Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a Tanzanian/Danish educational encounter, which is facilitated by the Danish NGO Action Aid Denmark at<br />
the organization’s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center <strong>in</strong> Arusha Tanzania. The focus of the analysis will be on expectations and<br />
performances of cultural difference by teachers and students dur<strong>in</strong>g classroom lessons <strong>in</strong> Tanzanian culture,<br />
politics and society.<br />
Lise Paulsen Galal<br />
Becom<strong>in</strong>g more tolerant<br />
Interfaith dialogue <strong>in</strong>itiatives have <strong>in</strong> Denmark become a popular response to current conflicts connected<br />
with migration and religious differences. Particularly Christian religious actors and organizations take the<br />
lead <strong>in</strong> orchestrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terfaith dialogue as a way to become more tolerant towards cultural and religious<br />
Others. In this paper, I explore how diverse ritual practices and ideas of a common humanity legitimized by<br />
Christianity def<strong>in</strong>e the sett<strong>in</strong>g and subjectivities of the participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfaith dialogue. The aim is to<br />
analyze how ritual becomes a vehicle for change and how the aim of transformation <strong>in</strong>to a more tolerant<br />
human be<strong>in</strong>g of a particular – Christian – k<strong>in</strong>d encourages specific technologies of self.<br />
Kirsten Hvenegård-Lassen<br />
Mov<strong>in</strong>g the Elephant<br />
Diversity management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is a widespread activity that aims at educat<strong>in</strong>g facilitators of <strong>in</strong>tercultural<br />
encounters or, <strong>in</strong> other cases, at produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terculturally competent leaders, professionals or citizens.<br />
Organizers of diversity management activities may be consultancies, NGOs, HR-departments <strong>in</strong> private and<br />
public companies or mult<strong>in</strong>ational cha<strong>in</strong>s with each their particular and often copy-righted models of<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervention. Across the spectrum, diversity management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share ideas of diversity as a force that is<br />
both potentially disruptive and beneficial. In this paper, I discuss how tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g taps <strong>in</strong>to an affective modality<br />
or register <strong>in</strong> order to move the participants. The production of reformed subjectivities seems to be (among<br />
other) dependent on the creation of threshold experiences of heightened affective <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />
8D<br />
Dismantl<strong>in</strong>g the common good: work, health, and community (Chair, Maria Giannacopoulos)<br />
Niamh Stephenson<br />
vulnerability, security<br />
The role of catastrophe simulation <strong>in</strong> struggles with<strong>in</strong> public health over <strong>in</strong>equality,<br />
Public health’s attentiveness to populations can foreground social <strong>in</strong>equalities. It can also create <strong>in</strong>roads for<br />
people to make demands on government. However, the recent securitisation of public health threatens to<br />
underm<strong>in</strong>e public health’s familiar modes of attentiveness to its populations; <strong>in</strong> place of “the health of the<br />
population” <strong>in</strong>terest turns to <strong>in</strong>frastructures deemed key to governance. Questions of <strong>in</strong>equality are<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly refigured as concerns about “vulnerability”, and vulnerability demands govern<strong>in</strong>g so as to<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> security. Through an analysis of <strong>in</strong>terviews with public health actors, this paper exam<strong>in</strong>es struggles<br />
with<strong>in</strong> public health over the role of <strong>in</strong>fectious disease modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> securitisation. Whilst modell<strong>in</strong>g has been<br />
key to disease securitisation, it is also be<strong>in</strong>g cast as potentially “devalu<strong>in</strong>g the currency” of public health. The<br />
paper asks how <strong>in</strong>equalities are be<strong>in</strong>g reworked <strong>in</strong> this struggle over the normative political visions at work<br />
<strong>in</strong> public health.<br />
Elisabetta Magnani<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ance, labour, and the future of work<br />
In times that witnessed a stagger<strong>in</strong>g rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and wealth <strong>in</strong>equality, f<strong>in</strong>ance and labour have been<br />
separate crucial sites of empirical and theoretical <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> a number of discipl<strong>in</strong>es. Particularly s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the GFC they have become sites of <strong>in</strong>tensified political <strong>in</strong>vestment, thus challeng<strong>in</strong>g the often rigid<br />
conceptual separation between the economic and the political. As we emerge from a crisis of belief that<br />
198