08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for the human condition, and, (2) how they contributed to alter<strong>in</strong>g subsequent reflections on the space age<br />

and its implications. The images are discussed with reference to production contexts, reception by different<br />

audiences, and <strong>in</strong>fluence on ideas about the future of humanity <strong>in</strong> space. The images discussed were<br />

reflected upon by <strong>in</strong>fluential contemporary philosophers (Anders, Arendt, Lacan, etc.), and thereby helped<br />

shape the landscape of contemporary humanities’, and popular ideas about the near future.<br />

David M<strong>in</strong>to<br />

James Bond and the Queerness of Spies<br />

This paper makes two ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions. The first is to re-exam<strong>in</strong>e Ian Flem<strong>in</strong>g’s James Bond novels<br />

through the <strong>in</strong>sights of queer studies to explore their vulnerability to a homoerotic read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the context of<br />

their time, suggest<strong>in</strong>g how this <strong>in</strong>tersects with their political unconsciousness. The second is to situate such a<br />

queer read<strong>in</strong>g of Bond amidst the broader cultural field created over time by public circulations of “the spy”<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Anglosphere, pay<strong>in</strong>g particular attention to sexuality. Supposedly clandest<strong>in</strong>e but paradoxically<br />

popular, spies have long been strongly sexualized and gendered figures, and they rema<strong>in</strong> so today. This<br />

paper then moves from a queer read<strong>in</strong>g of the Bond books <strong>in</strong> their historical sett<strong>in</strong>g to elaborate a broader<br />

vision of the varied sexual politics of espionage’s acts and gazes. It leverages surveillance and secret agents<br />

to th<strong>in</strong>k afresh about <strong>in</strong>timacy’s relations to governance.<br />

7O<br />

Public Discourse and Queer Lives (Chair, Michael Nebel<strong>in</strong>g Petersen)<br />

Maxime Garnery<br />

contemporary US TV<br />

National queers and model m<strong>in</strong>orities: the construction of liberal benevolence <strong>in</strong><br />

The seem<strong>in</strong>gly unproblematic <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of queer characters <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g US TV series <strong>in</strong> the new<br />

millennium relies on the legitimation of homonormative bodies to represent the US as a post-gay, sexually<br />

modern nation. This operation takes place through two complementary ways: the construction of a premodern<br />

homophobic (cultural, class, racial, etc.) Other; and the redef<strong>in</strong>ition of citizens-to-be as objects of<br />

liberal benevolence. This paper exam<strong>in</strong>es this second, more <strong>in</strong>sidious process of televisual <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

nation, <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on the discreet yet cordial relationship between “progressive” sexual representations and<br />

the strict del<strong>in</strong>eation of citizenship along the l<strong>in</strong>es of race, gender, class, and culture. Through an<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Broad City’s Jaimé as a seem<strong>in</strong>gly oxymoronic foreign gay patriot, and Sense8’s Nomi as<br />

representative of the so-called “Transgender Tipp<strong>in</strong>g Po<strong>in</strong>t,” this paper identifies how national operations<br />

are masked by a liberal construction of model m<strong>in</strong>orities through sentimental politics of representation.<br />

Rhys Herden<br />

Revis<strong>in</strong>g Privacy: Same-sex marriages, the family and Personal Life<br />

The prospect of legal recognitions of same-sex marriages <strong>in</strong> Australia can be understood <strong>in</strong> a multitude of<br />

ways: as a step <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>ear LGBTIQA rights discourse; as a moment to <strong>in</strong>scribe LGBTIQA identities with “sexual<br />

citizenship”; as an <strong>in</strong>dication of the lamentable success of heteronormativity; and as the transnational<br />

revalorisation of “the family” <strong>in</strong> Western societies. This paper will demonstrate that these explanations can<br />

be augmented by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g them through the lens of private and personal life. I will attempt to mediate the<br />

positions held regard<strong>in</strong>g privacy as it relates to LGBTIQA people, as exemplified by Bol<strong>in</strong>g (1996) and<br />

Sedgwick (1990,) by demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g how we may theorise same-sex marriages as an opportunity through<br />

which “private life” can be reimag<strong>in</strong>ed without comply<strong>in</strong>g to heteronormativity. This can be achieved by<br />

critically exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fem<strong>in</strong>ist and queer critiques of privacy and family life alongside perspectives on the<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g contours of privacy and personal life.<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!