11.07.2015 Views

Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology

Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology

Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MMacintoshSince its inception in 1984, Apple’s Macintosh line <strong>of</strong> personalcomputers has <strong>of</strong>fered a distinctive, innovative alternativeto the more mainstream IBM-compatible PCs. When theMacintosh came out, it was billed as the computer “for therest <strong>of</strong> us.” Unlike the text-based, comm<strong>and</strong>-driven DOSbasedIBM PC <strong>and</strong> its “clones,” the “Mac” <strong>of</strong>fered an interfacethat consisted <strong>of</strong> menus, folders, <strong>and</strong> icons that couldbe manipulated by clicking <strong>and</strong> dragging (see user interface<strong>and</strong> mouse). The system came out <strong>of</strong> the box with apaint/draw program <strong>and</strong> a word processor that could showdocuments using the actual font sizes <strong>and</strong> styles that wouldappear in printed text. This “WYSIWYG” (What You See IsWhat You Get) feature quickly made the Mac the machine<strong>of</strong> choice for desktop publishers <strong>and</strong> graphic artists. TheMac also met with some success in the educational market,where the way had been paved by the earlier Apple II.However, there were factors would limit the Macto a minority market share. The first models ran slowly.Although its Motorola 68000 processor was comparable tothe Intel 80286 used by the IBM XT <strong>and</strong> AT series, the needto draw extensive graphics placed a heavier burden on theMac’s CPU.Marketing decisions also proved to be problematic. TheIBM PC had an “open architecture.” Clone makers were ableto legally produce machines that were functionally equivalent,<strong>and</strong> Micros<strong>of</strong>t was able to license to clone manufacturersessentially the same DOS operating system that IBMused. This created a robust market as manufacturers competedwith added features or lower prices.Apple, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, jealously guarded the Apple’shardware <strong>and</strong> the ROM (read only memory) that held thekey operating system code. Apple made only a brief <strong>and</strong>half-hearted attempt to license the Mac OS to third partiesin 1995, <strong>and</strong> by then it was probably too late. Apple CEOSteve Jobs (see Jobs, Steve) kept prices relatively high, bettingthat the Mac’s unique operating system <strong>and</strong> interfacewould entice people to buy the more expensive machine.But something <strong>of</strong> a vicious circle set in. Since the Macused a unique operating system, developing new applications(or porting existing ones) to the Mac was expensive.And since the Mac market represented only a small fraction<strong>of</strong> the PC-compatible market, developers were reluctant tocreate such s<strong>of</strong>tware. Some flagship products such as AldusPageMaker <strong>and</strong> Adobe Photoshop did cater to the Mac’sgraphic strengths. In general, however, the PC-compatibleowner had a far wider range <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware to choose from,<strong>and</strong> businesses were traditionally more comfortable withIBM equipment, even if IBM didn’t make it.Micros<strong>of</strong>t helped develop some successful Mac s<strong>of</strong>tware,including versions <strong>of</strong> its Word <strong>and</strong> Office programs. ButMicros<strong>of</strong>t CEO Bill Gates responded to the Mac’s interfaceadvantages over MS-DOS by developing a new operatingenvironment, Windows. Apple sued, claiming that Micros<strong>of</strong>thad gone beyond the license it had negotiated withApple for use <strong>of</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> the Mac interface. By the early1990s, however, Apple had lost the lawsuit. While the earlyversions <strong>of</strong> Windows were clumsy <strong>and</strong> met with little success,version 3.0 <strong>and</strong>, later, Windows 95 succeeded in providinga user experience that was increasingly close to thatachieved by the Mac.287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!