21.11.2014 Views

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Obesity</strong> prevention in early childhood<br />

group at the six - month follow - up ( P = 0.0027) after<br />

adjustment for sex <strong>and</strong> baseline performance.<br />

These interventions achieved significant behavioral<br />

changes, yet only two produced some effects on prevention<br />

of obesity — one had a directed exercise<br />

program, 41 the other included both diet <strong>and</strong> exercise<br />

components. 39 However, the effect was significant<br />

only among girls <strong>and</strong> not sustainable after six months<br />

post intervention in one study, 41 while it was effective<br />

<strong>and</strong> sustainable only among Blacks 39 not the Latinos 40<br />

in the other, suggesting that gender <strong>and</strong> cultural difference<br />

should be addressed in designing the intervention<br />

activities. The two studies that did not report<br />

significant reductions in weight status had similar<br />

intervention approaches <strong>and</strong> intensity, <strong>and</strong> a comparable<br />

number of participants in one study (but less in<br />

the other). However, the duration of follow - up was<br />

shorter. These equivocal results highlight the need for<br />

more studies to provide further evidence on effectiveness<br />

of these promising strategies.<br />

Innovative e ducational p rogram<br />

For a young child, health <strong>and</strong> education are inseparable.<br />

There is no published evaluation of an educational<br />

program for young children on preventing<br />

obesity. The only published report, the “ Color Me<br />

Healthy ” intervention, evaluated program acceptability<br />

<strong>and</strong> implementation <strong>and</strong> children ’ s knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

some behaviors. 44 This educational program was<br />

implemented widely in North Carolina <strong>and</strong> was<br />

designed to increase physical activity <strong>and</strong> promote<br />

healthy eating in 4 – 5 - year - old children through the<br />

development of fun, colorful <strong>and</strong> innovative educational<br />

materials. The content development was guided<br />

by social cognitive theory <strong>and</strong> the socio - ecological<br />

model. Trained child - care providers (1338 participants<br />

in 53 training sessions) delivered the program<br />

in a range of care settings <strong>and</strong> the eight - week follow -<br />

up evaluation showed that over 90% of providers<br />

reported increases in children ’ s physical activity,<br />

knowledge about movement <strong>and</strong> knowledge about<br />

healthy eating. 44 The train - the - trainer model in this<br />

intervention holds promise as a way of improving the<br />

child - care environment on a large scale <strong>and</strong> in a range<br />

of child - care settings. It will be important to determine<br />

the sustainability of the program <strong>and</strong> its ability<br />

to positively influence children ’ s risk <strong>and</strong> protective<br />

behaviors related to childhood obesity.<br />

Interventions with an e nvironmental f ocus<br />

Child - care settings should provide an environment in<br />

which young children are offered nutritious foods <strong>and</strong><br />

regular physical activity through structured <strong>and</strong><br />

unstructured play, so that they learn these healthy<br />

lifestyle behaviors at an early age. 20 Thus child care<br />

plays a critical role in laying a foundation for healthy<br />

weight. Currently, there are four published studies of<br />

45 – 48<br />

environmental interventions in child care. One<br />

study reported self - assessment of the nutrition <strong>and</strong><br />

physical activity child - care environment <strong>and</strong> its<br />

implementation, feasibility <strong>and</strong> acceptability; <strong>and</strong><br />

found a variety of environmental improvements post -<br />

intervention. 45 Food <strong>and</strong> nutrition environments were<br />

46 – 48<br />

the focus of interventions in the other studies.<br />

Leahy et al 46 altered the energy density of a lunch<br />

entr é e <strong>and</strong> determined the effect on 2 - to 5 - year - old<br />

children ’s subsequent ad libitum intake of lunch. This<br />

intervention was found to be effective in reducing<br />

children ’ s energy intake from the entr é e <strong>and</strong> total<br />

lunch energy intake. Matwiejczyk et al 47 evaluated an<br />

incentive initiative — the “ Start Right Eat Right ”<br />

award — that aimed to improve the nutrition provided<br />

to children attending child - care centers in South<br />

Australia. Substantial changes were reported in the<br />

food policies of the child - care centers <strong>and</strong> there was a<br />

resulting improvement in food provision <strong>and</strong> nutrition<br />

practices in these settings.<br />

Children ’s anthropometric measurement was<br />

included as the outcome in only one study. Williams<br />

et al 48 examined how a change in the school food<br />

service aimed at reducing saturated fat intake, without<br />

compromising energy intake or nutrient content of<br />

the available diet, modified serum cholesterol <strong>and</strong><br />

weight status. The intervention was based on the<br />

Piaget Stage 2 Model, Social Learning Theory <strong>and</strong><br />

High/Scope Active Learning. Nine Head Start Centers,<br />

which served predominantly minority children from<br />

families with incomes below the US poverty level.<br />

Children were assigned to one of the three study<br />

groups: a control group with a safety education curriculum<br />

but without food service modification (350<br />

children aged 49.3 ± 6.1 months), an intervention<br />

group with food service modification plus a child/<br />

family nutrition education program (242 children<br />

aged 48.3 ± 6.9 months), or an intervention group<br />

with food service modification plus a safety curriculum<br />

(195 children aged 47.9 ± 6.4 months). Behavioral<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!