21.11.2014 Views

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Community interventions—planning for sustainability<br />

integrated into other systems <strong>and</strong> structures <strong>and</strong> build<br />

on other areas of the community ’ s capacity. 6<br />

Principles of e valuation<br />

Evaluation is covered in Chapter 19 in detail, but<br />

some principles as they apply to the planning stages<br />

are outlined here. It is very important that the<br />

approach <strong>and</strong> framework for evaluation are developed<br />

concurrently in the program planning phase. 12 The<br />

capacity to conduct the evaluation needs to match<br />

the size <strong>and</strong> scope of the evaluation intended. The<br />

framework or evaluation plan should contain options<br />

for measuring process, impact <strong>and</strong> outcomes of<br />

the implementation. Outcome <strong>and</strong> impact evaluation<br />

correspond to changes in the program ’ s aims <strong>and</strong><br />

objectives. For well - evaluated demonstration projects,<br />

these would include changes in anthropometry,<br />

behaviors (skills, knowledge), environments <strong>and</strong><br />

4<br />

capacity. Ideally, an economic evaluation should<br />

be conducted to contribute to the evidence of cost –<br />

effectiveness <strong>and</strong> optimal implementation. The use of<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard measures <strong>and</strong> tools will enable a com parison<br />

with other programs/projects. Documenting lessons<br />

learnt is valuable in dissemination <strong>and</strong> can contribute<br />

to the evidence of what does, or does not, work. The<br />

context for evaluation needs consideration as current<br />

organizational, policy, <strong>and</strong> community contextual<br />

factors can have a major impact on the outcomes.<br />

Evaluation findings need to be disseminated within<br />

the community in the first instance <strong>and</strong> this should<br />

occur as the findings become available so that knowledge<br />

transfer can be applied back in the community.<br />

At the next level, translation of evidence from research<br />

into policy <strong>and</strong> practice is required for a continuous<br />

response to obesity at the public health policy level.<br />

Key c hallenges in<br />

e stablishing <strong>and</strong> s ustaining<br />

c ommunity i nterventions<br />

The very nature of community - based interventions<br />

creates challenges because they are inevitably complex<br />

to implement <strong>and</strong> evaluate, they are always contextual,<br />

<strong>and</strong> are usually poorly resourced. However, a few<br />

particular challenges in existing <strong>and</strong> future commu-<br />

nity approaches to obesity prevention warrant special<br />

mention.<br />

Sufficient i nvestment in p rograms<br />

<strong>and</strong> e valuations<br />

The time lag from the early signs of the obesity epidemic<br />

in the early 1980s to the first phase of community<br />

- based demonstration projects in a few countries<br />

in the mid - 2000s was substantial <strong>and</strong>, even now, the<br />

funding investment to build the evidence base for<br />

effectiveness has remained very low. Government -<br />

funded programs traditionally provide little funding<br />

for evaluation (which may cost as much as the program<br />

itself if effectiveness <strong>and</strong> cost – effectiveness are to be<br />

measured) <strong>and</strong> research - funded programs tend to pay<br />

little attention to program sustainability <strong>and</strong> integration<br />

into existing services.<br />

Complexity of p rogram i mplementation<br />

<strong>and</strong> e valuation<br />

There are many different approaches to program<br />

implementation but they all encounter the complexity<br />

of having to juggle multiple partners, agendas, funding<br />

constraints, <strong>and</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> organizational relationships.<br />

There is no simple formula for negotiating this<br />

complexity <strong>and</strong> the mix will be different for each<br />

context. Similarly, the evaluation of multi - sector<br />

intervention programs which are under community<br />

control are complex, especially when potential comparison<br />

populations are exposed to a variety of other<br />

local, state <strong>and</strong> national programs to promote healthy<br />

eating <strong>and</strong> physical activity. Quasi - experimental<br />

designs can be used for program evaluation but they<br />

all carry higher risks of arriving at false negative or<br />

false positive conclusions than the more rigorous controlled<br />

trials that r<strong>and</strong>omize individuals or clusters<br />

(e.g. schools).<br />

Incorporating s ocio - c ultural c omponents<br />

There are significant differences in obesity prevalence<br />

rates across ethnic groups <strong>and</strong> this indicates that<br />

socio - cultural factors must be considered in any<br />

implementation program in those groups. 20,21 For<br />

example, if the over - provision <strong>and</strong> over - consumption<br />

of food is a fundamental expression of the underlying<br />

cultural values of showing care, respect <strong>and</strong><br />

love between people, how can obesity prevention<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!