08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Western civilisation – permeates the space and everyday life practices of people <strong>in</strong> Turkey with all its<br />

political connotations. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on this context, my paper focuses on spatial practices <strong>in</strong> Istanbul that are<br />

shaped <strong>in</strong> a dialectical manner between Islam and secularism. Tak<strong>in</strong>g the secular and religious as analytical<br />

keys, I exam<strong>in</strong>e discursive and performative practices of the secular and religious through annual<br />

celebrations and commemorations organised <strong>in</strong> the districts of Istanbul. I discuss the relationship between<br />

civic engagement and the secularity/religiosity of events with particular attention to women’s participation<br />

<strong>in</strong> urban life.<br />

2H Data Cultures: Beyond the Given (Chair, Sal Humphreys)<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g its etymological roots, data means “the given.” Argu<strong>in</strong>g that data is however not simply “given” but<br />

constructed and utilized <strong>in</strong> particular ways, this panel probes a contextualized approach to data cultures and the<br />

politics of data. It addresses the translation between data and knowledge as well as articulations between<br />

micropolitics and macropolitics. The aim is to th<strong>in</strong>k across scales-from the local to the global and the body to the<br />

city-and understand the various implications of data-based modalities of management and organization. Hence the<br />

panel <strong>in</strong>quires <strong>in</strong>to the parallels and differences between proprietary social media platforms, smart-city applications<br />

and collaborative, open-source <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />

Grant Bollmer Scalable Intimacy/Captured Emotions<br />

“Intimacy builds worlds,” claims Lauren Berlant, “it creates spaces and usurps places meant for other k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

of relation.” Today, the political battles that def<strong>in</strong>e and mobilise <strong>in</strong>timacy <strong>in</strong>volve conflicts that negotiate<br />

banal local attachments with a technological network that promises global connectivity. This talk places <strong>in</strong>to<br />

dialogue questions of <strong>in</strong>timacy – seem<strong>in</strong>gly m<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong>teractions that reveal the quotidian bonds that make our<br />

lives and worlds – with questions of scale provoked by the “global <strong>in</strong>timacy” of social media. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

arguments of Zizi Pappacharissi’s Affective Publics, as well my own Inhuman Networks, I exam<strong>in</strong>e attempts<br />

by Facebook and other social media platforms to capture and analyse emotions as data that are then used to<br />

build a “world” that seems to exclude conscious human <strong>in</strong>teraction. Thus, I chart how “<strong>in</strong>timacy” can be<br />

used to functionally reimag<strong>in</strong>e “the human,” exclud<strong>in</strong>g the local attachments implied by the term “<strong>in</strong>timacy”<br />

for an imag<strong>in</strong>ary global “connectivity.”<br />

Rolien Hoyng<br />

The Politics of Free Flow: Data Mobilities and Territoriality <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Focused on Hong Kong, this paper explores how data rout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>forms management techniques and<br />

rationalities <strong>in</strong> techno-centric urban governance apparatuses that are articulated to norms such as<br />

“transparency,” “open data,” “connectivity,” and “free flow.” Draw<strong>in</strong>g from mobility studies, data flows –<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g their direction, pace and pattern – are managed and channelled <strong>in</strong> particular ways, and, we can<br />

add, transition <strong>in</strong>to knowledge at particular po<strong>in</strong>ts. It is this mobility that produces the order of urban life<br />

and space, ty<strong>in</strong>g micropolitical rout<strong>in</strong>es to macropolitical agendas. However, given Hong Kong’s political<br />

conjuncture, data logics are concomitant with diverse and contested imag<strong>in</strong>aries of freedom, which are<br />

centered alternatively on mobility, such as unchecked free flow, and territoriality, such as sovereign<br />

entitlements and liberal rights <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g free speech. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, this paper explores a series of paradoxes<br />

of mobility and territoriality by compar<strong>in</strong>g techno-centric apparatuses of governance to alternative practices<br />

by activists. Rather than free speech as an abstract right, I highlight emerg<strong>in</strong>g imag<strong>in</strong>aries of <strong>in</strong>formational<br />

freedoms <strong>in</strong> practices by Hong Kong’s civic hackers and digital activists.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!