Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
Preventing Childhood Obesity - Evidence Policy and Practice.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Obesity</strong> prevention in early childhood<br />
group at the six - month follow - up ( P = 0.0027) after<br />
adjustment for sex <strong>and</strong> baseline performance.<br />
These interventions achieved significant behavioral<br />
changes, yet only two produced some effects on prevention<br />
of obesity — one had a directed exercise<br />
program, 41 the other included both diet <strong>and</strong> exercise<br />
components. 39 However, the effect was significant<br />
only among girls <strong>and</strong> not sustainable after six months<br />
post intervention in one study, 41 while it was effective<br />
<strong>and</strong> sustainable only among Blacks 39 not the Latinos 40<br />
in the other, suggesting that gender <strong>and</strong> cultural difference<br />
should be addressed in designing the intervention<br />
activities. The two studies that did not report<br />
significant reductions in weight status had similar<br />
intervention approaches <strong>and</strong> intensity, <strong>and</strong> a comparable<br />
number of participants in one study (but less in<br />
the other). However, the duration of follow - up was<br />
shorter. These equivocal results highlight the need for<br />
more studies to provide further evidence on effectiveness<br />
of these promising strategies.<br />
Innovative e ducational p rogram<br />
For a young child, health <strong>and</strong> education are inseparable.<br />
There is no published evaluation of an educational<br />
program for young children on preventing<br />
obesity. The only published report, the “ Color Me<br />
Healthy ” intervention, evaluated program acceptability<br />
<strong>and</strong> implementation <strong>and</strong> children ’ s knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />
some behaviors. 44 This educational program was<br />
implemented widely in North Carolina <strong>and</strong> was<br />
designed to increase physical activity <strong>and</strong> promote<br />
healthy eating in 4 – 5 - year - old children through the<br />
development of fun, colorful <strong>and</strong> innovative educational<br />
materials. The content development was guided<br />
by social cognitive theory <strong>and</strong> the socio - ecological<br />
model. Trained child - care providers (1338 participants<br />
in 53 training sessions) delivered the program<br />
in a range of care settings <strong>and</strong> the eight - week follow -<br />
up evaluation showed that over 90% of providers<br />
reported increases in children ’ s physical activity,<br />
knowledge about movement <strong>and</strong> knowledge about<br />
healthy eating. 44 The train - the - trainer model in this<br />
intervention holds promise as a way of improving the<br />
child - care environment on a large scale <strong>and</strong> in a range<br />
of child - care settings. It will be important to determine<br />
the sustainability of the program <strong>and</strong> its ability<br />
to positively influence children ’ s risk <strong>and</strong> protective<br />
behaviors related to childhood obesity.<br />
Interventions with an e nvironmental f ocus<br />
Child - care settings should provide an environment in<br />
which young children are offered nutritious foods <strong>and</strong><br />
regular physical activity through structured <strong>and</strong><br />
unstructured play, so that they learn these healthy<br />
lifestyle behaviors at an early age. 20 Thus child care<br />
plays a critical role in laying a foundation for healthy<br />
weight. Currently, there are four published studies of<br />
45 – 48<br />
environmental interventions in child care. One<br />
study reported self - assessment of the nutrition <strong>and</strong><br />
physical activity child - care environment <strong>and</strong> its<br />
implementation, feasibility <strong>and</strong> acceptability; <strong>and</strong><br />
found a variety of environmental improvements post -<br />
intervention. 45 Food <strong>and</strong> nutrition environments were<br />
46 – 48<br />
the focus of interventions in the other studies.<br />
Leahy et al 46 altered the energy density of a lunch<br />
entr é e <strong>and</strong> determined the effect on 2 - to 5 - year - old<br />
children ’s subsequent ad libitum intake of lunch. This<br />
intervention was found to be effective in reducing<br />
children ’ s energy intake from the entr é e <strong>and</strong> total<br />
lunch energy intake. Matwiejczyk et al 47 evaluated an<br />
incentive initiative — the “ Start Right Eat Right ”<br />
award — that aimed to improve the nutrition provided<br />
to children attending child - care centers in South<br />
Australia. Substantial changes were reported in the<br />
food policies of the child - care centers <strong>and</strong> there was a<br />
resulting improvement in food provision <strong>and</strong> nutrition<br />
practices in these settings.<br />
Children ’s anthropometric measurement was<br />
included as the outcome in only one study. Williams<br />
et al 48 examined how a change in the school food<br />
service aimed at reducing saturated fat intake, without<br />
compromising energy intake or nutrient content of<br />
the available diet, modified serum cholesterol <strong>and</strong><br />
weight status. The intervention was based on the<br />
Piaget Stage 2 Model, Social Learning Theory <strong>and</strong><br />
High/Scope Active Learning. Nine Head Start Centers,<br />
which served predominantly minority children from<br />
families with incomes below the US poverty level.<br />
Children were assigned to one of the three study<br />
groups: a control group with a safety education curriculum<br />
but without food service modification (350<br />
children aged 49.3 ± 6.1 months), an intervention<br />
group with food service modification plus a child/<br />
family nutrition education program (242 children<br />
aged 48.3 ± 6.9 months), or an intervention group<br />
with food service modification plus a safety curriculum<br />
(195 children aged 47.9 ± 6.4 months). Behavioral<br />
75