Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 32<br />
<strong>and</strong> reflect the circumstances of the individuals <strong>and</strong><br />
families in their home country. The health status of<br />
a skilled migrant may be very different from a<br />
person who has fled a country affected by famine<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or war. Their visa status may also determine<br />
their level of access to employment <strong>and</strong> support<br />
services in their host country.<br />
• Relocation to another country is often a period of<br />
disruption in terms of housing, employment <strong>and</strong><br />
secure income . These issues are likely to take precedence<br />
over non - critical health considerations.<br />
• L a ck of health education in home countries <strong>and</strong><br />
limited family support <strong>and</strong> social connectedness<br />
in the host country may reduce the capacity of families<br />
to engage in health promoting practices.<br />
• Acculturation can increase awareness <strong>and</strong> knowledge<br />
of healthy lifestyle options in the host country.<br />
However, this takes time. In many cases it is the<br />
children who acquire this knowledge first, but<br />
without the benefit of an adult ’ s maturity in decision<br />
making. Therefore, while they are in a position<br />
to inform the family choices, the transfer of knowledge<br />
may not take place. This is supported by recent<br />
research findings in Australia which show that use<br />
of the English language at home is a strong protective<br />
factor against overweight <strong>and</strong> obesity for boys. 10<br />
This suggests that parents with greater proficiency<br />
in the main language of the host country may have<br />
greater access to nutritional information to support<br />
healthy dietary habits.<br />
These are all likely to be issues affecting minority<br />
groups <strong>and</strong> their interaction with obesity prevention<br />
research <strong>and</strong> programs.<br />
Who s hould r epresent<br />
the c ommunity?<br />
Guidelines on culturally competent strategies in<br />
health research <strong>and</strong> programs consistently call for<br />
participatory approaches based on developed relationships<br />
<strong>and</strong> partnerships. 11,12 The challenge in<br />
implementing this approach is in knowing who the<br />
appropriate partner is, that is, who represents the<br />
community. This will vary considerably. For new <strong>and</strong><br />
emerging communities it may be a gradual process of<br />
getting to know community members <strong>and</strong> networks<br />
<strong>and</strong> identifying individuals with capacity <strong>and</strong> influence<br />
in their community who are interested in sup-<br />
porting the research <strong>and</strong> program initiatives. Some<br />
minority groups will have established community<br />
organizations or community leaders who are expected<br />
to take that role. However, there may also be competing<br />
interests between different groups within a given<br />
cultural community. In these cases it is very important<br />
to allow an initial period of time to explore these different<br />
roles <strong>and</strong> to be transparent about who is being<br />
consulted. It is also important to determine if the<br />
community leaders are able to truly represent the<br />
interests of the target community members. For<br />
example, is the male religious leader of a community<br />
able to represent the daily experiences of a mother<br />
trying to provide healthy meals for her family? In these<br />
cases, it is clearly valuable to engage mothers but this<br />
should be negotiated through the community leader<br />
as a trusted <strong>and</strong> respected community representative.<br />
There are many cultural differences in accepted ways<br />
to communicate between genders <strong>and</strong> so the gender<br />
of the researcher <strong>and</strong> the setting of interactions with<br />
research or program participants need to be negotiated<br />
in advance.<br />
As always, it is important to be aware of potential<br />
power differences in research <strong>and</strong> community<br />
program relationships. This is particularly important<br />
in interactions with minority groups if previous traumatic<br />
experiences or gendered roles have contributed<br />
to a feeling of vulnerability, suspicion of perceived<br />
authority figures, or lack of experience with research.<br />
The benefits of this considered approach to identifying<br />
<strong>and</strong> engaging community representatives are<br />
self - evident. The time involved in building trusted<br />
relationships will save time <strong>and</strong> resources as the<br />
research <strong>and</strong> community program progresses. 13<br />
However, can this culturally competent approach be<br />
supported in a community context with multiple<br />
minority groups? In these circumstances it is extremely<br />
valuable to conduct preliminary pilot work on the<br />
feasibility of the study design <strong>and</strong> the methodology<br />
to ensure appropriate time <strong>and</strong> resources have been<br />
allocated to meet the needs of culturally diverse<br />
communities. 11<br />
How c an c ommunity i nvolvement<br />
b e s upported?<br />
Factors likely to impact on the way in which community<br />
groups are engaged in the research <strong>and</strong><br />
278