08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some of these concerns, I explore the possibility of a fem<strong>in</strong>ist speculative design. I argue that for a fem<strong>in</strong>ist<br />

speculative design to be truly transformative it not only needs to acknowledge social <strong>in</strong>equalities but should<br />

challenge the ahistorical nature of much speculative design practice. I propose a complementary method of<br />

speculation that works with alternative and forgotten pasts <strong>in</strong> order to th<strong>in</strong>k about possible futures. I argue<br />

that by draw<strong>in</strong>g on fem<strong>in</strong>ist histories of everyday life, new speculative futures can emerge that pose<br />

decidedly different questions and modes of engagement.<br />

Naomi Stead* & KellyGreenop Domestic Micropractices at the Clothes L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Domestic laundry practices, <strong>in</strong> particular the l<strong>in</strong>e-dry<strong>in</strong>g of clothes, is a particular k<strong>in</strong>d of collaboration<br />

between human and natural world. L<strong>in</strong>e dry<strong>in</strong>g is an alliance with a given location’s climate, and weather,<br />

and hous<strong>in</strong>g type. It has seasonal and diurnal cycles, and represents a very particular mark<strong>in</strong>g of time, of<br />

human life measured <strong>in</strong> evaporation: wet loads hung out, and dry ones brought <strong>in</strong>. The study of dry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices thus offer an aperture through which to approach a range of issues around consumption and<br />

everyday life, everyday susta<strong>in</strong>ability, gendered labour, domestic practices, and the aesthetics of the<br />

everyday. The particular focus of this paper is on the mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> personal and political terms, of <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

rituals of laundry-hang<strong>in</strong>g. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on a series of seventeen <strong>in</strong>terviews undertaken by the authors, the<br />

paper attempts to theorise the decision to l<strong>in</strong>e-dry laundry as both an ethical and an affective one. While a<br />

number of scholars have studied wash<strong>in</strong>g, few have addressed the more particular process of dry<strong>in</strong>g. L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

dry<strong>in</strong>g (as dist<strong>in</strong>ct from tumble dry<strong>in</strong>g) has a clear role to play <strong>in</strong> the reduction of household energy use and<br />

thus <strong>in</strong> everyday household susta<strong>in</strong>ability. In this the paper follows Jane Bennett, and her contention that<br />

“the bodily discipl<strong>in</strong>es through which ethical sensibilities and social relations are formed are themselves<br />

political and constitute a whole (underexplored) field of ”micropolitics” (Bennett 2007, xii). The paper sets<br />

out to exam<strong>in</strong>e the micropolitics of the l<strong>in</strong>e dry<strong>in</strong>g, but more than this it is concerned with micropractices –<br />

whether the socks are hung together, from toe or cuff, pigeon-toed or splayed, fac<strong>in</strong>g left or right, with<br />

match<strong>in</strong>g peg or contrasted. Likewise it addresses a k<strong>in</strong>d of microaesthetics of dry<strong>in</strong>g – of everyday<br />

aesthetics (Saito 2007) and ord<strong>in</strong>ary affect (Stewart 2007). Laundry practices have often been framed <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of drudgery – of slavery to the wash<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e or clothesl<strong>in</strong>e, marked by endless, deaden<strong>in</strong>g<br />

repetition. Nevertheless, Richard Wilk asks why “we sometimes experience rout<strong>in</strong>es and habits as functional,<br />

relax<strong>in</strong>g, comfort<strong>in</strong>g and time-sav<strong>in</strong>g, while at other times they are annoy<strong>in</strong>g, restrictive, and even<br />

<strong>in</strong>tolerable” (Wilk 2009, <strong>14</strong>7). Us<strong>in</strong>g Wilk’s terms, it is possible to see <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>dividuals” dry<strong>in</strong>g practices a<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> cultivation – a deliberate push<strong>in</strong>g forward of the habitual chore <strong>in</strong>to a conscious and deliberate<br />

action. For other <strong>in</strong>dividuals, and still us<strong>in</strong>g Wilk’s terms, dry<strong>in</strong>g practices are entirely naturalized – not<br />

considered, not social, noth<strong>in</strong>g more than “submerged” physical experiences. The question is not only when<br />

and why the particular rout<strong>in</strong>e chore of hang<strong>in</strong>g out the wash<strong>in</strong>g takes on these two dist<strong>in</strong>ct modes, but<br />

what that might mean.<br />

2Q<br />

Digital citizenship and communities: ethics and resilience (Chair, Kate Mannell)<br />

Graham Meikle Social Media and Distributed Citizenship<br />

This paper proposes the concept of distributed citizenship — to assume a creative political relation with<br />

others with<strong>in</strong> digital media networks. Relations of distributed citizenship are not def<strong>in</strong>ed by or restricted to a<br />

particular geographical location or polity, but are def<strong>in</strong>ed rather by shared mean<strong>in</strong>gs and collaborative<br />

creativity and action with<strong>in</strong> and through networked digital media. Distributed citizenship describes a set of<br />

potentials made possible by social media, and by the altered experiences and awareness of culture,<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!