Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 28<br />
Box 28.1 The EPODE program<br />
EPODE ( ‘ Ensemble pr é venons l ’ ob é sit é des enfants:<br />
Together, let ’ s prevent childhood obesity ’ ) is an innovative<br />
program, developed in France <strong>and</strong> launched in<br />
2004 to help prevent obesity in children. In 2010,<br />
about 200 French towns were involved in EPODE<br />
<strong>and</strong> the program is now being run out in Belgium,<br />
Spain, South Australia <strong>and</strong> Canada (Qu é bec). The<br />
original 10 towns in the pilot program have now<br />
fulfilled their original commitment for five years <strong>and</strong><br />
have all reaffirmed their commitment for another<br />
five years, indicating the strong sustainability of the<br />
concept.<br />
Box 28.2 Engaging the champions<br />
A key aspect of EPODE is its involvement of local<br />
authorities through the local mayors. In France, these<br />
local authorities have jurisdiction over kindergartens<br />
<strong>and</strong> primary schools, covering the primary target of<br />
children aged 3 – 12 years. Mayors are invited to submit<br />
an application to be an EPODE community; this<br />
involves signing a charter promising to employ a full -<br />
time project manager for the program, organize specific<br />
activities each month in the city, participate in<br />
national meetings of project managers <strong>and</strong> commit at<br />
least 1 euro per capita per annum for five years<br />
(although many authorities commit much more than<br />
this).<br />
subsidies for healthy foods or products, regulating<br />
advertising to children, 8 making unhealthy foods less<br />
visible, more expensive <strong>and</strong> harder to access. 9<br />
It is appropriate to include advocacy elements in a<br />
social marketing strategy. Indeed, some would say that<br />
social marketers should consider environmental<br />
change first 10 <strong>and</strong> we should only attempt to persuade<br />
individuals to change their behavior when all possible<br />
environmental changes have been put in place that<br />
will make it easier for them to change. Targeting local<br />
champions is also a key social marketing strategy<br />
because they can significantly influence opinions <strong>and</strong><br />
mobilize resources (Box 28.2 ).<br />
Other chapters in this book go into more detail on<br />
strategies to change the environment so the rest of this<br />
chapter will focus on the more conventional, down-<br />
stream social marketing activities involved when<br />
trying to persuade individuals to change their behavior.<br />
Some well - accepted marketing principles are discussed<br />
later <strong>and</strong> shown how they were used in the<br />
EPODE context: “ getting the right message ” <strong>and</strong><br />
“ getting the message right ” for different target markets;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the marketing mix. But first, we identify a number<br />
of fundamental communication principles to be<br />
considered when designing a social marketing<br />
campaign:<br />
11<br />
• The receiver is an active processor of incoming<br />
information: A message will be received differently<br />
by different people; pre - existing beliefs, attitudes,<br />
experiences <strong>and</strong> knowledge affect the way an individual<br />
attends to, interprets <strong>and</strong> accepts a message.<br />
• Different target audiences may respond to different<br />
messages differently: Target audiences must be<br />
segmented by beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes before the development<br />
of targeted messages.<br />
• Formative research, including message pre - testing<br />
is essential: Formative research (focus groups/<br />
interviews) is conducted with the target audience to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> their different beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes.<br />
Messages are then pre - tested with the target audience<br />
to ensure underst<strong>and</strong>ing, <strong>and</strong> with secondary<br />
audiences, to ensure there are no unintended negative<br />
effects.<br />
• A theoretical framework increases the likelihood<br />
of success: Campaigns guided by theoretical frameworks<br />
are more likely to be successful than those<br />
that are not. Some of the important models of attitude<br />
<strong>and</strong> behavior change include the Health Belief<br />
Model, Protection Motivation Theory, Theory of<br />
Reasoned Action <strong>and</strong> the Theory of Trying (for a<br />
summary, see Andreasen). 3<br />
• Comprehensive, coordinated interventions are<br />
most successful: Successful campaigns are comprehensive<br />
<strong>and</strong> coordinated with other environmental<br />
<strong>and</strong> on - the - ground strategies to ensure<br />
attitudinal <strong>and</strong> behavioral success.<br />
• Multiple delivery channels <strong>and</strong> multiple sources<br />
increase the likelihood of success: Communication<br />
campaigns involving a number of message delivery<br />
channels <strong>and</strong> more than one source appear to be<br />
more successful than those that do not. 12<br />
• Campaigns must be sustained to be effective:<br />
Communication campaigns must be sustained over<br />
time to achieve <strong>and</strong> maintain success.<br />
244