21.11.2014 Views

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lessons from the control of other epidemics<br />

that a wider range of tools <strong>and</strong> approaches are<br />

required. One approach has been the development<br />

<strong>and</strong> adoption of codes of conduct that specify the<br />

control of marketing <strong>and</strong> trade of goods felt to damage<br />

public health. 11 Perhaps the most famous example<br />

is that of the International Code of Conduct on<br />

Breastfeeding Substitutes. This is a non - binding recommendation<br />

adopted by the World Health Assembly<br />

in 1981, with the purpose of promoting breastfeeding<br />

<strong>and</strong> regulating the marketing of breast - milk substitutes.<br />

However, this example also illustrates the limitation<br />

of voluntary codes with numerous documented<br />

transgressions of the Code by the breast - milk substitute<br />

industry. 12 This has led to the recognition of the<br />

need to develop more binding instruments.<br />

In terms of binding instruments, the International<br />

Health Regulations were adopted by the Assembly in<br />

1948 in order to control the international spread of<br />

communicable diseases. Most recently, the Framework<br />

Convention on Tobacco Control ( FCTC ), is a binding<br />

international convention, which aims to circumscribe<br />

the global spread of tobacco use <strong>and</strong> tobacco products<br />

(Box 2.1 ).<br />

Legally binding instruments have the distinct<br />

advantage that State Parties tend to comply, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

disadvantage of a drawn - out process <strong>and</strong> the need<br />

for global political support for a single solution.<br />

Approaches which endorse binding international<br />

instruments on food - related health issues have been<br />

limited to food safety <strong>and</strong> security <strong>and</strong>, more recently,<br />

discussions of rights - based approaches to undernutrition.<br />

The non - binding intergovernmental resolution<br />

has the advantage of flexibility. Potential international<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> instruments in this area might address<br />

issues such as marketing restrictions for unhealthy<br />

food products, restrictions on the advertising <strong>and</strong><br />

availability of unhealthy products in schools, st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

packaging <strong>and</strong> labeling of food products, <strong>and</strong> potential<br />

price or tax measures to reduce the dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

unhealthy products. There is also the advantage of the<br />

public attention surrounding the drafting of such an<br />

instrument <strong>and</strong> the fact that it may set general st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

for corporate conduct without actually being<br />

passed through legislation.<br />

More recently, the importance of international<br />

trade has put the relationship between trade agreements<br />

<strong>and</strong> public health more in the spotlight. The<br />

World Trade Organization ( WTO ) has become the<br />

Box 2.1 WHO F ramework<br />

C onvention on T obacco<br />

C ontrol ( FCTC )<br />

The WHO FCTC is the first global health treaty to be<br />

negotiated under the auspices of the WHO. It was<br />

developed in response to the globalization of the<br />

tobacco epidemic <strong>and</strong> asserts the importance of a<br />

broad range of strategies for dem<strong>and</strong> reduction.<br />

These include: price <strong>and</strong> tax measures; protection<br />

from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; regulation<br />

<strong>and</strong> disclosure of the contents of tobacco<br />

products; packaging <strong>and</strong> labeling; education, communication,<br />

training <strong>and</strong> public awareness; comprehensive<br />

ban <strong>and</strong> restriction on tobacco advertising,<br />

promotion <strong>and</strong> sponsorship; <strong>and</strong> tobacco dependence<br />

<strong>and</strong> cessation measures. There are also a<br />

number of measures relating to a reduction in the<br />

supply of tobacco including: elimination of the illicit<br />

trade of tobacco products; restriction of sales to <strong>and</strong><br />

by minors <strong>and</strong> support for economically viable alternatives<br />

for growers.<br />

The treaty came into force on 27 February 2005,<br />

<strong>and</strong> with almost 150 parties it is one of the most widely<br />

embraced treaties in UN history. Notably absent from<br />

the list of signatory countries are Russia <strong>and</strong> Indonesia;<br />

the USA has signed but not ratified the treaty. The<br />

challenge of implementation of the WHO FCTC<br />

involves putting in place the required technical foundation,<br />

translating the treaty into national laws, creating<br />

strong mechanisms for enforcement, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

monitoring their implementation. With about 25% of<br />

adults smoking, there is a long way to go before<br />

achieving full implementation of the treaty <strong>and</strong> a<br />

reduction in the prevalence of smoking. The early<br />

signs are encouraging with governments in low - <strong>and</strong><br />

middle - income countries such as South Africa moving<br />

rapidly to legislate most of the provisions in the<br />

Convention. National surveys show that the adoption<br />

of this suite of broad legal <strong>and</strong> voluntary measures has<br />

reduced smoking among the poorest sections of the<br />

population by at least 30%.<br />

arbiter of conflicts around the desire to reduce trade<br />

barriers, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the need to protect<br />

populations from harmful practices <strong>and</strong> goods, on the<br />

other. For example, a government ’ s ability to establish<br />

<strong>and</strong> maintain legitimate, non - discriminatory food<br />

safety <strong>and</strong> food - related consumer information labeling<br />

policies has been challenged as a barrier to free<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!