Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Community interventions—planning for sustainability<br />
integrated into other systems <strong>and</strong> structures <strong>and</strong> build<br />
on other areas of the community ’ s capacity. 6<br />
Principles of e valuation<br />
Evaluation is covered in Chapter 19 in detail, but<br />
some principles as they apply to the planning stages<br />
are outlined here. It is very important that the<br />
approach <strong>and</strong> framework for evaluation are developed<br />
concurrently in the program planning phase. 12 The<br />
capacity to conduct the evaluation needs to match<br />
the size <strong>and</strong> scope of the evaluation intended. The<br />
framework or evaluation plan should contain options<br />
for measuring process, impact <strong>and</strong> outcomes of<br />
the implementation. Outcome <strong>and</strong> impact evaluation<br />
correspond to changes in the program ’ s aims <strong>and</strong><br />
objectives. For well - evaluated demonstration projects,<br />
these would include changes in anthropometry,<br />
behaviors (skills, knowledge), environments <strong>and</strong><br />
4<br />
capacity. Ideally, an economic evaluation should<br />
be conducted to contribute to the evidence of cost –<br />
effectiveness <strong>and</strong> optimal implementation. The use of<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard measures <strong>and</strong> tools will enable a com parison<br />
with other programs/projects. Documenting lessons<br />
learnt is valuable in dissemination <strong>and</strong> can contribute<br />
to the evidence of what does, or does not, work. The<br />
context for evaluation needs consideration as current<br />
organizational, policy, <strong>and</strong> community contextual<br />
factors can have a major impact on the outcomes.<br />
Evaluation findings need to be disseminated within<br />
the community in the first instance <strong>and</strong> this should<br />
occur as the findings become available so that knowledge<br />
transfer can be applied back in the community.<br />
At the next level, translation of evidence from research<br />
into policy <strong>and</strong> practice is required for a continuous<br />
response to obesity at the public health policy level.<br />
Key c hallenges in<br />
e stablishing <strong>and</strong> s ustaining<br />
c ommunity i nterventions<br />
The very nature of community - based interventions<br />
creates challenges because they are inevitably complex<br />
to implement <strong>and</strong> evaluate, they are always contextual,<br />
<strong>and</strong> are usually poorly resourced. However, a few<br />
particular challenges in existing <strong>and</strong> future commu-<br />
nity approaches to obesity prevention warrant special<br />
mention.<br />
Sufficient i nvestment in p rograms<br />
<strong>and</strong> e valuations<br />
The time lag from the early signs of the obesity epidemic<br />
in the early 1980s to the first phase of community<br />
- based demonstration projects in a few countries<br />
in the mid - 2000s was substantial <strong>and</strong>, even now, the<br />
funding investment to build the evidence base for<br />
effectiveness has remained very low. Government -<br />
funded programs traditionally provide little funding<br />
for evaluation (which may cost as much as the program<br />
itself if effectiveness <strong>and</strong> cost – effectiveness are to be<br />
measured) <strong>and</strong> research - funded programs tend to pay<br />
little attention to program sustainability <strong>and</strong> integration<br />
into existing services.<br />
Complexity of p rogram i mplementation<br />
<strong>and</strong> e valuation<br />
There are many different approaches to program<br />
implementation but they all encounter the complexity<br />
of having to juggle multiple partners, agendas, funding<br />
constraints, <strong>and</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> organizational relationships.<br />
There is no simple formula for negotiating this<br />
complexity <strong>and</strong> the mix will be different for each<br />
context. Similarly, the evaluation of multi - sector<br />
intervention programs which are under community<br />
control are complex, especially when potential comparison<br />
populations are exposed to a variety of other<br />
local, state <strong>and</strong> national programs to promote healthy<br />
eating <strong>and</strong> physical activity. Quasi - experimental<br />
designs can be used for program evaluation but they<br />
all carry higher risks of arriving at false negative or<br />
false positive conclusions than the more rigorous controlled<br />
trials that r<strong>and</strong>omize individuals or clusters<br />
(e.g. schools).<br />
Incorporating s ocio - c ultural c omponents<br />
There are significant differences in obesity prevalence<br />
rates across ethnic groups <strong>and</strong> this indicates that<br />
socio - cultural factors must be considered in any<br />
implementation program in those groups. 20,21 For<br />
example, if the over - provision <strong>and</strong> over - consumption<br />
of food is a fundamental expression of the underlying<br />
cultural values of showing care, respect <strong>and</strong><br />
love between people, how can obesity prevention<br />
225