08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mart<strong>in</strong> Berg<br />

Fitness APIs as Health Data Superstructures<br />

Wearable health technologies and fitness apps are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>terconnected through APIs (application<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terface) through which data from sensors are transferred, translated and <strong>in</strong>terpreted. This<br />

paper builds on a close critical read<strong>in</strong>g of the technical documentation of some of the most popular fitness<br />

APIs (Apple HealthKit, Fitbit, HealthGraph and With<strong>in</strong>gs among others) and aims at establish<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of how human bodies and their activities are conceptualised and measured as data through<br />

APIs. Depart<strong>in</strong>g from these empirical read<strong>in</strong>gs, the paper conceptualises fitness APIs as “health data<br />

superstructures” that to various extents render certa<strong>in</strong> self-track<strong>in</strong>g and body-monitor<strong>in</strong>g practices more<br />

feasible than others. Such a conceptualisation is important s<strong>in</strong>ce it allows for further explorations of the<br />

limits and possibilities of how wearable technologies are designed, developed and used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with<br />

other apps and technologies.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>na Ruckenste<strong>in</strong><br />

Politics of Everyday Analytics and the Informatics-Behavioral Register<br />

This paper situates the politics of life that the current expansion everyday analytics and related self-track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices promote with<strong>in</strong> “the <strong>in</strong>formatics-behavioral register” (Schüll <strong>2016</strong>) that rely on the datafication of<br />

daily lives. The politics of life, that the <strong>in</strong>formatics-behavioral regime susta<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>volve a multitude of<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approaches and techniques that participate <strong>in</strong> modify<strong>in</strong>g everyday action. Such modifications<br />

rely, for <strong>in</strong>stance, on nudg<strong>in</strong>g and gamification approaches, underl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the difficulty of convert<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

translat<strong>in</strong>g the everyday <strong>in</strong>to data-driven feedback loops <strong>in</strong> a manner that people would f<strong>in</strong>d appeal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Some applications treat people like Pavlovian dogs, or human cattle, while other personal data uses open<br />

reflexive spaces to encourage people to share and discuss aspects of their lives. The paper outl<strong>in</strong>es a politics<br />

of everyday analytics that expla<strong>in</strong>s this diversity by focus<strong>in</strong>g on the datafication of life, cover<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />

around commercialization of personal data, emerg<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>in</strong>frastructures and everyday data practices.<br />

4L<br />

Research practice and ethical engagements (Chair, Yrjö Kall<strong>in</strong>en)<br />

Amelia Johns<br />

Ethical researcher engagement with digital cultures of marg<strong>in</strong>alised youth<br />

Techno-utopian visions that hail the digital cultures of marg<strong>in</strong>alised youth for the way they unsettle<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant narratives and structures often overlook how power operates with<strong>in</strong> social media, with problems<br />

of who gets to def<strong>in</strong>e and represent marg<strong>in</strong>alised voices often lead<strong>in</strong>g to conflict. In my current research I<br />

engage with these tensions via a digital ethnography of the Mipsterz (“Muslim Hipsters”) onl<strong>in</strong>e community.<br />

The heated negotiations of faith and identity which flow through Mipsterz social media br<strong>in</strong>gs attention to<br />

the challenges for marg<strong>in</strong>alised youth and their media to promote <strong>in</strong>clusive public cultures. In this paper, I<br />

want to focus on the ethical challenges that arise from researcher contact with the field. As digital<br />

ethnography always entails ethical challenges that implicate researchers – not as objective observers but as<br />

actors who affect the communities be<strong>in</strong>g researched – this may provide lessons for future research.<br />

Ben Light, Peta Mitchell* & Patrik Wikström<br />

Digital public sexual cultures and the ethics of location<br />

With the rise of geo-social media, location is emerg<strong>in</strong>g as a particularly sensitive data po<strong>in</strong>t for digital media<br />

research (Leszczynski 2015). The ethical sensitivities around location are further heightened <strong>in</strong> the context of<br />

research <strong>in</strong>to public sexual cultures – that is, research that <strong>in</strong>volves the study of sexual practices <strong>in</strong> places<br />

such as parks, shopp<strong>in</strong>g malls and sex clubs. In this paper, we <strong>in</strong>vestigate ethical considerations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

us<strong>in</strong>g digital methods to analyse a web-based geo-social platform for users seek<strong>in</strong>g and contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!