

meal frequency, decreased physical activity, watching<br />

television > 1 h/day, formula feeding <strong>and</strong> smoking in<br />

pregnancy accounted for 48.2% of obese children aged<br />

5 –6 years. Modification of these risk factors will potentially<br />

yield a maximal achievable prevalence reduction<br />

of 1.5% for obesity (3.2% observed prevalence). 19<br />

As mothers increasingly work outside the home, the<br />

percentage of pre - school children being cared for<br />

outside the home has also increased. For that reason,<br />

parents <strong>and</strong> child - care providers are sharing responsibility<br />

in the formation of children ’ s healthy behaviors<br />

during these important early developmental<br />

years. Level of physical activity <strong>and</strong> quality of food in<br />

these centers 20,21 has the potential to contribute substantially<br />

to the observed acceleration of obesity<br />

among preschool children attending day care centers<br />

during the past two decades. 22 A recent review of<br />

interventions in a variety of locations — home, day<br />

care, preschool, <strong>and</strong> clinic — to prevent or treat obesity<br />

among preschool children found seven studies of<br />

which four reported significant reduction in weight<br />

status or body fat. 23 Showing that interventions to<br />

reduce known risk factors from pregnancy through<br />

the early years in these settings has a great potential to<br />

prevent overweight <strong>and</strong> obesity in early childhood.<br />

Method<br />

For this chapter we scanned <strong>and</strong> reviewed the published<br />

literature (e.g., PubMed <strong>and</strong> CINAHL) to select<br />

studies that were effective, <strong>and</strong> examined the key elements<br />

that were consistent across the studies. With<br />

input from both authors, the evidence was synthesized<br />

<strong>and</strong> integrated into recommendations. Although<br />

there is no specific focus on social inequalities, this<br />

chapter examines cultural <strong>and</strong> gender differences in<br />

intervention effects <strong>and</strong> also looks at both behavioral<br />

<strong>and</strong> environmental interventions to find equitable <strong>and</strong><br />

sustainable solutions.<br />

Interventions d uring p regnancy<br />

Concerning prenatal factors, a recent review of risk<br />

factors for overweight in preschool children found<br />

strong evidence for a direct association between childhood<br />

overweight <strong>and</strong> maternal pre - pregnancy body<br />

size, maternal weight gain <strong>and</strong> smoking during<br />

pregnancy. 8 On the matter of interventions, there are<br />

currently four published studies on interventions to<br />

24 – 27<br />

prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy<br />

<strong>and</strong> more than 50 r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled studies on<br />

smoking cessation. 28 – 31 No studies evaluated the long -<br />

term effect on weight status of young children.<br />

Only one of the four studies on gestational weight<br />

gain included birth weight as an outcome. Gray -<br />

Donald et al 24 based their design on social learning<br />

theory, compared 107 control subjects <strong>and</strong> 112 women<br />

who received diet <strong>and</strong> activity intervention during<br />

pregnancy in four Cree communities of James Bay,<br />

Quebec. Intervention consisted of regular, individual<br />

diet counseling, physical activity sessions <strong>and</strong> other<br />

activities related to nutrition, but did not result in<br />

differences in diet measured at 24 – 30 weeks ’ gestation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> rate of weight gain over the second half of pregnancy<br />

(0.53 ± 0.32 kg per week vs. 0.53 ± 0.27 kg<br />

per week). Mean birth weights were also similar<br />

(3741 ± 523 g vs. 3686 ± 686 g).<br />

A Cochrane review of interventions promoting<br />

smoking cessation published in 2004 shows that<br />

smoking cessation programs in pregnancy were effective<br />

at reducing the proportion of women who continued<br />

to smoke, <strong>and</strong> also reducing low birth weight<br />

<strong>and</strong> preterm birth. 31 No studies investigated the effect<br />

on child obesity later in life.<br />

Together, these studies demonstrate that pregnancy<br />

is an important time for intervention. At present,<br />

however, there are not enough studies to identify<br />

effective interventions during pregnancy for preventing<br />

obesity among infants <strong>and</strong> preschool children.<br />

More interventions need to be implemented <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluated. Future studies should consider a multi -<br />

component approach <strong>and</strong> have a longer - term follow -<br />

up of child anthropometric outcome.<br />

Interventions to<br />

p romote b reastfeeding<br />

Numerous interventions have been conducted to<br />

promote breastfeeding. 32 However, only one cluster -<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized trial of a breastfeeding promotion<br />

examined the effect on child weight status beyond<br />

infancy. From the total of 17,046 healthy breastfed<br />

infants enrolled in the Promotion of Breastfeeding<br />

Intervention Trial (PROBIT ) in the Republic of<br />

Belarus, Kramer et al 33 followed 13,889 (81.5%) subjects<br />

with measurements of anthropometric variables<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!